ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0775

Effectiveness of Dose Reduction and Withdrawal Strategies of TNF Inhibitors in Psoriatic Arthritis and Axial Spondyloarthritis: Long Term Extension of the DRESS-PS Study

Amy Peeters, C.A.J Michielsens, Elien Mahler, Lise Verhoef, Alfons den Broeder, Nathan den Broeder and Noortje van Herwaarden, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), Anti-TNF Drugs, Biologicals, clinical trial, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 12, 2023

Title: Abstracts: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment I: PsA

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:00PM-3:30PM

Background/Purpose: Tumor Necrosis Factor inhibitors (TNFi) are effective in PsA and axial SpA, but are associated with increased infections risk, patient burden and high costs. The DRESS-PS study1 was the first study to show that a Treat-To-Target (T2T) tapering strategy in PsA and axSpA patients is non-inferior compared to T2T without tapering regarding Low Disease Activity (LDA) status at 12 months, with a considerable reduction of TNFi use. If these effects can be maintained up to 2 years is unknown.

The aim of this study was to describe effectiveness of disease activity guided dose optimization of TNFi up to 24 months follow-up in patients with PsA and axSpA who participated in the DRESS-PS study.

Methods: This study is a 12-month observational extension of the DRESS-PS study. In the DRESS-PS study, patients were allocated to protocolized T2T tapering (intervention) or to T2T without tapering (control). During the extended follow-up, treatment decisions were according to usual care and T2T tapering was allowed for all patients. Patients visited the outpatient clinic bi-annually.

Primary outcomes were disease activity (presented as proportion in LDA and mean disease activity), and TNFi use (presented as percentage of the current daily dose to the defined daily dose (DDD)). Secondarily, functioning measured with HAQ-DI and BASFI and quality of life measured with EQ5D, SF12 and ASAS-HI at 24 months are reported.

We also compared effects of protocolized tapering to routine care tapering, by comparing the intervention group at 12 months to the control group at 24 months.

Results: 114 patients (of 122) were included in the extension study (table 1). The proportion in LDA state at 24 months was 67% (45 of 67) in patients originally allocated in the intervention group and 72% (23 of 32) in patients originally allocated in the control group (difference 4.7% (95%CI: -15% to 24%)). Mean disease activity remained stable during the extension period (Figure 1A and 1B).

101/114 (89%) patients attempted tapering during follow up (100% intervention vs 63% control). TNFi %DDD at 24 months was 66% (95%CI: 57% to 75%) in the original intervention group and 77%% (95%CI: 68% to 87%) in the original control group (Figure 1C and D). Functioning and quality of life at 24 months was similar between patients originally randomized to intervention and control (table 2).

The comparison between protocolized tapering and routine care tapering showed no difference in patients in LDA state 12 months after start of tapering: 70% vs 72%% (difference 2.3% (95%CI: -16% to 21%)). However, there was a significant difference in TNFi use: %DDD 52% in the intervention group at 12 months and 77% in the control group at 24 months (difference 26% (95%CI: -13% to 38%)).

Conclusion: T2T tapering of TNFi remains effective and safe regarding disease control up to two years. However, the %DDD seems to increase somewhat in the intervention group, and is higher compared to studies in RA, and tapering in usual care seems less frequent. Whether this is by chance, or caused by a disease-specific need for higher dosing or more subjective disease activity measures, remains a topic for further research.

References
1. Michielsens CA et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 Oct;81(10):1392-1399.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1: Mean disease activity presented as PASDAS in patients with PsA (A) and ASDAS in patients with AxSpA (B) and mean TNFi dose presented as percentage of daily defined dose in patients with PsA (C) and patients with AxSpA (D), between T2T with tapering and T2T without tapering.

Supporting image 2

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients with PsA or axSpA treated with a T2T strategy with tapering attempt (intervention) or a T2T strategy without tapering attempt (control)

Supporting image 3

Table 2. Results of questionnaires on Quality of life and functioning in patients with PsA and axSpA in a T2T tapering strategy (intervention) and T2T strategy without tapering (control) at 24 months


Disclosures: A. Peeters: None; C. Michielsens: None; E. Mahler: Novartis, 6, Pfizer, 6; L. Verhoef: None; A. den Broeder: None; N. den Broeder: None; N. van Herwaarden: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Peeters A, Michielsens C, Mahler E, Verhoef L, den Broeder A, den Broeder N, van Herwaarden N. Effectiveness of Dose Reduction and Withdrawal Strategies of TNF Inhibitors in Psoriatic Arthritis and Axial Spondyloarthritis: Long Term Extension of the DRESS-PS Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effectiveness-of-dose-reduction-and-withdrawal-strategies-of-tnf-inhibitors-in-psoriatic-arthritis-and-axial-spondyloarthritis-long-term-extension-of-the-dress-ps-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effectiveness-of-dose-reduction-and-withdrawal-strategies-of-tnf-inhibitors-in-psoriatic-arthritis-and-axial-spondyloarthritis-long-term-extension-of-the-dress-ps-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology