ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1197

Efficacy and Safety of a Single Intra-Articular Injection of MM-II, a Novel Suspension of Large, Empty, Multilamellar Liposomes, in People with Painful Knee OA: Results of a 26-Week, Phase 2b, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial

Schnitzer Thomas1, Helene Rovsing2, Edith Lau3, Sidsel Boll4, Ballari Brahmachari5, Richard Chou6, Tarini Joshi5, Roni Wechsler7, Siu-Long Yao5, Sveta Weiner5, Asger Bihlet8 and Philip Conaghan9, 1Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 2Sanos Clinic, Gandrup, Denmark, 3Hong Kong Center for Clinical Research, Hong Kong, China, 4Sanos Clinic, Vejle, Denmark, 5Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., Princeton, NJ, 6Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 7Moebius Medical, Tel Aviv, Israel, 8NBCD, Soeborg, Denmark, 9University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: clinical trial, Osteoarthritis, pain, Randomized Trial, WOMAC

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 13, 2023

Title: (1183–1199) Osteoarthritis – Clinical Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Safe and effective therapies are needed for OA pain. MM-II, a novel suspension of large, empty, multilamellar liposomes composed of dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine and dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine, effectively reduced cartilage degeneration in OA animal models administered weekly IA injections. A single IA injection of MM-II lowered knee pain in OA patients for up to 3 months in a first-in-human study. This phase 2b study evaluated dosing, safety, and efficacy of MM-II through 26 weeks in patients with symptomatic knee OA.

Methods: Consenting patients were enrolled in a 6-arm, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled, 26-week trial evaluating one IA injection of 1, 3, and 6 mL of MM-II (150 mM lipids) and corresponding volumes of PBO. Key inclusion criteria were age ≥40 years, radiographic Kellgren-Lawrence grades 2 or 3 in the index knee, ACR criteria for OA, WOMAC A pain level ≥2/4 within 24 hours of baseline (BL), index knee visual analog scale pain score of 50 to 90 mm for ≥5/7 days prior to BL, and intolerance or inadequate response to NSAIDs or acetaminophen. Patients with moderate to large effusions in the index knee or with moderate to severe pain in another joint were excluded. The primary endpoint was change in WOMAC A pain score at week 12; secondary endpoints included change from BL in WOMAC A pain, weekly average daily knee pain score, and use of rescue medication. Randomization was stratified by BMI and BL index knee pain. The primary endpoint was analyzed for all patients who received MM-II or PBO (full analysis set) using mixed models for repeated measures. Treatment differences were estimated with least square means (LSM), and multiplicity-adjusted P-values were calculated for MM-II vs PBO 3 mL WOMAC A scores using step-down Dunnett’s hierarchical testing. Nominal P-values were not adjusted for multiplicity.

Results: Of 397 enrolled patients, 258 (65.0%) were female and 266 (67.0%) were White. Mean age and BMI were 62.7 years (standard deviation [SD], 8.1) and 30.8 kg/m2 (SD, 6.1), respectively. Treatment groups did not significantly differ at BL. Overall, 7.1% of patients discontinued the study. At week 12, LSM change from BL WOMAC A pain was −0.24 for the MM-II 3 mL group (95% confidence interval [CI], −0.476 to −0.004; P = 0.085), −0.16 for the 1 mL group (95% CI, −0.390 to 0.061; P = 0.850), and −0.02 for the MM-II 6 mL group (95% CI, −0.269 to 0.222; P = 0.850). In the 3 mL group, results were sustained until week 26 with nominal significance at 2 time points (Figure 1). When comparing MM-II 3 mL to the pooled PBO groups, LSM difference in change from BL of WOMAC A pain at week 12 was −0.28 (95% CI, −0.484 to −0.068; P = 0.018). LSM differences in weekly average daily pain scores for the MM-II 3 mL group were nominally significant from week 6 through 26 (nominal P < 0.05 for all; Figure 2). Changes in rescue medication use reflected changes in symptoms. Treatment-emergent serious adverse events (AEs) were reported in 2.67% of MM-II and 2.99% of PBO patients; incidence of injection site AEs were 1.91% and 2.99%, respectively.

Conclusion: MM-II treatment was well tolerated and may provide durable, clinically relevant pain relief. These data support phase 3 studies.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1. Change in baseline WOMAC A pain score over time. Data points represent least square means; error bars represent standard error. *P <0.05, multiplicity-unadjusted pairwise comparison of MM-II 3 mL to PBO 3 mL.
PBO, placebo.

Supporting image 2

Figure 2. Change from baseline weekly average of daily pain over time. Data points represent least square means; error bars represent standard error. *P <0.05, 1 mL MM-II vs 3 mL PBO (not adjusted for multiplicity); ‡P <0.05, 3 mL MM-II vs 3 mL PBO (not adjusted for multiplicity).
PBO, placebo; VAS, visual analog scale.


Disclosures: S. Thomas: AstraZenica, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, Horizon, 2, IBSA Group, 2, Merck, 2, Moebius Medical, 2, Orion, 2, Paradigm Biopharmaceuticals, 5, Pfizer, 1, 2, Regeneron, 2, Xalud Therapeutics, 2; H. Rovsing: None; E. Lau: None; S. Boll: None; B. Brahmachari: Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc, 3, 11; R. Chou: Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc, 2; T. Joshi: Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc, 3, 11; R. Wechsler: Moebius Medical, 3, 11; S. Yao: Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc, 3, 11; S. Weiner: Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc, 3, 11; A. Bihlet: NBCD, 8, Nordic Biosciences, 3, 11; P. Conaghan: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Galapagos, 2, Genascense, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Grunenthal, 2, Janssen, 2, Levicept, 2, Merck/MSD, 2, Moebius Medical, 2, Novartis, 2, 6, Stryker, 2, Takeda, 2, TrialSpark, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Thomas S, Rovsing H, Lau E, Boll S, Brahmachari B, Chou R, Joshi T, Wechsler R, Yao S, Weiner S, Bihlet A, Conaghan P. Efficacy and Safety of a Single Intra-Articular Injection of MM-II, a Novel Suspension of Large, Empty, Multilamellar Liposomes, in People with Painful Knee OA: Results of a 26-Week, Phase 2b, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-a-single-intra-articular-injection-of-mm-ii-a-novel-suspension-of-large-empty-multilamellar-liposomes-in-people-with-painful-knee-oa-results-of-a-26-week-phase-2b-placebo/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-a-single-intra-articular-injection-of-mm-ii-a-novel-suspension-of-large-empty-multilamellar-liposomes-in-people-with-painful-knee-oa-results-of-a-26-week-phase-2b-placebo/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology