ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2487

Effects of Tofacitinib on Health Care Resource Utilization and Work Productivity in US Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

V. Strand1, R. Riese2, R. Gerber2, D. Gruben2, A.G. Bushmakin2, E.Y. Mahgoub3 and G. Wallenstein2, 1Biopharmaceutical Consultant, Portola Valley, CA, 2Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, 3Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Health Assessment Questionnaire, rheumatoid arthritis, tofacitinib and work, treatment, Work Disability

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy: Therapeutic Strategies, Biomarkers and Predictors of Outcomes in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Here we describe health care resource utilization (HCRU) and work productivity in RA patients from the US treated with tofacitinib.

Methods: Data for US patients enrolled in two global, Phase 3, randomized, controlled trials of 6 months’ (ORAL Step, NCT00960440) and 24 months’ (ORAL Scan, NCT00847613) duration were reviewed: these two Phase 3 trials were chosen as, for both trials, the patient populations reflected how tofacitinib is mainly prescribed in the US. Tofacitinib was dosed at 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID) in combination with non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (mainly methotrexate) in patients with inadequate responses to ≥1 non-biologic or biologic DMARDs. Patients receiving placebo (in combination with DMARDs) were advanced to tofacitinib at Month 3 (ORAL Step) or by Month 6 (ORAL Scan). Analysis of endpoints for both studies occurred at Month 3, before patients receiving placebo were advanced to tofacitinib. The 17-item RA HCRU Questionnaire (v1.1) assessed the impact of RA across three domains: health care resource use, work-related activities, and daily activities. The composite Work Loss Index assessed work productivity in US patients; work productivity for the entire study population was assessed with the 25-item Work Limitations Questionnaire.

Results: Representative questions from each domain of the HCRU questionnaire are shown (Table). With the exception of doctor office visits, there was generally infrequent use of health care resources by patients receiving tofacitinib (both doses) at Month 3 in both studies, and was comparable to placebo. In ORAL Step and ORAL Scan, patients treated with both tofacitinib doses reported numerically lower impact on daily and work-related activities vs placebo at Month 3. The work productivity results reflect those of the entire study population, where US patients in ORAL Step receiving either tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID reported significant improvements in least squares mean (LSM) changes in work loss index from baseline vs placebo at Month 3: -1.73 (p<0.05) and -2.10 (p<0.01), respectively, vs placebo (1.36). In ORAL Scan, only US patients treated with tofacitinib 10 mg BID had significant improvements in LSM changes from baseline: -2.38 (p<0.05) vs -0.33 for placebo. Overall, the tofacitinib responses reported at Month 3 were maintained up to Month 6 (ORAL Step) and Month 24 (ORAL Scan).

Conclusion: At Month 3, US patients receiving tofacitinib in these two Phase 3 studies reported similar use of health care resources as placebo. At Month 3, patients receiving tofacitinib reported numerically less impact of RA on daily and work-related activities compared with patients receiving placebo.

 


Table. Health care resource utilization in US patients with RA treated with tofacitinib during participation in two Phase 3 studies
    ORAL Step† ORAL Scan‡
  Tofacitinib
5 mg
BID

Tofacitinib
10 mg
BID

Placebo

Tofacitinib
5 mg
BID

Tofacitinib
10 mg
BID

Placebo

Health care resource use, % YES (total number of RA-related visits) N=52* N=61* N=53* N=56* N=54* N=23*
Doctor Office visit Month 3 72 (35) 81 (82) 83 (44) 52 (22) 56 (17) 70 (11)
Month 6 71 (45) 84 (74) NA 71 (22) 75 (24) NA
  Month 24 NA NA NA 84 (26) 73 (29) NA
Hospitalizations

Month 3

2 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 2 (0) 2 (0) 0 (0)
 

Month 6

6 (0) 5 (1) NA 0 (0) 2 (0) NA
 

Month 24

NA NA NA 8 (0) 6 (1) NA
Outpatient surgeries or procedures

Month 3

13 (2) 4 (1) 7 (1) 4 (0) 4 (1) 0 (0)
 

Month 6

2 (0) 2 (0) NA 9 (0) 2 (0) NA
 

Month 24

NA NA NA 10 (3) 12 (0) NA
Use of assistive devices or aids for daily functioning

Month 3

20 11 26 17 26 15
 

Month 6

22 10 NA 22 21 NA
 

Month 24

NA NA NA 18 18 NA
Work-related, % YES (duration reported as mean number of days) N=39* N=51* N=41* N=46* N=51* N=21*
Absent or on sick leave

Month 3

8 (31.7) 11 (2.8) 16 (2.6) 11 (23.8) 6 (2.3) 11 (2.0)
 

Month 6

8 (36.3) 7 (3.0) NA 6 (4.0) 4 (3.5) NA
 

Month 24

NA NA NA 13 (5.8) 9 (17.0) NA
Part-time instead of full-time work

Month 3

5 (12.0) 6 (6.0) 7 (2.7) 5 (25.0) 6 (2.3) 16 (31.7)
 

Month 6

5 (2.5) 4 (12.0) NA 3 (3.0) 7 (8.7) NA
 

Month 24

NA NA NA 8 (21.0) 7 (32.0) NA
Daily activities, % YES (duration reported as mean number of days) N=52* N=59* N=53* N=55* N=53* N=23*
Unable to complete household duties

Month 3

44 (32.2) 39 (16.6) 62 (24.2) 48 (20.3) 33 (10.5) 50 (9.9)
 

Month 6

41 (22.4) 33 (18.2) NA 39 (18.8) 31 (30.5) NA
 

Month 24

NA NA NA 39 (30.4) 39 (19.8) NA
*Reflects the number of all responses at baseline: this changed with time.
†After Month 3, patients on placebo in ORAL Step advanced to either tofacitinib 5 mg BID or tofacitinib 10 mg BID. ‡After Month 3, some patients on placebo in ORAL Scan advanced to either tofacitinib 5 mg BID or tofacitinib 10 mg BID; all patients advanced after Month 6.
BID, twice daily; N, number of all responses; NA, not applicable; RA, rheumatoid arthritis

 


Disclosure:

V. Strand,

AbbVie, Afferent, Amgen, Biogen Idec, Bioventus, BMS, Carbylan, Celgene, Celltrion, CORRONA, Crescendo, Genentech/Roche, GSK, Hospira, Iroko, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Regeneron, Sanofi, SKK, Takeda, UCB, Vertex,

5;

R. Riese,

Pfizer Inc,

1,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

R. Gerber,

Pfizer Inc,

1,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

D. Gruben,

Pfizer Inc,

1,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

A. G. Bushmakin,

Pfizer Inc,

1,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

E. Y. Mahgoub,

Pfizer Inc,

1,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

G. Wallenstein,

Pfizer Inc,

1,

Pfizer Inc,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effects-of-tofacitinib-on-health-care-resource-utilization-and-work-productivity-in-us-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology