ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1424

Early Fatigue Improvement with Guselkumab Associates with Longer Term Disease Control in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis Reporting Substantial Fatigue: Post Hoc Analyses of a Sub-Population of a Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Guselkumab in Biologic-Naïve Patients

Dafna Gladman1, Xenofon Baraliakos2, Michael Starr3, Roberto Ranza4, Emmanouil Rampakakis5, Natalie shiff6, Francois Nantel7, Chenglong Han8, Andrew James Knowles Ostor9 and Philip J. Mease10, 1Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Krembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany, 3Division of Rheumatology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada, 4Rheumatology Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil, 5McGill University, Department of Pediatrics / JSS Medical Research, Scientific Affairs, Montreal, QC, Canada, 6Immunology, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC / Adjunct, Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Horsham, PA, 7Nantel Medsci Consult, Consultant, Montreal, QC, Canada, 8Immunology, Janssen Global Services, LLC, Malvern, PA, 9Cabrini Hospital, Monash University & Emeritus Research / Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, 10Swedish Medical Center/Providence St. Joseph Health and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Biologicals, Disease Activity, Fatigue, Patient reported outcomes, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 13, 2023

Title: (1412–1441) Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment Poster II: SpA

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Fatigue is commonly reported by PsA patients (pts) and contributes to disease burden. The fully human IL-23p19-subunit inhibitor guselkumab (GUS) induces clinically meaningful and sustained fatigue improvements through 1y, with GUS exhibiting a substantial direct effect on fatigue, independent of its impact on other clinical outcomes1,2. We previously showed that early fatigue response predicted clinically meaningful improvement (CMI) in fatigue at 2y3. In a sub-population of PsA pts with substantial fatigue at baseline (BL), relationships between early fatigue improvement and disease control at 1y were assessed.

Methods: DISCOVER-2 enrolled bionaïve adults with active PsA (≥5 swollen & ≥5 tender joints, CRP ≥0.6 mg/dl). Pts were randomized (1:1:1) to GUS 100mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); GUS 100mg at W0, W4, Q8W; or placebo (PBO). Pts with BL fatigue below normative levels (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy – Fatigue [FACIT-F] score ≤43)3 were included in the analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses pooling GUS Q4W and Q8W utilized Youden’s index to determine optimal FACIT-F cutoffs at W8 (1st post-BL timepoint assessed) for predicting 1y achievement of ACR50/70, Disease Activity (DA) Index for PsA (DAPSA) ≤14 (in pts with BL DAPSA >14), clinical (c) DAPSA ≤13 (in pts with BL cDAPSA >13), PsA DA Score (PASDAS) ≤3.2 (in pts with BL PASDAS >3.2), HAQ-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) response (improvement ≥0.35 in pts with BL HAQ-DI ≥0.35), HAQ-DI ≤0.5 (in pts with BL HAQ-DI >0.5), and MDA. The association of identified and established FACIT-F cutoffs (≥4-point improvement & score >43) with 1y response was assessed via BL-adjusted logistic regression.

Results: In this sub-population of 448/493 GUS-randomized bionaïve PsA pts with BL FACIT-F score ≤43, the mean (SD) BL FACIT-F level of 28.4 (8.7) indicated severe fatigue. ROC analysis (Figure 1) identified optimal FACIT-F cutoffs at W8 for predicting 1y disease control with GUS ranging from ≥36 (ACR50, DAPSA≤14, cDAPSA≤13, HAQ-DI≤0.5, PASDAS≤3.2) to ≥41 (HAQ-DI response); intermediary cutoffs were identified for remaining endpoints. The FACIT-F ≥37 cutoff was selected for further analyses as the lowest score (highest fatigue) with a significantly higher probability of achievement with GUS vs PBO (32% vs 24%; p=0.0445).

In pts with BL FACIT-F < 37, W8 FACIT-F ≥37 achievement with GUS associated with significantly higher odds of clinical response at 1y (nominal p< 0.05; odds ratio range: 2.3-3.9) (Figure 2). W8 achievement of normative FACIT-F levels or FACIT-F CMI also associated with significantly greater clinical response rates at 1y.

Conclusion: In this sub-population of bionaïve pts with active PsA enriched for high fatigue levels, early achievement of FACIT-F endpoints with GUS associated with higher rates of clinical response and improved/normalized physical function at 1y. Results of this post hoc analysis further underscore the importance of early improvement in patient-reported outcomes such as fatigue on the trajectory of long-term pt outcome.

References:
1. Ritchlin CT. RMD Open. 2022;8;e002195
2. Rahman P. Arthritis Res Ther. 2021;23:190
3. Gladman D. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022;74 (suppl 9)

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2


Disclosures: D. Gladman: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, Celgene, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Galapagos, 2, Gilead Sciences, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5; X. Baraliakos: AbbVie, 2, 6, BMS, 2, 6, Chugai, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Galapagos, 2, 6, Gilead, 2, 6, MSD, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, Pfizer Inc, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 6; M. Starr: AbbVie, 1, 6, Eli Lilly, 1, 6, Janssen, 1, 6, Novartis, 1, 6, Pfizer, 1, 6, UCB, 1, 6; R. Ranza: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 6; E. Rampakakis: Janssen, 2, JSS Medical Research, Inc, 3; N. shiff: AbbVie, 11, Gilead, 11, Iovance, 11, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 11, Novo-Nordisc, 11, Pfizer, 11; F. Nantel: Janssen, 2, Johnson & Johnson, 11; C. Han: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 11; A. Ostor: AbbVie/Abbott, 1, 2, 12, Undertaken clinical trials, Eli Lilly, 1, 2, 12, Undertaken clinical trials, Janssen, 1, 2, 12, Undertaken clinical trials, Novartis, 1, 2, 12, Undertaken clinical trials, Pfizer, 1, 2, 12, Undertaken clinical trials; P. Mease: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Acelyrin, 2, Aclaris, 2, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Galapagos, 2, Gilead, 2, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, Inmagene, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, MoonLake Pharma, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Sun Pharma, 2, 5, UCB Pharma, 2, 5, 6, Ventyx, 2, Xinthera, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gladman D, Baraliakos X, Starr M, Ranza R, Rampakakis E, shiff N, Nantel F, Han C, Ostor A, Mease P. Early Fatigue Improvement with Guselkumab Associates with Longer Term Disease Control in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis Reporting Substantial Fatigue: Post Hoc Analyses of a Sub-Population of a Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Guselkumab in Biologic-Naïve Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/early-fatigue-improvement-with-guselkumab-associates-with-longer-term-disease-control-in-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis-reporting-substantial-fatigue-post-hoc-analyses-of-a-sub-population-o/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/early-fatigue-improvement-with-guselkumab-associates-with-longer-term-disease-control-in-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis-reporting-substantial-fatigue-post-hoc-analyses-of-a-sub-population-o/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology