ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 927

Efficacy and Safety of Filgotinib for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Naïve to Methotrexate Therapy: FINCH3 Primary Outcome Results

Rene Westhovens1, William F.C. Rigby 2, Désirée van der Heijde 3, Daniel W.T. Ching 4, Beatrix Bartok 5, Franziska Matzkies 5, Zhaoyu Yin 5, Ying Guo 5, Chantal Tasset 6, John Sundy 5, Neelufar Mozaffarian 5, Osvaldo Daniel Messina 7, Robert B.M. Landewé 8, Tatsuya Atsumi 9 and Gerd Burmester 10, 1University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium, 2Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, 3Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 4Timaru Hospital, Timaru, New Zealand, 5Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA, 6Galapagos NV, Mechelen, Belgium, 7Cosme Argerich Hospital and IRO Medical Center, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 8Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 9Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan, 10Charité—University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: RCT and Janus kinase (JAK), Rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: 3S109: RA – Treatments II: Novel Treatments for RA (927–932)

Session Type: ACR Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Filgotinib (FIL), an orally administered, potent, selective inhibitor of Janus kinase 1 (JAK1), has shown good efficacy and was well tolerated for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The objective of this study is to compare efficacy and safety of FIL with and without methotrexate (MTX) in patients with RA who were naïve to MTX therapy.

Methods: This phase 3, double-blind, active-controlled study randomized patients with moderately to severely active RA (2:1:1:2) to FIL 200mg daily + MTX weekly (up to 20mg), FIL 100mg + MTX, FIL 200mg (+placebo [PBO]), or MTX (+PBO) for up to 52 weeks; results through week 24 are presented. Primary efficacy endpoint was proportion of patients achieving ACR20 response at week 24; additional assessments included ACR50 and ACR70 responses; DAS28-CRP score ≤3.2 and < 2.6, and changes in van der Heijde mTSS, HAQ-DI, SF-36 PCS, and FACIT-Fatigue. Safety endpoints included types and rates of adverse events (AEs). Logistic regression adjusting for stratification factors with nonresponder imputation was used for treatment comparisons for ACR response and other binary endpoints. Mixed-effect model adjusting for baseline value, stratification factors, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as fixed effects with observed cases was used for continuous endpoints.

Results: Of 1,252 randomized patients, 1,249 received study drug (416 FIL 200mg+MTX; 207 FIL 100mg+MTX; 210 FIL 200mg monotherapy; 416 MTX monotherapy) and were analyzed; 1,130 completed week 24. Most (76.9%) were female; mean time since RA diagnosis was 2.2 years (median 0.4 years); mean (standard deviation [SD]) DAS28-CRP was 5.7 (1.0); and 35.9% were using oral steroids at baseline. At week 24, significantly more patients in the FIL 200mg+MTX (81.0%; P< 0.001) and FIL 100mg+MTX (80.2%; P< 0.05) arms achieved an ACR20 response compared to MTX monotherapy (71.4%)(Table 1). Compared to MTX monotherapy, more patients receiving FIL with or without MTX achieved ACR50 and ACR70 responses, DAS28-CRP < 2.6 and ≤3.2, and reported improvements in SF-36 PCS (Table 1). The onset of activity was rapid, with significantly more patients achieving ACR50 and DAS28-CRP < 2.6 with FIL than MTX at week 2. The FIL safety profile was consistent with prior studies through week 24 (Table 2).

Conclusion: The JAK1 inhibitor FIL in combination with MTX led to significant improvements in RA signs and symptoms, physical function, and patient-reported outcomes compared to MTX alone and was well tolerated in patients with early active RA naïve to MTX. Clinically meaningful response to FIL occurred as early as 2 weeks after treatment initiation.


ACR 2019 Finch 3 LBA_FINAL_TABLE 1


ACR 2019 Finch 3 LBA_FINAL_TABLE 2


Disclosure: R. Westhovens, Celltrion, 5, 8, 9, Celltrion, Inc., 2, 5, Galapagos, 5, 8, Galapagos NV, 5, 9, Galapagos/Gilead, 2, 5, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 5, 8, 9; W. Rigby, Abbvie, 5, AbbVie, 5, BMS, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 5, Pfizer, 5, Roche, 5; D. van der Heijde, AbbVie, 5, AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, BMS, 5, Amgen, 5, Astellas, 5, 9, Astellas Pharma, 5, AstraZeneca, 5, BMS, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Daiichi, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB, 5, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, Celgene, 5, Daiichi, 5, 9, Daiichi Sankyo, 5, Director of Imaging Rheumatology, 6, Director of Imaging Rheumatology bv, 9, Eli Lilly, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, Eli-Lilly, 5, Galapagos, 5, Gilead, 5, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, 5, GSK, 5, 8, Imaging Rheumatology bv, 9, Imaging Rheumatology BV, 9, Imaging Rheumatology bv., 9, Janssen, 5, 8, Janssen Pharmaceutica, 5, Merck, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Pfizer Inc, 5, Regeneron, 5, 8, Rheumatology bv, 4, 9, Roche, 5, 8, Sanofi, 5, 8, Takeda, 5, 8, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, 5, UCB, 5, 8, UCB Pharma, 5; D. Ching, AbbVie, 5; B. Bartok, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 3, 4; F. Matzkies, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 1, 3, 4; Z. Yin, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 3, 4; Y. Guo, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 3, 4; C. Tasset, Galapagos, 1, 3, Galapagos NV, 3, 4; J. Sundy, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 3, 4; N. Mozaffarian, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 1, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, 3; O. Messina, None; R. Landewé, Abbott, 2, 5, 8, Abbott, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Centocor, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Schering-Plough, UCB, Wyeth, 8, Abbott, Amgen, Centocor, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Schering-Plough, UCB, Wyeth, 2, AbbVie, 5, Abbvie, 5, 8, AbbVie, Ablynx, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Centocor, GSK, Novartis, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Schering- Plough, UCB, Wyeth, 5, Ablynx, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, 8, AstraZeneca, 5, BMS, 5, 8, Bristol Myers Squibb, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, Celgene, 5, 8, Centocor, 2, 5, 8, Director of Rheumatology Consultancy BV, which is a registered company under Dutch law, 6, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, Eli-Lilly, 5, 8, Galapagos, 5, 8, Gilead, 5, 8, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, Merck, 5, 8, MSD, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Rheumatology bv, 4, Rheumatology Consultancy BV, 9, Roche, 2, 5, 8, Schering-Plough, 2, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8, UCB Pharma, 2, 5, 8, Wyeth, 2, 5, 8; T. Atsumi, AbbVie, 5, 8, Abbvie, 5, 8, Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation, 8, Astellas Pharma, 8, 9, Astellas Pharma Inc, 8, AstraZeneca, 5, AstraZeneca plc, 5, 8, Bayer Yakuhin, 8, Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd., 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 8, 9, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, 8, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., 8, 9, Daiichi Sankyo, 8, 9, Daiichi Sankyo Co Ltd, 8, Eisai Co., Ltd, 8, Eli Lilly and Company, 8, 9, Eli Lilly Japan KK, 8, Elsai Co Ltd, 8, Gilead Sciences, 8, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 8, MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL LABORATORIES CO., 5, Medical and Biological Laboratories Co Ltd, 5, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, 8, 9, Nippon Shinyaku Co., 8, Novartis, 5, Novartis Pharma KK, 5, Ono Pharmaceutical, 5, ONO Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, 5, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, 8, Pfizer, 5, 9, Pfizer Inc, 5, 8, Sanofi, 9, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, 8, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, 8; G. Burmester, AbbVie, 5, 8, Abbvie, 5, 8, AbbVie Inc, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Roche, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma., 5, 8, AbbVie Inc., 5, 8, BMS, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, Gilead, 5, 8, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, Lilly, 5, 8, Merck, 5, 8, Merck Shar & Dohme, 5, 8, MSD, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Roche, 2, 5, 8, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, 5, 8, Sanofi, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8, Union Chimique Belge, 2, 5, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Westhovens R, Rigby W, van der Heijde D, Ching D, Bartok B, Matzkies F, Yin Z, Guo Y, Tasset C, Sundy J, Mozaffarian N, Messina O, Landewé R, Atsumi T, Burmester G. Efficacy and Safety of Filgotinib for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Naïve to Methotrexate Therapy: FINCH3 Primary Outcome Results [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-filgotinib-for-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-naive-to-methotrexate-therapy-finch3-primary-outcome-results/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-filgotinib-for-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-naive-to-methotrexate-therapy-finch3-primary-outcome-results/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology