ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2143

Effect of Upadacitinib and Adalimumab on Residual Pain Among Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Whose Inflammation Was Attenuated After Three and Six Months of Treatment

Louis Bessette1, Georg Pongratz2, Luca Navarini3, Rodrigo Garcia Salinas4, Tianming Gao5, Marie-Claude Laliberté6, Ralph Lippe7 and Philip J Mease8, 1Centre de l'Ostoporose et de Rhumatologie de Québec, Québec, QC, Canada, 2Asklepios Clinic Bad Abbach, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany, 3Rheumatology, Immunology, and Clinical Medicine, Department of Medicine, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy, 4Hospital Italiano de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina, 5AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL, 6AbbVie, Québec, QC, Canada, 7AbbVie, Inc, Wiesbaden, Germany, 8Swedish Medical Center/Providence St. Joseph Health, Seattle, WA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Anti-TNF Drugs, clinical trial, Inflammation, pain, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2022

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including PsA – Treatment Poster III: PsA

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Managing pain, a predominant symptom of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), is a priority for patients and healthcare providers. Upadacitinib (UPA), a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, was effective vs placebo (PBO) in the SELECT-PsA 1 study. The objective of this post-hoc analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of UPA, adalimumab (ADA), and PBO on residual pain in patients with PsA who had attenuation of inflammation.

Methods: The SELECT-PsA 1 study enrolled adults with active PsA with prior inadequate response or intolerance to ≥1 non-biologic DMARD. Randomization arms included UPA 15 mg once daily (QD), ADA 40 mg every other week, and PBO. Subgroup assessment was conducted between patients with attenuation of inflammation vs remaining inflammation at week 12 and week 24. Attenuation of inflammation was defined as swollen joint count based on 66 joints (SJC66) of 0 and CRP levels < 6 mg/L. Mean change from baseline in Patient’s Global Assessment (PGA) of pain at week 12 and week 24 as well as ≥30%, ≥50%, or ≥70% reduction from baseline to week 12 and week 24 in PGA of pain were assessed. For continuous endpoints, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed at week 12 and 24 separately. The ANCOVA models included treatment and current DMARD use (yes/no) as fixed factors, and baseline value as covariate. For binary endpoints, as observed approach was used, and 95% CI for response rate and response rate difference was based on normal approximation. Patients who received rescue therapy after week 16 were excluded from the week 24 analysis.

Results: Attenuation of inflammation at week 24 was reached by 169 (48.1%), 144 (42.0%), and 66 (24.5%) patients receiving UPA, ADA, and PBO, respectively. Some differences in baseline characteristics were observed between treatment groups in the attenuation of inflammation group, especially in CRP levels (Table 1). Among these patients, mean (95% CI) PGA of pain improved more for UPA (–3.8 [–4.2, –3.5]) and ADA (–3.6 [–3.9, –3.2]) vs PBO (–2.8 [–3.3, –2.3]) at week 24 (Figure 1A). Absolute mean values for PGA dropped from 6.2 at baseline to 2.2 at week 24 with UPA (Figure 1B). For ≥30%, ≥50%, or ≥70% reduction in PGA of pain from baseline, response rates with UPA and ADA were higher than PBO at weeks 12 and 24 (Figure 2). Among patients with remaining inflammation, a similar trend was observed across endpoints at weeks 12 and 24.

Conclusion: After 24 weeks, nearly half of the patients treated with UPA had attenuation of inflammation. In these patients, mean PGA of pain dropped from 6.2 at baseline to 2.2 at week 24, close to the ≤2.0 threshold representing when satisfaction with health is not negatively affected by pain.1,2 Both UPA and ADA showed a higher response rate vs PBO. These results suggest that both UPA and ADA are effective in reducing residual pain in PsA patients over 6 months.

References
1. Wolfe F and Michaud K. J Rheumatol. 2007;34(8):1674-83.
2. Wells GA, et al. J Rheumatol. 2005;32(10):2016-24.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: L. Bessette, AbbVie/Abbott, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Genzyme, UCB, Gilead, Merck/MSD, Organon, Roche; G. Pongratz, Lilly, Sanofi, Boehringer, AbbVie, Galapagos; L. Navarini, BMS, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, MSD, Celegne, AbbVie, Pfizer, Italfarmaco, Roche, Eli Lilly, Sanofi-Genzyme, UCB, Philogen, SOBI, Galapagos; R. Garcia Salinas, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), Genentech, BMS, Merck, UCB, Pfizer; T. Gao, AbbVie; M. Laliberté, AbbVie Inc.; R. Lippe, AbbVie; P. Mease, AbbVie, Amgen, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, UCB, Sun Pharma, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), Celgene, Genentech.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Bessette L, Pongratz G, Navarini L, Garcia Salinas R, Gao T, Laliberté M, Lippe R, Mease P. Effect of Upadacitinib and Adalimumab on Residual Pain Among Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Whose Inflammation Was Attenuated After Three and Six Months of Treatment [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effect-of-upadacitinib-and-adalimumab-on-residual-pain-among-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-whose-inflammation-was-attenuated-after-three-and-six-months-of-treatment/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effect-of-upadacitinib-and-adalimumab-on-residual-pain-among-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-whose-inflammation-was-attenuated-after-three-and-six-months-of-treatment/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology