ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0282

Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib in TNFi-IR Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis from Three Phase 3 Clinical Trials

Roy Fleischmann1, Louis Bessette2, Jeffrey Sparks3, Stephen Hall4, Manish Jain5, Adriana Kakehasi6, Yanna Song7, Sebastian Meerwein8, Ryan DeMasi7, Jessica Suboticki9 and Andrea Rubbert-Roth10, 1University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Metroplex Clinical Research Center, Dallas, TX, 2Centre de l'Ostoporose et de Rhumatologie de Québec, Québec, QC, Canada, 3Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 4Emeritus Research and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, 5Great Lakes Clinical Trials, Chicago, IL, 6Federal University of Minas Gerais, Hospital das Clínicas, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 7AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL, 8AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co KG, LUDWIGSHAFEN, Germany, 9AbbVie, Inc., Mettawa, IL, 10Division of Rheumatology, Cantonal Clinic St Gallen, St.Gallen, Switzerland

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: clinical trial, Outcome measures

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 12, 2022

Title: RA – Treatment Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: For patients with RA who are refractory to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), such as tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis), optimal disease control is less likely to be achieved with subsequent therapy.1 In line with recommendations from EULAR and ACR, switching to a treatment with a different mechanism of action is appropriate for these patients.
We describe the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib (UPA) 15 mg once daily in patients with RA and an inadequate response or intolerance to TNFis (TNFi-IR).

Methods: A post hoc subgroup analysis was conducted in TNFi-IR patients who were treated with UPA 15 mg once daily in three Phase 3 clinical trials: SELECT-BEYOND,2 -CHOICE,3 and -COMPARE.4 For COMPARE, only patients treated with adalimumab and switched to UPA as rescue therapy were included. ≥20/50/70% improvement in ACR criteria, DAS28-CRP, Clinical Disease Activity Index, and Simple Disease Activity Index, as well as change from baseline in HAQ-DI and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were reported through 24 weeks. Non-responder imputation was used for all missing categorical outcomes; as observed (COMPARE) or multiple imputation (CHOICE, BEYOND) were used for missing continuous outcomes. Pooled safety results were presented as exposure-adjusted event rates (EAERs) with a cut-off of June 30, 2021.

Results: 568 TNFi-IR patients were included: 146 from BEYOND, 263 from CHOICE, and 159 from COMPARE. Mean duration since RA diagnosis was longer for BEYOND and CHOICE versus COMPARE; CV risk factors were common among this refractory population (Table). ACR20/50/70 and disease activity outcomes observed in the TNFi-IR population were generally consistent with the overall BEYOND2 and CHOICE3 bDMARD-IR populations, and consistent across the three studies in the TNFi-IR subgroups (Figure). Improvements in PROs including HAQ-DI, fatigue, pain, and morning stiffness over 24 weeks were observed (data not shown). Pooled safety results reporting 1574.8 PY of exposure in the TNFi-IR subgroup showed similar results to the overall BEYOND2 and CHOICE3 bDMARD-IR study populations, with EAERs of 3.1 events/100 PY for herpes zoster and 0.8 events/100 PY for adjudicated major adverse CV events and venous thromboembolism, and malignancy excluding non-melanoma skin cancer. The EAER of any AE leading to death was 1.4 events/100 PY.

Conclusion: In this post hoc subgroup analysis, TNFi-IR patients treated with UPA 15 mg achieved clinically meaningful efficacy responses over 24 weeks, with safety consistent with the overall bDMARD-IR patient population in the Phase 3 program.

References: 1. Rendas-Baum R, et al. Arthritis Res Ther 2011;13:R25; 2. Genovese C, et al. Lancet 2018;391:2513–24; 3. Rubbert-Roth A, et al. NEJM 2020;383:1511–21;
4. Fleischmann R, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2019;78:1454–62.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2


Disclosures: R. Fleischmann, AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galvani, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Galapagos; L. Bessette, AbbVie/Abbott, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Genzyme, UCB, Gilead, Merck/MSD, Organon, Roche; J. Sparks, Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie/Abbott, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead, Inova Diagnostics, Janssen, Optum, Pfizer; S. Hall, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Lilly, Janssen, UCB, Novartis, Amgen, Gilead, Merck; M. Jain, AbbVie, Amgen, Pfizer, Novartis, Janssen; A. Kakehasi, AbbVie, Amgen, Janssen, UCB, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Sandoz, Fresenius Kabi, Organon; Y. Song, AbbVie; S. Meerwein, AbbVie; R. DeMasi, AbbVie; J. Suboticki, AbbVie; A. Rubbert-Roth, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Fleischmann R, Bessette L, Sparks J, Hall S, Jain M, Kakehasi A, Song Y, Meerwein S, DeMasi R, Suboticki J, Rubbert-Roth A. Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib in TNFi-IR Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis from Three Phase 3 Clinical Trials [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-upadacitinib-in-tnfi-ir-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-from-three-phase-3-clinical-trials/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-upadacitinib-in-tnfi-ir-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-from-three-phase-3-clinical-trials/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology