ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: L20

Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Tanezumab for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee

Thomas J. Schnitzer1, Richard Easton2, Shirley Pang3, Dennis Levinson4, Glenn Pixton5, Lars Viktrup6, Isabelle Davignon7, Mark T. Brown7, Kenneth M. Verburg7 and Christine R. West7, 1Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 2Michigan Orthopaedic & Spine Surgeons, Rochester Hills, MI, 3St. Jude Medical Center, Fullerton, CA, 4Chicago Clinical Research Institute, Chicago, IL, 5Pfizer, Inc., Morrisville, NC, 6Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 7Pfizer, Inc., Groton, CT

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: October 4, 2018

Keywords: Late-Breaking 2018, monoclonal antibodies, OA, osteoarthritis and pain management

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: 5T113 Abstracts: Late-Breaking Abstract Session

Session Type: ACR Late-breaking Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:00PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Tanezumab is a humanized mAb that blocks nerve growth factor (NGF) and is in clinical development for chronic pain treatment. Tanezumab administered intravenously has proven efficacy in previous studies of osteoarthritis (OA) pain.

Methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, parallel-group, 40-week study (16-week treatment period; 24-week safety follow-up) was conducted to examine the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) tanezumab administered in two treatment regimens over 16 weeks: fixed-dosing (2.5 mg administered at Baseline and Week 8) and step-up dosing (2.5 mg administered at Baseline and 5 mg at Week 8). This study enrolled OA patients who had not responded to or could not tolerate standard pain treatments. Patients (N = 696) had: OA of the hip or knee based on clinical and radiographic ACR criteria, baseline WOMAC Pain and Physical Function scores of ≥5 (11-point numerical rating scale), baseline Patient’s Global Assessment of OA (PGA-OA) of “fair,” “poor,” or “very poor”, and a history of insufficient pain relief or intolerance to acetaminophen, NSAIDs, and either tramadol or opioids (or were unwilling to take opioids). Co-primary endpoints were change from Baseline to Week 16 in WOMAC Pain subscale, WOMAC Physical Function subscale, and PGA-OA. Safety assessments included adverse event (AE) reporting, physical and neurological examinations, joint x-rays, electrocardiogram, and laboratory tests.   

Results: At Week 16, patients treated with tanezumab 2.5 mg or 2.5/5 mg experienced statistically significant improvement in WOMAC Pain, WOMAC Physical Function, and PGA-OA compared with patients receiving placebo (Table 1). Both tanezumab dosing regimens met the study co-primary endpoints. The most common AEs (≥3% in any treatment group and more frequent in each tanezumab treatment group than in the placebo treatment group) were nasopharyngitis, pain in extremity, and paresthesia. The incidence of serious AEs or withdrawals due to AEs was similar between treatment groups (Table 2). Adjudicated rapidly progressive OA occurred in 1.3% of tanezumab-treated subjects during the 40-week study.

Conclusion: Tanezumab 2.5 mg SC provided significant pain relief and improved both function and PGA-OA versus placebo in OA patients. Increasing the dose to 5 mg at Week 8 was associated with modest additional benefit versus continuation on tanezumab 2.5 mg. This study demonstrates that SC tanezumab may be an effective option for patients who have demonstrated intolerance or incomplete response to standard treatments for OA.

 

Table 1. Change in Baseline to Week 16 in WOMAC Pain subscale, WOMAC Physical Function subscale, and Patient’s Global Assessment of OA.

 

 

placebo

 

tanezumab

2.5 mg

tanezumab

2.5/5 mg

 

N = 232

N = 231

N = 233

WOMAC Paina

 

 

 

Mean (Range) Baseline Pain Score

7.30 (4.2, 10.0)

7.08 (4.8, 10.0)

7.33 (5.0, 10.0)

LS Mean (SE) Change from Baseline

-2.64 (0.23)

-3.23 (0.23)

-3.37 (0.22)

Diff of LS Means (SE)

 

-0.60 (0.24)

-0.73 (0.24)

p-value

 

0.0129

0.0023

 

 

 

 

WOMAC Physical Functionb

 

 

 

Mean (Range) Baseline Physical Function Score

7.38 (4.4, 10.0)

7.18 (5.1, 9.9)

7.39 (3.2, 9.9)

LS Mean (SE) Change from Baseline

-2.56 (0.22)

-3.22 (0.22)

-3.45 (0.22)

Diff of LS Means (SE)

 

-0.66 (0.24)

-0.89 (0.24)

p-value

 

 0.0065

 0.0002

 

 

 

 

PGA-OAc

 

 

 

Mean (Range) Baseline Score

3.46 (3, 5)

3.42 (2, 5)

3.53 (3, 5)

LS Mean (SE) Change from Baseline

-0.65 (0.08)

-0.87 (0.08)

-0.90 (0.08)

Diff of LS Means (SE)

 

-0.22 (0.09)

-0.25 (0.09)

p-value

 

0.0109 

0.0038

  

aWOMAC Pain subscale on an 11-point numerical rating scale; higher score indicates higher pain levels

bWOMAC Physical Function subscale on an 11-point numerical rating scale; higher score indicates worse function

cPGA-OA scale ranges from 1 = “very good” to 5 = “very poor”

 

Table 2. Summary of adverse events and those reported in ≥3% of patients in any treatment group during the Treatment Period.

 

 

placebo

 

tanezumab

2.5 mg

tanezumab

2.5/5 mg

 

N = 232

N = 231

N = 233

Adverse events

 

 

 

Any adverse event, n (%)

115 (49.6)

128 (55.4)

109 (46.8)

Any treatment-related adverse event, n (%)

24 (10.3)

29 (12.6)

22 (9.4)

Any treatment discontinuation due to adverse events, n (%)a

2 (0.9)

0

1 (0.4)

Any study withdrawal due to adverse events, n (%)

2 (0.9)

1 (0.4)

2 (0.9)

Any serious adverse event, n (%)

4 (1.7)

4 (1.7)

4 (1.7)

Adverse event, n (%)

 

 

 

Arthralgia

Nasopharyngitis

Musculoskeletal pain

Back pain

Headache

Fall

Upper respiratory tract infection

Joint swelling

Pain in extremity

Paresthesia

29 (12.5)

8 (3.4)

8 (3.4)

7 (3.0)

7 (3.0)

6 (2.6)

6 (2.6)

4 (1.7)

2 (0.9)

1 (0.4)

19 (8.2)

12 (5.2)

7 (3.0)

10 (4.3)

6 (2.6)

11 (4.8)

7 (3.0)

8 (3.5)

4 (1.7)

8 (3.5)

22 (9.4)

11 (4.7)

2 (0.9)

6 (2.6)

7 (3.0)

5 (2.1)

3 (1.3)

4 (1.7)

7 (3.0)

3 (1.3)

  

aPatients with adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation, but not study withdrawal during the treatment period

 


Disclosure: T. J. Schnitzer, AbbVie Inc., 5, 9,Aptinyx, 5,Genzyme, 5,Eli Lilly and Co., 5, 9,Pfizer, Inc., 5, 9,Regeneron, 5, 9,Vertex, 5,Grunenthal, 9,Radius, 9; R. Easton, Pfizer, Inc., 2; S. Pang, Pfizer, Inc., 5; D. Levinson, None; G. Pixton, Pfizer, Inc., 1, 3; L. Viktrup, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; I. Davignon, Pfizer, Inc., 1, 3; M. T. Brown, Pfizer, Inc., 1, 3; K. M. Verburg, Pfizer, Inc., 1, 3; C. R. West, Pfizer, Inc., 1, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Schnitzer TJ, Easton R, Pang S, Levinson D, Pixton G, Viktrup L, Davignon I, Brown MT, Verburg KM, West CR. Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Tanezumab for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-subcutaneous-tanezumab-for-the-treatment-of-osteoarthritis-of-the-hip-or-knee/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-subcutaneous-tanezumab-for-the-treatment-of-osteoarthritis-of-the-hip-or-knee/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology