ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1442

Effectiveness of Cycling JAKi Compared to Switching to bDMARD in Patients Who Failed a First JAKi in an International Collaboration of Registries of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients (the JAK-pot Study)

Manuel Pombo-Suarez1, Carlos Sanchez-Piedra2, Juan J Gomez-Reino3, Kim Lauper4, Nevsun Inanc5, Anja Strangfeld6, Doreen Huschek7, Karel Pavelka8, Eirik Kristianslund9, Tore Kvien10, Ziga Rotar11, Dan Nordström12, Denis Choquette13, Ori Elkayam14, Burkhard Leeb15, Maria José Santos16, Kimme Hyrich17, Lianne Kearsley-Fleet18, Catalin Codreanu19, Denis Monguin20, Delphine Courvoisier20 and Axel Finckh21, 1Rheumatology Service, Hospital Clinico Universitario, Santiago De Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 2Research Unit, Spanish Society of Rheumatology, Madrid, Spain, 3Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 4Geneva University Hospitals, Geneve, Switzerland, 5Division of Rheumatology, Marmara University, School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey, 6Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 7Epidemiology and Health Services Research, German Rheumatism Research Center, Berlin, Germany, Berlin, Germany, 8Institute of Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic, 9Division of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, Oslo, Norway, 10Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 11Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 12Division of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland, 13Institut de Rhumatologie de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada, 14Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel, 15Karl Landsteiner University for Health Sciences, Krems/Donau, Karl Landsteiner Institute for Clinical Rheumatology, Hollabrunn, Austria, 16Rheumatology Department, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal, 17University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, 18Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, 19Center of Rheumatic Diseases, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", Bucharest, Romania, 20Division of Rheumatology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland, 21University Hospital of Geneva, Geneve - Vesenaz, Switzerland

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), registry, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 8, 2021

Title: Abstracts: RA – Treatments II: New Findings in Established Therapies (1442–1445)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:00PM-2:15PM

Background/Purpose: With the arrival of new Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), with different JAK inhibition profiles, there is the possibility of using a second JAKi in the event of failure to a first JAKi in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). There are no data on the effectiveness of cycling JAKi compared to switching to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) in patients who have failed a first JAKi. The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of cycling JAKi vs switching to bDMARD in a real-world RA population.

Methods: Nested cohort study within an international collaboration of RA registries (data contributed from 14 national registries of the JAK-pot collaboration). We pooled prospectively collected data from RA patients who failed a first JAKi and were subsequently treated with either a second JAKi (JAKi cycling) or with a bDMARD (switching) in routine care. We compared the effectiveness of both strategies in terms of drug retention and in terms of disease activity (DAS28) evolution over 1 year after second treatment initiation. Differences in drug survival rates were assessed by Log Rank Test. DAS28 trajectories were predicted based on an age- and gender-adjusted linear mixed model with a quadratic trend over time.

Results: 708 patients who failed JAKi were included. 154 cycled to a second JAKi and 554 switched to a bDMARD (Table 1). Patients cycling JAKi were older, had longer disease duration, had received more bDMARDs and had longer exposure to first JAKi treatment than switchers to a bDMARD. Monotherapy was more prevalent and discontinuation of the first JAKi was more common for safety reasons than for lack of effectiveness. Cycling and switching strategies showed similar drug survival rates after two years of follow-up (Figure 1). Nevertheless, a non-significant trend emerged where discontinuation was more likely among patients cycling JAKi when reason for stopping the first JAKi was an adverse event, whereas discontinuation was less likely among patients cycling JAKi when reason for stopping the first JAKi was ineffectiveness. DAS28 over time evolved in a similar way between patients cycling JAKi and switching to a bDMARD, with improvements after one year of follow-up (Figure 2).

Conclusion: After failing a first JAKi, cycling JAKi versus switching to a bDMARD appears to have similar effectiveness despite a more difficult to treat patient profile for the patients cycling to JAKi.


Disclosures: M. Pombo-Suarez, MSD, 1, SANOFI, 6, Janssen, 6, Lilly, 6; C. Sanchez-Piedra, None; J. Gomez-Reino, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, Biogen, 2, 5, Gilead Sciences, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, MSD, 2, 5, Roche, 2, 5; K. Lauper, Gilead Galapagos, 6, Viatris, 6; N. Inanc, Abbvie, 6, Lilly, 6, MSD, 6, Novartis, 6, Pfizer, 6, Roche, 6, Amgen, 6, Celltrion, 6, UCB, 6; A. Strangfeld, Pfizer, 6, Roche, 6, MSD, 6, BMS, 6, Abbvie, 6, Celltrion, 6; D. Huschek, None; K. Pavelka, Abbvie, 6, UCB, 6, MSD, 6, Roche, 6, Pfizer, 6, Eli Lilly, 6, Egis, 6, Biogen, 6, Pfizer, 6; E. Kristianslund, None; T. Kvien, Biogen, 6, Celltrion, 6, Egis, 6, Eli Lilly, 6, Evapharma, 6, Ewopharma, 6, Gilead, 6, Hikma, 6, Mylan, 6, Oktal, 6, Sandoz, 6, Sanofi, 6, Abbvie, 5, 6, BMS, 5, MSD, 5, Novartis, 5, 6, Pfizer, 5, 6, Amgen, 5, 6, UCB, 5; Z. Rotar, Abbvie, 6, Eli Lilly, 6, MSD, 6, Novartis, 6, Pfizer, 6, Roche, 6, Sandoz, 6, UCB, 6; D. Nordström, Abbvie, 6, BMS, 6, Lilly, 6, MSD, 6, Novartis, 6, Pfizer, 6, Roche, 6, UCB, 6, Celgene, 5; D. Choquette, AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Celltrion, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, Sandoz, 2, 5, Sanofi, 2, 5, Teva Pharmaceuticals, 2, Gilead Sciences, 2; O. Elkayam, NOVARTIS, 1, 2, 6, Pfizer, 1, 2, 5, 6, Lilly, 1, 2, 6, Abbvie, 1, 6, BI, 1, 6; B. Leeb, Abbvie, 2, 6, Lilly, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, Janssen-Cilag, 2, Morphosys, 2, Biogen, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, Sandoz, 6, Roche, 6, Grünenthal, 6, Celgene, 6; M. José Santos, Abbvie, 6, Novartis, 6, Pfizer, 6, Roche, 6; K. Hyrich, Abbvie, 6, Pfizer, 5, BMS, 5; L. Kearsley-Fleet, None; C. Codreanu, AbbVie, 1, 6, Amgen, 1, 6, Ewopharma, 6, Lilly, 6, Novartis, 1, 6, Pfizer, 1, 6; D. Monguin, None; D. Courvoisier, Medtalks Switzerland, 6; A. Finckh, Eli Lilly, 5, 6, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, 6, AbbVie, 2, 5, UCB, 2, Roche, 2, Galapagos, 5, MSD, 2, A2 Biotherapeutics, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Pombo-Suarez M, Sanchez-Piedra C, Gomez-Reino J, Lauper K, Inanc N, Strangfeld A, Huschek D, Pavelka K, Kristianslund E, Kvien T, Rotar Z, Nordström D, Choquette D, Elkayam O, Leeb B, José Santos M, Hyrich K, Kearsley-Fleet L, Codreanu C, Monguin D, Courvoisier D, Finckh A. Effectiveness of Cycling JAKi Compared to Switching to bDMARD in Patients Who Failed a First JAKi in an International Collaboration of Registries of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients (the JAK-pot Study) [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effectiveness-of-cycling-jaki-compared-to-switching-to-bdmard-in-patients-who-failed-a-first-jaki-in-an-international-collaboration-of-registries-of-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-the-jak-pot-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effectiveness-of-cycling-jaki-compared-to-switching-to-bdmard-in-patients-who-failed-a-first-jaki-in-an-international-collaboration-of-registries-of-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-the-jak-pot-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology