ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2545

Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Secukinumab for the Treatment of Active Axial Spondyloarthritis: Results from a Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study

Atul Deodhar1, Jerzy Supronik2, Alan Kivitz3, Guillermo Valenzuela4, Karen Kapur5, Susanne Rohrer6, Eva Dokoupilova7, Hanno Richards6 and Karel Pavelka8, 1Division of Arthritis and Rheumatic Disease, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 2OsteoMedic sc A Racewicz J Supronik, Bialystok, Poland, 3Altoona Center for Clinical Research, Duncansville, PA, 4Integral Rheumatology & Immunology Specialists, Plantation, FL, 5Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, 6Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland, 7Masaryk University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology; MEDICAL PLUS sro, Brno, Czech Republic, 8Institut of Rheumatology and Department of Rheumatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), Biologicals, clinical trial, spondyloarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Title: Abstracts: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment III: AxSpA

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:00PM-5:30PM

Background/Purpose: While subcutaneous secukinumab (SEC) is approved for the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), some patients may benefit more from intravenous (IV) administration. This study investigated the long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of IV SEC in patients with active axSpA.

Methods: INVIGORATE-1 (NCT04156620) is a randomized, double blind, parallel group, phase 3 trial of patients with active axSpA (either radiographic [r]-axSpA or nonradiographic [nr]-axSpA). All patients had inflammatory back pain (ASAS criteria) for ≥6 months with onset before 45 years of age. Patients with r-axSpA fulfilled the modified New York criteria, and patients with nr-axSpA met ASAS criteria and had objective signs of inflammation at screening (positive MRI and/or elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (≥5 mg/L for nr-axSpA; ≥10 mg/L for r-axSpA). Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive IV SEC (6 mg/kg at baseline followed by 3 mg/kg every 4 weeks) or placebo (PBO) for 16 weeks. After Week 16, patients randomized to PBO were switched to IV SEC (3 mg/kg every 4 weeks), while patients randomized to SEC continued receiving IV SEC through Week 52. The primary endpoint was ASAS40 response at Week 16. Efficacy was assessed through Week 52 by the proportion of patients achieving ASAS40 response, ASDAS-CRP major improvement, and ASAS5/6 response, and by change from baseline in BASDAI, BASFI, and SF-36 PCS. Safety was evaluated through Week 60. Efficacy data through Week 16 are reported using nonresponder imputation; efficacy data from Week 20 through Week 52 are reported as observed.

Results: Demographics and baseline characteristics were balanced across treatment groups (Table 1). Among patients randomized to IV SEC (n=264) or PBO/IV SEC (n=262), 86.0% and 88.9% completed the entire study period, respectively. A total of 413 patients had r-axSpA and 113 patients had nr-axSpA. SEC treatment resulted in rapid and sustained improvement in ASAS40 response rates in patients randomized to SEC (Figure 1). By Week 24, patients who switched from PBO to SEC at Week 16 achieved comparable ASAS40 response rates to those of patients originally randomized to SEC. ASAS40 responses were maintained through Week 52 for both groups (SEC, 66.8%; PBO/IV SEC, 74.9% [observed data]). SEC treatment also resulted in rapid improvements in all other efficacy measures that were maintained through Week 52 (Table 2). Through Week 16, the incidences of adverse events (AEs; 38.6% vs 39.1%), serious AEs (2.7% vs 1.1%), and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation (1.9% vs 0.4%) were similar for patients receiving SEC or PBO, respectively. Among patients receiving any IV SEC through the entire study period, 63.2%, 6.0%, and 3.5% reported any AE, serious AEs, and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation, respectively. One death occurred during SEC treatment due to a suspected myocardial infarction and was deemed not related to treatment.

Conclusion: IV SEC was safe and effective for treatment of adults with active axSpA over 52 weeks. The safety profile of IV SEC for patients with axSpA was consistent with that of previous reports for subcutaneous SEC, and no new safety signals were observed.

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Patient demographics and baseline disease characteristics.

Supporting image 2

Table 2. Achievement of efficacy responses and improvements in disease measures from baseline at Week 52 (observed data).

Supporting image 3

Figure 1. Proportions of patients with axSpA who achieved ASAS40 through Week 16 (nonresponder imputation) and through Week 52 (observed data).


Disclosures: A. Deodhar: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, Aurinia, 2, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Celgene, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 6, MoonLake, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5; J. Supronik: Samsung Bioepis, 5; A. Kivitz: AbbVie, 6, Amgen, 6, 11, Chemocentryx, 1, Eli Lilly, 6, Fresenius Kabi, 2, Genzyme, 2, Gilead, 2, 11, GlaxoSmithKlein (GSK), 2, 6, 11, Grunenthal, 2, Horizon, 1, 2, Janssen, 1, 2, Novartis, 4, 11, Pfizer, 2, 6, 11, Selecta, 2, Synact, 2, Takeda, 2, UCB, 1, 6; G. Valenzuela: Abbvie, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 12, Investigator, Celgene, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Janssen, 2, Merck/MSD, 2, MLKCDT, 12, Investigator, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 2, Sanofi, 2, UCB, 2; K. Kapur: Novartis, 3, 11; S. Rohrer: Novartis, 3, 11; E. Dokoupilova: AbbVie/Abbott, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, Galapagos NV, 5, Gilead, 5, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 5, Hexal, 5, Janssen, 5, Novartis, 5, Pfizer, 5, Samsung Bioepis, 5, Sanofi, 5, UCB, 5; H. Richards: Novartis, 3, 11; K. Pavelka: Abbvie, 2, 6, Amgen, 2, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 6, Egis, 2, 6, MSD, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, Roche, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Deodhar A, Supronik J, Kivitz A, Valenzuela G, Kapur K, Rohrer S, Dokoupilova E, Richards H, Pavelka K. Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Secukinumab for the Treatment of Active Axial Spondyloarthritis: Results from a Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-intravenous-secukinumab-for-the-treatment-of-active-axial-spondyloarthritis-results-from-a-randomized-double-blind-phase-3-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-intravenous-secukinumab-for-the-treatment-of-active-axial-spondyloarthritis-results-from-a-randomized-double-blind-phase-3-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology