ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 484

Effectiveness of Platelet-derived Microparticles for the Diagnosis and Clinical Evaluation of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Hideyuki Horikoshi1, Ko Takamatsu 1, Rika Suzuki 1, Yasuyoshi Kusanagi 1, Fumihiko Kimura 1 and Kenji Itoh 1, 1National Defense Medical College Division of Hematology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and microparticles

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: RA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster I: Risk Factors, Predictors, & Prognosis

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Platelet-derived microparticles (PDMP) are membrane vesicles released from activated platelets and contain various inflammatory or angiogenetic factors; therefore, PDMP may be a new biomarker for the diagnosis of rheumatic disease. Previous studies regarding PDMP levels in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have compared patients with osteoarthritis or less active RA but not those with undifferentiated arthritis (UA), which requires more differentiation from RA. Moreover, reports on the clinical characteristics of RA patients with high PDMP levels are limited. We conducted the analysis of plasma PDMP levels obtained from 65 patients, including those with RA and UA. Furthermore, we examined the clinical features of RA cases with high PDMP levels.

Methods: In total, plasma PDMP levels in 65 cases (RA, n = 28; polymyalgia rheumatica [PMR], n = 11; UA, n = 6; others, n = 20; and healthy controls, n = 7) were analyzed using PDMP ELISA kit employing anti-GPIX and anti-GPIb monoclonal antibodies (Protein Purify Ltd., Gunma, Japan). In addition, we compared PDMP levels with clinical characteristics and other biomarkers, including C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP3), rheumatoid factor (RF), and anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP).

Results: Mean PDMP levels (± SD) for each disease group and controls were as follows: RA, 51.96 ± 42.87 U/ml; PMR, 26.10 ± 36.92 U/ml; UA, 5.27 ± 4.13 U/ml; others, 23.28 ± 26.93 U/ml; healthy controls, 6.20 ± 3.13 U/ml. Plasma PDMP levels were significantly higher in RA patients than in UA patients and control. Furthermore, in RA patients, PDMP levels positively correlated with RF (r = 0.6541; p = 0.0002) and anti-CCP (r = 0.5944; p = 0.0009). Notably, PDMP levels negatively correlated with MMP3 (r = −0.5489; p = 0.0025); MMP3 levels between RA and UA patients were not significant. In addition, compared with 22 RA patients without interstitial pneumonia, 6 RA patients complicated with interstitial pneumonia showed elevated PDMP levels (85.72 ± 26.60 U/ml vs. 42.76 ± 42.19 U/ml; p = 0.0281).

Conclusion: Plasma PDMP levels are useful in the differential diagnosis of RA and UA. Plasma PDMP levels were correlated with RA-associated autoantibody and the complication of interstitial pneumonia, moreover, negatively correlated with MMP3; therefore, plasma PDMP can be a candidate for an independent biomarker for the diagnosis and clinical evaluation of RA.

Figure 1. PDMP levels in each disease group.
RA, rheumatoid arthritis; PMR, polymyalgia rheumatica; UA, undifferentiated arthritis;
Other includes rheumatic diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus and dermatomyositis.

Figure 2. Correlation of PDMP levels with RF -A- and anti-CCP titers -B- PDMP levels positively correlated with RF and anti-CCP. RF, rheumatoid factor; anti-CCP, anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibody.

Figure 3. -A- MMP3 level for each disease group. MMP3 level between RA and UA was not significant. -B- PDMP levels negatively correlated with MMP3. RA, rheumatoid arthritis; PMR, polymyalgia rheumatica; UA, undifferentiated arthritis; Other includes rheumatic diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus and dermatomyositis; MMP3, matrix metalloproteinase-3


Disclosure: H. Horikoshi, None; K. Takamatsu, None; R. Suzuki, None; Y. Kusanagi, None; F. Kimura, None; K. Itoh, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Horikoshi H, Takamatsu K, Suzuki R, Kusanagi Y, Kimura F, Itoh K. Effectiveness of Platelet-derived Microparticles for the Diagnosis and Clinical Evaluation of Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effectiveness-of-platelet-derived-microparticles-for-the-diagnosis-and-clinical-evaluation-of-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effectiveness-of-platelet-derived-microparticles-for-the-diagnosis-and-clinical-evaluation-of-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology