ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1352

Effects of Upadacitinib on Patient-Reported Outcomes After 24 Weeks in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Conventional Synthetic or Biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs: Results from SELECT-NEXT and SELECT-BEYOND Phase 3 Studies

Martin Bergman1, Namita Tundia 2, Heidi Camp 2, Sebastian Meerwein 3, Casey Schlacher 2, Debbie Goldschmidt 4, Yan Song 5 and Vibeke Strand 6, 1Drexel University College of Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden, 2AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, 3AbbVie GmbH Co. KG, Ludwigshafen, Germany, Wiesbaden, Germany, 4Analysis Group, Inc., New York, NY, 5Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, 6Division of Immunology/Rheumatology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Janus kinase (JAK), patient-reported outcome measures, physical function, quality of life and rheumatoid arthritis, treatment

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: RA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster II: Treatments, Outcomes, & Measures

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Treatment with upadacitinib (UPA), a selective Janus kinase-1 (JAK-1) inhibitor, resulted in significant and clinically meaningful improvements in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at Week 12 in patients with RA with inadequate responses to csDMARDs (csDMARD-IR) or bDMARDs (bDMARD-IR).1,2 The current analysis evaluated the potential long-term benefits of UPA on PROs in these patients.

Methods: SELECT-NEXT (NCT02675426) and SELECT-BEYOND (NCT02706847) are ongoing Phase 3, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which randomized patients with active RA on a stable dose of csDMARDs to receive UPA 15 mg or 30 mg once daily (QD) for 24 weeks or placebo for 12 weeks then UPA 15 mg or 30 mg. In this analysis, we report on PROs in patients treated with UPA from the start of study for 24 weeks, including: Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA), pain by visual analog scale (VAS), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F; SELECT-NEXT only), and duration and severity of morning (AM) stiffness. Mean changes from baseline and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each PRO at Week 24. The percentages of patients who continued to report improvements ≥ minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) at Week 24 were calculated among patients who reported clinically meaningful responses for a given PRO at Week 12.

Results: Overall, 622 and 434 patients completed the double-blind phase of SELECT-NEXT and SELECT-BEYOND, respectively. At Week 24, patients reported improvements from baseline across all PROs: PtGA, pain VAS, HAQ-DI, FACIT-F, duration and severity of AM stiffness in SELECT-NEXT (Table 1) and SELECT-BEYOND (Table 2). In SELECT-NEXT, 85% to 93% of patients treated with UPA 15 mg and 77% to 90% with UPA 30 mg maintained responses ≥ MCIDs from Week 12 to Week 24. Similarly, in SELECT-BEYOND, 66% to 88% of patients treated with UPA 15 mg and 70% to 86% with UPA 30 mg maintained clinically meaningful responses from Week 12 to Week 24.

Conclusion: Substantial and clinically meaningful improvements in disease activity, physical function, pain, fatigue, and AM stiffness were consistently reported over 24 weeks in csDMARD-IR and difficult-to-treat bDMARD-IR patients with active RA who continued to receive UPA 15 mg or 30 mg QD.

References: 1. Strand V, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77(Suppl 2):A989; 2. Strand V et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77(Suppl 2):A990.

Medical writing services provided by Emily Mercadante of JK Associates, Inc. (a member of the Fishawack Group of companies; Conshohocken, PA) and funded by AbbVie.


Disclosure: M. Bergman, Abbvie, 5, 8, AbbVie, 5, 8, AbbVie, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Genentech, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, 5, AbbVie, Celgene Corporation, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, 8, Amgen, 5, 8, BMS, 5, 8, Celgene, 5, 8, Genentech, 5, Genentech/Roche, 5, 8, Genentech-Roche, 5, Gilead, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 8, GSK, 8, Horizon, 5, Janssen, 5, 8, JNJ (parent of Janssen), 1, JNJ stock, 1, Johnson & Johnson, 1, 4, Johnson and Johnson, 1, Merck, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Sandoz, 5, Sanofi, 5, 8, Sanofi/Regeneron, 5, 8, Sanofi-Regeneron, 5, 8; N. Tundia, AbbVie, 1, 3; H. Camp, AbbVie, 1, 3, 4, Abbvie Inc, 1, 4; S. Meerwein, AbbVie, 3, 4, Abbvie Inc, 1, 4; C. Schlacher, AbbVie, 3, 4; D. Goldschmidt, Analysis Group, Inc., 3, 9; Y. Song, Analysis Group, Inc., 3, 9; V. Strand, Abbvie, 5, AbbVie, 5, Amgen, 5, Amgen, Abbvie, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celltrion, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Samsung, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, 5, AstraZeneca, 5, AURA, 8, Bayer, 5, BMS, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Celgene, 5, Celltrion, 5, Cleveland Clinic, 8, CORRONA, 5, Crescendo, 5, Crescendo Bioscience, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, EMD Serono, 5, Genentech, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, GSK, 5, Horizon, 5, Inmedix, 5, Janssen, 5, Kezar, 5, Lilly, 5, Merck, 5, NACCME, 8, Novartis, 5, Pfizer, 5, Purdue, 8, RA Forum, 8, RAN, 8, Regeneron, 5, Roche, 5, Samsung, 5, Sandoz, 5, Sanofi, 5, Servier, 5, Setpoint, 5, SLRA, 8, UCB, 5, Up to Date, 7, Washington University, 8, WIR, 8, WRA, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Bergman M, Tundia N, Camp H, Meerwein S, Schlacher C, Goldschmidt D, Song Y, Strand V. Effects of Upadacitinib on Patient-Reported Outcomes After 24 Weeks in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Conventional Synthetic or Biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs: Results from SELECT-NEXT and SELECT-BEYOND Phase 3 Studies [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effects-of-upadacitinib-on-patient-reported-outcomes-after-24-weeks-in-patients-with-active-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-an-inadequate-response-to-conventional-synthetic-or-biologic-disease-modifying-anti/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effects-of-upadacitinib-on-patient-reported-outcomes-after-24-weeks-in-patients-with-active-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-an-inadequate-response-to-conventional-synthetic-or-biologic-disease-modifying-anti/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology