ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 471

Efficacy and Safety of Golimumab As Add-On Therapy to Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs

Bernard Combe1, Bhaskar Dasgupta2, Ingrid Louw3, Sarvajeet Pal4, Jürgen Wollenhaupt5, Cristiano Zerbini6, Andre D. Beaulieu7, Hendrik Schulze-Koops8, Patrick Durez9, Ruji Yao10, Nathan Vastesaeger11 and Holly Weng10, 1Hôpital Lapeyronie-Service d'Immuno-rhumatologie, Montpellier, France, 2Rheumatology, Southend University Hospital, Westcliff-on-Sea, United Kingdom, 3Panorama Medical Centre, Cape Town, South Africa, 4Advance Rheumatology Clinic, Hyderabad, India, 5Schön-Klinik, Hamburg, Germany, 6Centro Paulista de Investigações, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 7Bureau 140, Centre de Rhumatologie, St. Louis, QC, Canada, 8University of Munich, Munich, Germany, 9UCL Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium, 10Merck Sharp & Dohme, Kenilworth, NJ, 11Merck Sharp & Dohme, Brussels, Belgium

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: This study evaluated golimumab (GLM) as add-on therapy in patients with active RA despite treatment with non-biologic DMARDs. Two GLM treatment strategies (subcutaneous [SC] vs intravenous [IV]/SC combination) for induction and maintenance of remission were evaluated.

Methods: GO-MORE was an open-label, multinational, prospective study in biologic-naïve patients with active RA (DAS28-ESR ≥3.2). In Part I, patients received 50-mg SC GLM once monthly for 6 months. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with good or moderate EULAR DAS28-ESR response at 6 months. Effects of several variables on response were evaluated: MTX dosage, type of concomitant DMARDs, corticosteroid (CS) use, and number of failed DMARDs. In Part II, patients who achieved good or moderate response but not remission at 6 months were eligible for random assignment to treatment up to month 12 with either continued 50-mg SC GLM once monthly or a combination of IV GLM and SC GLM. The coprimary efficacy endpoints in Part II were the percentage of patients with EULAR DAS28-ESR remission at the beginning of month 11 and the end of month 12. Treatment effects were evaluated with chi-square tests.

Results: At baseline of Part I, 3280 efficacy-evaluable patients had mean age 52.3 (SD=12.8) years, median disease duration 4.9 years, mean HAQ-DI 1.44 (SD= 0.67), and mean DAS28-ESR 5.97 (SD=1.10). Concomitant MTX was used by 81.1% of patients; concomitant CSs by 63.4% of patients. 34.4%, 35.9%, and 29.7% of patients failed 1, 2, and 3 DMARDs, respectively. At month 6, 82.07% (2692/3280) of patients achieved a good or moderate EULAR DAS28-ESR response and 23.90% (784/3280) achieved remission. No statistically or clinically significant differences were seen when treatment response was compared for patients who received concomitant MTX or CS vs those who did not, for high- vs low-dose MTX, or for patients who failed multiple vs only 1 DMARD. In Part II, 490 responders who were not in remission were evaluable for efficacy. The 2 treatment arms had similar DAS28-ESR remission rates at the month-11 and -12 endpoints (ranging from 24% to 27%) and were similar in the time to first remission. GLM was generally well tolerated. Observed SAEs were consistent with those observed in RA patients treated with anti-TNF agents. In Part 1, SAEs occurred in 5.7% of patients and 10 deaths (0.2%) occurred. In Part II, SAEs occurred in 6.9% and 2.4% of patients in the IV/SC and SC arms, respectively, and 1 death occurred in the IV/SC arm.

Conclusion: In patients with active RA despite DMARD therapy, addition of GLM 50-mg once monthly resulted in moderate or good EULAR DAS28 response at 6 months for 82.07% of patients. Response to GLM was not impacted by use of concomitant MTX or CS, dose of concomitant MTX, or number of failed DMARDs. Of patients with response but not remission at month 6, approximately 25% achieved remission after 6 additional months of GLM treatment. The IV/SC regimen provided no additional efficacy over the SC regimen and was associated with a higher incidence of AEs. The safety profile for the SC regimen was consistent with previous studies of GLM.


Disclosure:

B. Combe,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

5;

B. Dasgupta,

EULAR, ACR, Health Technology Assessment, British Heart Foundation, Research for Patient benefits UK, Napp ,

2,

Schering Plough, Merck, Roche, Mundipharma, Astra Zeneca,

9,

Schering Plough, Merck, Roche, Mundipharma, Astra Zeneca,

5;

I. Louw,
None;

S. Pal,
None;

J. Wollenhaupt,

MSD,

5,

MSD,

8;

C. Zerbini,

Novartis, Pfizer, Bristol, Lilly, Amgen, and MSD,

2,

Pfizer, Bristol, Lilly, and MSD,

5,

Pfizer and Bristol,

6;

A. D. Beaulieu,

Merck, Servier, Amgen, Abbott, Pfizer, and Roche,

9;

H. Schulze-Koops,

Abbott, Actelion, Biotest, BMS, Chugai, Essex, GSK, MSD, Medac, Merck, Mundai Pharma, Novartis, Nycomed, Pfizer, Roche, UCB,

5, 9,

Abbott, Actelion, Biotest, BMS, Chugai, Essex, GSK, MSD, Medac, Merck, Mundai Pharma, Novartis, Nycomed, Pfizer, Roche, UCB,

8,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

9;

P. Durez,
None;

R. Yao,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

3;

N. Vastesaeger,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

3;

H. Weng,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-golimumab-as-add-on-therapy-to-disease-modifying-antirheumatic-drugs/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology