ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 250

Early Gout Pain Response at 28 Hours Predicts Response at 5 Days on Both Patient Pain and Physician Global Assessment

Paul M. Peloso1, Ted R. Mikuls2, Brian W. Coburn3, H. Ralph Schumacher Jr.4, Davis F. Gates1, Zoran Popmihajlov1, Walter L. Straus1 and R. Andrew Moore5, 1Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, 2Omaha VA Medical Center and University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 3Omaha VA and University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA, Omaha, NE, 4Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 5University of Oxford, Nuffield Division of Anaesthetics, Oxford, England

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: gout, pain and pain management

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Pain: Basic and Clinical Aspects

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose

This post-hoc analysis from a randomized trial1in acute gout asked whether early pain responses predict subsequent pain and investigator global responses.

Methods

Patient assessment of pain captured at 28 hours (the first measurement after 24 hours of dosing) was considered as the “early onset” timepoint and was compared to the patient’s subsequent pain and investigators global assessment of response to therapy (IGART) at Day 5.  Pain was assessed on a Likert scale (none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3, extreme = 4) and IGART was assessed on a 0–4 point scale (excellent to none). All patients had moderate or greater pain at entry. Early onset of pain relief was defined as “No worse than mild pain” when patients reported pain as “None = 0 or Mild Pain = 1”.  Of the 150 gout patients, all of whom met the 1977 ACR criteria, randomization assigned patients to either etoricoxib 120 mg daily or indomethacin 150 mg daily in a 1:1 ratio. As the analgesic response was similar for etoricoxib and indomethacin in the primary trial, these arms were pooled for this analysis. The 141 patients with complete follow up data were included. Analyses were conducted in SAS® v.9.3.

Results

Ninety percent (90.1%) of patients with mild or no pain at 28 hours continued with mild or no pain at Day 5, vs. 66.7% of those not reaching mild or no pain at 28 hours. More patients with monoarticular than polyarticular gout reached mild or no pain at 28 hours (Breslow-Day, p=0.008).  Monoarticular gout patients with mild or no pain at 28 hours (98.3%) continued to have mild or no pain at Day 5 vs. 70.6% who did not reach mild or no pain at 28 hours (p<0.001). Patients with polyarticular gout reporting mild or no pain at 28 hours continued with mild or no pain at Day 5 (66.7%), vs. 61.5% who attained mild or no pain at 5 Days without reporting mild or no pain at 28 hours (p=NS). Polyarticular gout responded less well early and late vs. monoarticular gout (Table 1`). Mild or no pain at 28 hours correlated with IGART scores of “very good or excellent” at Day 5. Mild or no pain patients at 28 hours had very good or excellent IGART scores at Day 5 (92.6%) vs. 71.7% without mild or no pain at 28 hours (p<0.001). The trend of early pain response with very good/excellent IGART was consistent for monoarticular and polyarticular gout (Breslow-Day p=0.869). Supportive correlations (Pearson’s) for pain and IGART were r=0.498 at 28 hours and r=0.651 at Day 5 (both p <0.0001). 

Table 1. 28-Hour Pain Onset vs Subsequent Pain Response at Day 5

28-Hour Pain Response

Moderate or Greater Pain at Day 5

Mild or No Pain at  Day 5

Percent

Responder

Patient Population

NO

(Mod. or > pain)

20

40

66.7%

All Patients With Gout

YES 

(Mild or no pain)

8

73

90.1%

 

 

CMH Testa

        0.003

 

 

 

Breslow-Day Test

        0.008

 

NO

10

24

70.6%

Monoarticular

Gout

YES

1

59

98.3%

 

 

Chi-Squared Test

       <0.001

 

 

 

Fisher’s Exact Test

       <0.001

 

NO

10

16

61.5%

Polyarticular

Gout

YES

7

14

66.7%

 

 

Chi-Squared Test

        0.716

 

 

 

 Fisher’s Exact Test

        0.768

 

aCMH test controls for monoarticular/polyarticular gout comparison.

 

Conclusion

Early patient pain response of mild or no pain appeared to predict subsequent pain and investigator responses at 5 Days in monoarticular gout. Early response among polyarticular gout patients did not predict subsequent pain response indicating a potentially less stable pain response. This analysis suggests early re-evaluation after 24 hours and modification of gout treatment would benefit patients

1Schumacher HR et al. BMJ. 2002;324:1488–92.


Disclosure:

P. M. Peloso,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

3;

T. R. Mikuls,
None;

B. W. Coburn,
None;

H. R. Schumacher Jr.,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

5;

D. F. Gates,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

3;

Z. Popmihajlov,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

3;

W. L. Straus,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

3;

R. A. Moore,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/early-gout-pain-response-at-28-hours-predicts-response-at-5-days-on-both-patient-pain-and-physician-global-assessment/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology