ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2895

Effect of Vitamin D on Serum Markers of Bone Turnover in SLE in a Randomized Controlled Trial

Sara K. Tedeschi1, Cynthia Aranow2, Diane L. Kamen3, Meryl S. LeBoff4, Betty Diamond2 and Karen Costenbader5, 1Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 2The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, 3Medicine/Rheumatology & Immunology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 4Division of Endocrinology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 5Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: SLE, Vitamin D and bone turnover markers

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: 5T111 ACR Abstract: SLE–Clinical IV: Clinical Outcomes (2892–2897)

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Bone health in SLE is adversely affected by vitamin D deficiency, inflammatory cytokines including interferon (IFN)-α, and glucocorticoid use. We tested the hypothesis that vitamin D supplementation would increase bone formation and decrease bone resorption in an SLE clinical trial.

Methods: Vitamin D-deficient SLE subjects had completed a randomized controlled trial (NCT00710021) testing the effect of 2000 IU/d or 4000 IU/d vitamin D supplementation vs. placebo for 12 weeks upon the IFN gene signature. For this analysis, low- and high-dose vitamin D groups were analyzed together. All subjects met 1997 ACR SLE Classification Criteria, had inactive disease (SELENA-SLEDAI <=4), and were taking <20 mg of prednisone daily at baseline. Serum 25(OH) vitamin D and bone turnover markers (N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen [P1NP], a marker of bone formation, and C-telopeptide [CTX], a marker of bone resorption), were assayed in baseline and week 12 blood samples. Change in (Δ) P1NP, CTX, and 25(OH)D were calculated as week 12 minus baseline. Spearman rho estimated the correlation between Δ25(OH)D and Δbone turnover markers. We tested the effect of vitamin D supplementation vs. placebo on ΔP1NP and ΔCTX using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests in an intention-to-treat analysis. Subgroup analyses tested the effect of vitamin D among subjects with current glucocorticoid use and with a detectable IFN signature. Secondary analyses excluded bisphosphonate users and tested the effect of achieving vitamin D repletion (>=30 ng/mL).

Results: We analyzed 28 subjects randomized to vitamin D and 15 randomized to placebo. Baseline characteristics including P1NP and CTX were similar between groups. Mean age was 39.0 (SD 11.5) years, 93.0% were female, 48.8% Black, 41.8% White, and 39.5% used glucocorticoids at baseline. IFN signature was present in 83.7% at baseline. Sixty-five percent of subjects in the vitamin D group achieved repletion compared to none in the placebo group. Mean increase in 25(OH)D was 17.7 (SD 8.2) ng/mL in the vitamin D group vs. 2.9 (SD 4.9) ng/mL in the placebo group (p <0.01). Changes in 25(OH)D were not significantly correlated with ΔP1NP or ΔCTX. Changes in bone turnover markers were not significantly different in the vitamin D group vs. placebo group in the primary analysis (Table). The effect of vitamin D vs. placebo did not differ by glucocorticoid use. An increase in P1NP, suggesting bone formation, was observed in subjects without baseline IFN signature assigned to vitamin D, but this was not significantly different from placebo (p 0.16). Results from the primary analysis were similar after excluding bisphosphonate users (n=4). Changes in bone turnover markers were not significantly different in those who did vs. did not achieve vitamin D repletion.

Conclusion: Vitamin D supplementation did not affect the 12-week change in bone turnover markers among SLE subjects in this trial.

 

Table. Effect of vitamin D vs. placebo on 12-week change in bone turnover markers

 

ΔP1NP, ng/mL

p value

ΔCTX, ng/mL

p value

Primary analysis (n=43)

 

 

 

 

Vitamin D (n=28)

-0.2 (-6.2, 4.7)

0.83

0.01 (-0.04, 0.02)

0.50

Placebo (n=15)

-1.1 (-6.8, 13.0)

-0.04 (-0.07, 0.03)

Subgroup analyses

Glucocorticoid use at baseline

Yes (n=17)

 

 

 

 

Vitamin D (n=12)

-0.4 (-5.1, 7.1)

0.96

0.01 (-0.04, 0.02)

0.33

Placebo (n=5)

-1.2 (-6.8, 3.8)

-0.04 (-0.05, -0.01)

No (n=26)

 

 

 

 

Vitamin D (n=16)

0.6 (-8.6, 3.8)

0.74

-0.01 (-0.06, 0.04)

0.90

Placebo (n=10)

0.3 (-4.9, 13.0)

-0.01 (-0.07, 0.05)

Interferon signature at baseline

Present (n=36)

 

 

 

 

Vitamin D (n=25)

-0.5 (-8.3, 2.2)

0.51

0.01 (-0.05, 0.01)

0.22

Placebo (n=11)

-1.2 (-6.8, 13.2)

-0.04 (-0.08, 0.03)

Absent (n=7)

 

 

 

 

Vitamin D (n=3)

15.8 (10.8, 16.1)

0.16

0.03 (-0.04, 0.36)

0.87

Placebo (n=4)

0.3 (-5.0, 7.4)

0.02 (-0.03, 0.49)

Presented as median (25th, 75th)

p values from Wilcoxon rank-sum tests

 


Disclosure: S. K. Tedeschi, None; C. Aranow, GlaxoSmithKline, 5,GlaxoSmithKline, 2,EMD Serrono, 2,Xencor, 2,UCB, Inc., 2,Takeda, 2,Janssen, 2; D. L. Kamen, None; M. S. LeBoff, NIH/NIAMS, 2,Amgen Inc., 1; B. Diamond, None; K. Costenbader, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Tedeschi SK, Aranow C, Kamen DL, LeBoff MS, Diamond B, Costenbader K. Effect of Vitamin D on Serum Markers of Bone Turnover in SLE in a Randomized Controlled Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effect-of-vitamin-d-on-serum-markers-of-bone-turnover-in-sle-in-a-randomized-controlled-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effect-of-vitamin-d-on-serum-markers-of-bone-turnover-in-sle-in-a-randomized-controlled-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology