ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1195

Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Tanezumab in Patients with Knee or Hip Osteoarthritis (NCT01089725)

Charles A. Birbara1, Eugene J. Dabezies2, Aimee M. Burr3, Robert J. Fountaine4, Michael D. Smith3, Mark T. Brown3, Christine R. West3, Rosalinda H. Arends3 and Kenneth M. Verburg3, 1University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, 2Pensacola Research Consultants, Pensacola, FL, 3Pfizer, Inc., Groton, CT, 4Pfizer, Inc., Grotoon, CT

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: monoclonal antibodies, osteoarthritis and pain

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Osteoarthritis – Clinical Aspects Poster I: Clinical Trials and Interventions

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose : Tanezumab (TNZ) is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits nerve growth factor and reduces hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA) pain. A placebo-controlled phase 3 study (NCT01089725), evaluated efficacy of subcutaneous (SC) TNZ (2.5, 5, and 10 mg) and compared therapeutic equivalence of TNZ 10 mg SC to TNZ 10 mg intravenous (IV) every 8 weeks in the treatment of symptomatic OA. Co-primary endpoints were Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) OA Pain and Physical Function Indices and Patient’s Global Assessment of OA (PGAOA) at Week 8.

Methods: Patients (N=379) with knee or hip OA were randomized and treated with placebo (n=72), TNZ 2.5 mg SC (n=74), 5 mg SC (n=63), 10 mg SC (n=86) or 10 mg IV (n=84) every 8 weeks. Efficacy analyses included change from baseline in WOMAC Pain and Physical Function subscales, PGAOA, and percentage of patients with ≥30%, ≥50%, ≥70%, and ≥90% improvement in WOMAC Pain. Safety assessments included adverse event (AE) reporting, physical and neurological examinations, and laboratory tests.

Results: The study discontinued prematurely due to a FDA partial clinical hold on TNZ non-cancer pain studies; thus no statistical testing was conducted. Since <10% of patients received a second dose at Week 8, efficacy results are described for change from baseline to Week 8 only. Mean (standard error [SE]) change from baseline to Week 8 in WOMAC Pain in TNZ groups ranged from −3.59 (0.26) to −3.89 (0.32); versus −2.74 (0.25) with placebo. Percentage of patients with ≥30%, ≥50%, ≥70%, and ≥90% reductions in WOMAC Pain score at Week 8 was greater in all TNZ groups versus placebo (Figure). Mean (SE) change from baseline to Week 8 in WOMAC Physical Function ranged from −3.13 (0.25) to −3.51 (0.28) with TNZ and −2.26 (0.24) with placebo. For PGAO, mean (SE) change from baseline to Week 8 was −0.90 (0.11) to −1.08 (0.12) with TNZ and −0.78 (0.10) with placebo. Inspection of the efficacy-time curves indicated that onset and duration of analgesia with all SC doses were similar to the 10-mg IV dose over the 8-week dosing interval. Overall incidence of all-causality AEs was highest with TNZ 10-mg IV (52.4%) and placebo (51.4%). No AEs of osteonecrosis were reported by investigators. Two placebo-treated patients and 3 TNZ 2.5-mg SC patients underwent total joint replacements. AEs in ≥5% of patients in any treatment group included arthralgia, paresthesia, hypoesthesia, worsening OA, headache, and joint swelling; paresthesia and hypoesthesia occurred only in patients receiving TNZ. Injection site reactions were reported by 4.7%, 3.6%, 2.8%, 2.7% and 0% of those treated with TNZ 10 mg SC, TNZ 10 mg IV, placebo, TNZ 2.5 mg SC and TNZ 5 mg SC, respectively and the majority were mild (none were severe).

Conclusion: SC TNZ provided improvements in Pain, Physical Function, and PGAOA at all doses. Efficacy and safety of SC TNZ were generally similar to IV in patients with OA pain.

 


Disclosure: C. A. Birbara, Forest Laboratories Inc, 8,GlaxoSmithKline, 8,Roche Pharmaceuticals, 8; E. J. Dabezies, None; A. M. Burr, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; R. J. Fountaine, Pfizer Inc, 3; M. D. Smith, Pfizer Inc, 1; M. T. Brown, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; C. R. West, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; R. H. Arends, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; K. M. Verburg, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Birbara CA, Dabezies EJ, Burr AM, Fountaine RJ, Smith MD, Brown MT, West CR, Arends RH, Verburg KM. Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Tanezumab in Patients with Knee or Hip Osteoarthritis (NCT01089725) [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-subcutaneous-tanezumab-in-patients-with-knee-or-hip-osteoarthritis-nct01089725/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-subcutaneous-tanezumab-in-patients-with-knee-or-hip-osteoarthritis-nct01089725/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology