ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2079

Effectiveness of Renoprotective Approaches in Lupus Nephritis: More Than Just Immunosuppression

Maite Castro1, Eduardo Ferreira Borba1, Michelle Lopes1, Sandra G. Pasoto2, Eloisa Bonfá1 and Luciana Seguro2, 1Rheumatology, Hospital das Clinicas, Faculdade de Medicina, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 2Rheumatology Division, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: hypertension, lupus nephritis and proteinuria

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: ARHP II: Lupus

Session Type: ARHP Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose:

Hypertension and persistent proteinuria are risk factors for renal disease progression and are associated with high salt intake, poor adherence to medication and smoking. In systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), proteinuria levels <0.8 g/day at 12 months is predictor of better long-term renal outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a multidisciplinary tight control renoprotective protocol (TCRP) in SLE patients with persistent proteinuria. 

Methods:

All SLE patients (ACR criteria) followed at Lupus Outpatient Clinic were evaluated between September 2014 and May 2015. Twelve patients with persistent stable proteinuria >1g/24h (any time after 6-month induction and on regular maintenance therapy) were included in the TCRP (with a target of proteinuria <1g/24h and BP <130/80). The protocol consisted of visits every 2 weeks to assess: 1. Blood pressure (BP) control; 2. adherence to therapy; 3. dietary modifications.  No change in immunosuppressive drugs was allowed during the study period and glucocorticoid dose was lowered as indicated. Clinical, laboratory and treatment evaluation performed at baseline (T0) and after 3 months (T3) included: SLEDAI,  24h proteinuria, serum levels of creatinine, albumin, potassium, complement C3/C4, anti-dsDNA antibodies, change in glucocorticoid dose, renin angiotensin blockage intake. 

Results:

Patients had mean age of 38.17 ± 7.85 years and disease duration of 9.75 ± 7.14 years. At nephritis presentation, three (25%) patients had creatinine >1mg/dL, 9 (75%) had positive anti-dsDNA and 8 (67%) had biopsy (5 membranous and 3 proliferative). Induction therapy consisted of mycophenolate (58%) and cyclophosphamide (42%), and maintenance therapy of mycophelonate (92%) and azathioprine (8%). The majority (75%) were under hydroxychloroquine. Renin angiotensin blockage was indicated in all patients as antiproteinuric and/or for BP control. At study entry (T0), 50% had BP > 130/80 mmHg. At least one dose optimization of these regimens and alternative agents were required in all patients during visits. At T3, 10 (83%) patients were using an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, 7 (58%) an angiotensin receptor blocker and 5 (42%) of these patients were under combined therapy. Stable BP target was achieved by 10 (83%) patients at T3 with a significant reduction in diastolic BP (p=0.029). Of note, 24h proteinuria (2.06 ± 0.75 vs 0.94 ± 0.51 g/24h, p<0.001) reduced significantly, with a mean decline of 47.1 ± 19.2%. All patients had a decline in 24h proteinuria values and more than half (58%) of patients achieved proteinuria < 1g/24h at T3. Serum levels of creatinine (0.76 ± 0.18 vs 0.76 ± 0.18 mg/dL), albumin (3.94 ± 0.36 vs 3.99 ± 0.28 g/dL) as well as potassium, complement C3 and C4, frequency of anti-dsDNA and mean SLEDAI scores were similar at T0 and T3 (p>0.05). At T3, a decrease in mean prednisone dose was observed (10.63 ± 6.93 vs 5.83 ± 5.03 mg/day, p=0.077).

Conclusion:

This study suggests that a multidisciplinary tight control renoprotective protocol has a remarkable impact in reducing persistent proteinuria providing a brief window of opportunity for achieving the best predictor of long-term outcome in lupus nephritis.


Disclosure: M. Castro, None; E. F. Borba, None; M. Lopes, None; S. G. Pasoto, None; E. Bonfá, None, 2; L. Seguro, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Castro M, Borba EF, Lopes M, Pasoto SG, Bonfá E, Seguro L. Effectiveness of Renoprotective Approaches in Lupus Nephritis: More Than Just Immunosuppression [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effectiveness-of-renoprotective-approaches-in-lupus-nephritis-more-than-just-immunosuppression/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effectiveness-of-renoprotective-approaches-in-lupus-nephritis-more-than-just-immunosuppression/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology