ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1548

Effect Of TNF Inhibitors On Bone Mineral Density In Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis- a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Nisha Nigil Haroon1, Jeevitha Srighanthan2, Nayef AL Ghanim3, Robert D. Inman4,5,6,7,8,9 and Angela Cheung10, 1Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Osteoporosis Program, University of Toronto, Ontario, ON, Canada, 3Rheumatology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 5Rheumatology, Toronto Western Research Institute. University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 7Dept of Medicine/Rheumatology, Toronto Western Research Institute, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 8U of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 9Dept of Medicine/Rheumatology, The Arthritis Program, Toronto Western Hospital and Division of Rheumatology, Toronto Western Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 10Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), anti-TNF therapy, Bone density, spondylarthritis and spondylarthropathy

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis: Clinical Aspects and Treatment: II

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) are susceptible to osteoporosis (OP) and have high fracture risk. Currently, no specific strategies are established to treat OP in these patients. TNF inhibitors are now increasingly used for treating AS. If TNF inhibitors are shown to prevent or reverse bone loss, use of bisphosphonates can be avoided.  We did a systematic review and meta-analysis to study the effect of TNF inhibitors on spine and hip BMD in patients with AS.

Methods: Two authors searched MEDLINE, EMBASE & Cochrane databases, reviewed abstracts, and extracted data. A third author resolved discrepancies. Eligible studies had at least 70% of subjects satisfying Modified New York AS criteria and a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Case reports and studies on children and adolescents were excluded. The quality of the studies was assessed by Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Primary outcomes (BMD at spine, hip &femoral neck) were analyzed at 1 and 2 years. BMD was expressed as the percent change from baseline. Publication bias was assessed by Funnel plots. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using Q statistic. The overall summary estimate was determined using the random effects model, which was weighted by the inverse variance of the effect size.

Results: Our search was narrowed down to 8 studies (7 observational studies and 1 RCT). BMD data available from 470 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Most subjects were males and their proportion varied from 70-92%. Mean age at enrolment ranged from 36-48 years, and mean disease duration was 9-17 years. Bisphosphonate use was negligible. Little data was available on intake of calcium and vitamin D. The use of TNF inhibitors led to significant improvement in spine and total hip BMD after 1 and 2 years when compared to baseline (Table 1). Femoral neck BMD remained stable at 1 year. The BMD gain was also significant in those treated with TNF inhibitors when compared to controls. In the RCT (TNF inhibitors vs. placebo), the gain in BMD was significantly higher in those treated with TNF inhibitors for 2 years versus those treated with placebo for the first 6 months.

Conclusion: Treatment with TNF inhibitors is associated with improvement in spine and hip BMD in patients with AS. More studies of longer duration and larger sample sizes are needed to better understand the effect of TNF inhibitors on fracture risk.

Table 1: Summary estimates of the effect of TNF inhibitors on BMD in patients with AS

Duration of follow up

(Years)

Lumbar spine

Mean difference, %

(95% CI)

Total hip

Mean difference, %

(95% CI)

Femoral neck

Mean difference, %

(95% CI)

1 year

5.1 (4.0-6.1)

1.8 (1.0-2.5)

0.73 (-0.8-2.2)

2 years

8.6 (6.8-10.3)

2.5 (1.9-3.0)

Insufficient data


Disclosure:

N. Nigil Haroon,

Amgen ,

2;

J. Srighanthan,
None;

N. AL Ghanim,
None;

R. D. Inman,

Amgen,

2;

A. Cheung,

Amgen,

2,

Amgen,

5.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effect-of-tnf-inhibitors-on-bone-mineral-density-in-patients-with-ankylosing-spondylitis-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology