ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1640

Effect of Methotrexate Dose on the Efficacy of Tofacitinib: Treatment Outcomes from a Phase 3 Clinical Trial of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Roy Fleischmann1, Philip J. Mease2, Sergio Schwartzman3, Lie-Ju Hwang4, Aditya Patel5, Koshika Soma4, Carol A. Connell6, Liza Takiya4 and Eustratios Bananis7, 1Rheumatology, Metroplex Clinical Research Center, Dallas, TX, 2Rheumatology Research, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, 3Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 4Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, 5Inventiv Health Inc, South Plainfield, NJ, 6Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, 7Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: DMARDs, methotrexate (MTX), Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), tofacitinib and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). ORAL Scan was a 2-year, randomized, Phase 3, clinical trial that evaluated tofacitinib therapy with background methotrexate (MTX) in patients (pts) with RA and an inadequate response (IR) to MTX.1 In this analysis, the effect of MTX dose on tofacitinib efficacy in pts from ORAL Scan was studied.

Methods: In ORAL Scan, MTX-IR pts with RA were randomized 4:4:1:1 to tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID), tofacitinib 10 mg BID, or placebo with advancement to 5 mg BID or to 10 mg BID at Month 3 or Month 6, in combination with background MTX. MTX dose was stable throughout the study and was categorized as Low (≤12.5 mg/week), Medium (>12.5 to <17.5 mg/week), or High (≥17.5 mg/week). Endpoints evaluated at Month 6 included ACR response rates, proportion of pts achieving low disease activity measured by Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI ≤10), CDAI‑defined remission rate (CDAI ≤2.8), proportion of pts achieving an improvement ≥0.5 in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and least squares mean change from baseline in HAQ-DI, Disease Activity Score (DAS28-4[ESR]), and CDAI. Binary variables were evaluated with non-responder imputation, and continuous variables were analyzed using a longitudinal model. Regression analyses were conducted to evaluate efficacy responses by MTX dose group and other covariates.

Results: 797 pts were randomized and treated (tofacitinib 5 mg BID, n=321; tofacitinib 10 mg BID, n=316; placebo, n=160). 242 pts were included in the Low MTX (9 mg mean) dose group, 333 in the Medium MTX (15 mg mean) dose group, and 222 in the High MTX (21 mg mean) dose group. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were similar across MTX dose groups, though weight, BMI, glucocorticoid (GC) use, and CDAI were higher in the High MTX dose group. At Month 6, greater efficacy was seen with tofacitinib compared to placebo for all endpoints across the 3 MTX dose groups (Table). Efficacy for placebo-treated pts was generally numerically greater in the Medium and High MTX dose groups than in the Low MTX dose group. Efficacy with tofacitinib appeared similar regardless of MTX dose group. Regression analyses demonstrated a lack of effect of BMI, GC use and MTX dose groups on efficacy assessments.

Conclusion: In this post-hoc analysis, clinical efficacy of tofacitinib at Month 6 was greater than placebo, and appeared similar regardless of MTX dose, as in these pts, tofacitinib was added to patients that had an inadequate response to MTX. Higher MTX doses did not appear to result in additional efficacy to tofacitinib than lower doses. A randomized clinical trial is needed in which different doses of MTX are added to tofacitinib in MTX-naïve pts in order to examine the effect of MTX dose on tofacitinib efficacy.

Reference: 1. van der Heijde D et al. Arthritis Rheum 2013; 65: 559-570.

Table: Efficacy responses at Month 6 by MTX dose group and treatment group for patients in ORAL Scan

Low MTX

(≤12.5 mg/week;

category mean = 9 mg/week)

N=242

Medium MTX

(>12.5 to <17.5 mg/week;

category mean = 15 mg/week)

N=333

High MTX

(≥17.5 mg/week;

category mean = 21 mg/week)

N=222

Placebo

N=47

Tofacitinib 5 mg BID

N=102

Tofacitinib 10 mg BID

N=93

Placebo

N=73

Tofacitinib 5 mg BID

N=131

Tofacitinib 10 mg BID

N=129

Placebo

N=40

Tofacitinib 5 mg BID

N=88

Tofacitinib 10 mg BID

N=94

ACR20, %

22.2

54.0*

62.2*

27.5

48.0*

62.4*

25.0

53.6*

60.6*

ACR50, %

6.7

35.0*

44.4*

7.3

31.2*

42.4*

12.5

31.0*

44.7*

ACR70, %

0.0

17.0*

24.4*

2.9

15.2*

21.6*

0.0

10.7*

21.3*

CDAI ≤10, %

8.9

42.0*

52.2*

13.0

32.0*

41.1*

12.5

35.7*

39.4*

CDAI ≤2.8, %

2.2

9.0

13.3*

1.5

8.8*

13.7*

0.0

9.5*

16.0*

HAQ-DI change ≥0.5, %

8.9

32.0*

45.6*

14.5

36.0*

47.6*

7.5

36.1*

50.0*

LS mean CFB in HAQ-DI

-0.01

-0.46*

-0.57*

-0.25

-0.56*

-0.62*

-0.28

-0.45

-0.68*

LS mean CFB in DAS28-4

(ESR)

-1.00

-2.15*

-2.48*

-1.33

-2.28*

-2.39*

-2.07

-2.14

-2.67*

LS mean CFB in CDAI

-13.0

-21.4*

-22.7*

-16.3

-22.6*

-23.3*

-20.12

-23.3

-25.8*

*p<0.05 vs placebo

Data for binary endpoints are full analysis set with non-responder imputation; data for continuous endpoints are full analysis set, longitudinal model. Non-responder imputation was applied to patients who discontinued, and to patients who, at Month 3, had not achieved a 20% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts regardless of treatment assignment.

ACR, American College of Rheumatology response; BID, twice daily; CDAI, Clinical Disease Activity Index; CFB, change from baseline; DAS28, Disease Activity Score; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index; LS, least squares; MTX, methotrexate


Disclosure: R. Fleischmann, Pfizer Inc, 2,Pfizer Inc, 5; P. J. Mease, AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Crescendo, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, UCB and Vertex, 8,AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Crescendo, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, UCB and Vertex, 2; S. Schwartzman, Pfizer Inc, 2,Pfizer Inc, 8; L. J. Hwang, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; A. Patel, None; K. Soma, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; C. A. Connell, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; L. Takiya, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; E. Bananis, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Fleischmann R, Mease PJ, Schwartzman S, Hwang LJ, Patel A, Soma K, Connell CA, Takiya L, Bananis E. Effect of Methotrexate Dose on the Efficacy of Tofacitinib: Treatment Outcomes from a Phase 3 Clinical Trial of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effect-of-methotrexate-dose-on-the-efficacy-of-tofacitinib-treatment-outcomes-from-a-phase-3-clinical-trial-of-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effect-of-methotrexate-dose-on-the-efficacy-of-tofacitinib-treatment-outcomes-from-a-phase-3-clinical-trial-of-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology