ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: L03

Efficacy and Safety of Deucravacitinib (BMS-986165), an Oral, Selective Tyrosine Kinase 2 Inhibitor, in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis: Results from a Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Philip Mease1, Atul Deodhar2, Désirée van der Heijde3, Frank Behrens4, Alan Kivitz5, Jonghyeon Kim6, Shalabh Singhal6, Miroslawa Nowak6 and Subhashis Banerjee6, 1Swedish Medical Center/Providence St. Joseph Health and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 2Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 3Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 4CIRI/Rheumatology and Fraunhofer Institute IME, Translational Medicine and Pharmacology, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany, 5Department of Rheumatology, Altoona Center for Clinical Research, Duncansville, PA, 6Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Date of first publication: October 23, 2020

Keywords: Inflammation, Late-Breaking 2020, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2020

Title: Late-Breaking Posters

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) is an intracellular kinase that mediates signaling by key cytokines involved in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) pathophysiology. Deucravacitinib (BMS-986165) is a novel oral agent that selectively inhibits TYK2 through an allosteric mechanism by binding to the regulatory domain of TYK2 in contrast to inhibitors of the closely related Janus kinases (JAK1–3) that bind to the active site in the kinase domain.1 In a previous Phase 2 trial in plaque psoriasis (PsO), 67%–75% of patients who received deucravacitinib ≥3 mg twice daily achieved PASI 75 at 12 weeks versus 7% for placebo (PBO; P< 0.001).2 No deucravacitinib-related serious adverse events (AEs) were observed.2 The current trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib in PsA.

Methods: This is an ongoing, 1-year, randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled (initial 16 weeks), multicenter, Phase 2 trial (NCT03881059). Eligible patients had a PsA diagnosis for ≥6 months, met CASPAR criteria, and had active disease (≥3 tender and ≥3 swollen joints), C‑reactive protein ≥3 mg/L (ULN, 5 mg/L), and ≥1 psoriatic lesion (≥2 cm). Patients had failed or were intolerant (IR) to ≥1 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, corticosteroid, and/or conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD), or 1 TNF inhibitor (TNFi; ≤30%). Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to deucravacitinib 6 mg once daily (QD) or 12 mg QD, or PBO. The primary endpoint was ACR 20 response at Week 16. Key secondary endpoints included improvement from baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire–Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and Short Form-36 Physical Component Score (SF-36 PCS). Additional endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving ACR 50/70, HAQ-DI response (≥0.35 improvement from baseline), minimal disease activity, enthesitis resolution (Leeds Index), and AEs.

Results: Of 203 patients randomized, 180 (89%) completed 16 weeks of treatment. Demographic and baseline disease characteristics were similar across the 3 groups. Mean age was 49.8 years, median PsA duration was 4.5 years, 66% of patients were using csDMARDs at baseline, and 15% were TNFi-IR. The study met its primary objective of showing a dose-response relationship (P< 0.001), with both deucravacitinib 6 mg (n=70) and 12 mg QD (n=67) demonstrating significantly greater ACR 20 responses versus PBO (n=66) at Week 16 (52.9% and 62.7% versus 31.8%, respectively; Figure 1). Key secondary objectives were achieved with significant and generally similar improvements in secondary endpoints for both deucravacitinib doses versus PBO (Figure 2). Nasopharyngitis, sinusitis, headache, and rash were the most common AEs in deucravacitinib-treated patients (Table). Most AEs were mild or moderate. No serious AEs were reported in deucravacitinib-treated patients, including no serious infections, herpes zoster, opportunistic infections, or thrombotic events.

Conclusion: Deucravacitinib was efficacious versus PBO over 16 weeks of treatment in patients with active PsA. Treatment was well tolerated and the safety profile was consistent with that observed in the Phase 2 PsO trial.2

References

  1. Burke JR et al. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11:1-16.
  2. Papp K et al. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1313-21.


Disclosure: P. Mease, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Amgen, 2, 5, 8, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, 5, 8, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Galapagos, 2, 5, 8, Gilead, 2, 5, 8, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, 5, 8, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, SUN Pharma, 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8; A. Deodhar, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5, AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, Celgene, 5, Janssen, 5, Galapagos, 5, Gilead, 2, 5; D. van der Heijde, AbbVie, 5, Amgen, 5, Astellas, 5, AstraZeneca, 5, Bayer, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Celgene, 5, Cyxone, 5, Daiichi, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, Galapagos, 5, Gilead, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, Janssen, 5, Merck, 5, Novartis, 5, Pfizer Inc, 5, Regeneron, 5, Roche, 5, Sanofi, 5, Takeda, 5, UCB, 5, Imaging Rheumatology BV, 3; F. Behrens, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Chugai, 2, 5, 8, Celgene, 2, 5, 8, Roche, 2, 5, 8, AbbVie, 5, 8, Sanofi, 5, 8, Lilly, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Genzyme, 5, 8, Boehringer, 5, 8, Bristol Myers Squibb, 5, 8, MSD, 5, 8, UCB Pharma, 5, 8; A. Kivitz, Pfizer, 1, 5, 8, Sanofi, 1, 5, 8, GlaxoSmithKline, 1, Gilead Sciences, Inc, 1, 5, Novartis, 1, 8, AbbVie, 5, 8, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Flexion, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, Regeneron, 5, SUN Pharma Advanced Research, 5, Celgene, 8, Merck, 8, Lilly, 8, Genzyme, 8; J. Kim, Bristol Myers Squibb, 1; S. Singhal, Bristol Myers Squibb, 1; M. Nowak, Bristol Myers Squibb, 1; S. Banerjee, Bristol Myers Squibb, 1.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mease P, Deodhar A, van der Heijde D, Behrens F, Kivitz A, Kim J, Singhal S, Nowak M, Banerjee S. Efficacy and Safety of Deucravacitinib (BMS-986165), an Oral, Selective Tyrosine Kinase 2 Inhibitor, in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis: Results from a Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-deucravacitinib-bms-986165-an-oral-selective-tyrosine-kinase-2-inhibitor-in-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis-results-from-a-phase-2-randomized-double-blind-plac/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-deucravacitinib-bms-986165-an-oral-selective-tyrosine-kinase-2-inhibitor-in-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis-results-from-a-phase-2-randomized-double-blind-plac/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology