ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2380

Durability of First Biologic Is Not Influenced By Initial/Early DAS28

Gina Rohekar1, Binu Jacob2, Janet E. Pope3 and Claire Bombardier4, 1Rheumatology, St. Joseph's Hospital, London, ON, Canada, 2University Health Network, Toronto General Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada, 4Rheumatology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologic drugs, Clinical practice, drug treatment, epidemiologic methods and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects (ACR): Impact of Various Interventions and Therapeutic Approaches

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:  

The Ontario Best Practices Research Initiative (OBRI) collects data on RA treatment in a real-world setting.  Patients are enrolled and prospectively followed to assess response to biologic and DMARD therapy as well as to collect data on other factors.  The objective of this study is to look at a real-world population and determine if initial disease activity influences the durability of the first used biologic in RA treatment.

Methods:

Biologic-naïve RA patients were included if they started a biologic at baseline or at any time after entry into OBRI.  For initial DAS, we used the DAS28 value when it was measured between 6 months before and 3 months after the start of the first biologic, whichever was closer to the date of biologic use.  This was done so as the initial DAS28 would best reflect the patient’s DAS at start of biologic.  Patients were censored at treatment stop date or discontinuation date, date of death, or up to 18 months after initiation of biologic, whichever occurred first. Persistence was defined as the length of time the patients continued to receive the drug, irrespective of change in dose, route, or addition of any other DMARD, steroids, etc.  If the drug was stopped for <60 days after which the patient restarted the same medication, it was considered a continuation and the duration was calculated accordingly. Survival was first compared using KM curves and then again using Cox-regression analysis.  Analysis was performed for all years and also censored at 1.5 years.

Results:

471 patients were included. At 1 year, the survival probability was 0.76 (95% CI 0.68-0.81).  Median survival was 5.005 years (95% CI 3.466-8.337).  Patients who were on biologic monotherapy, with no concomitant DMARD use, has worse persistence of their initial biologic.

Patients were divided into three groups for analysis based on initial DAS28 score:  remission (≤ 2.60), medium to high DAS28 (2.61-5.10) and severe (>5.10).  Figure 1 shows the KM Plot of survival on biologic stratified by DAS28.

Figure 1:

Despite the initial trend towards better survival associated with lower initial DAS, this was not statistically significant.  Similarly, type of insurance (public/private) did not impact survival.  As seen in other studies, the only significant factor to impact survival on initial biologic was use of DMARD with the biologic.

Conclusion:

Early/initial DAS28 score did not impact persistence on their initial biologic, nor did insurance type.  This suggests that initial DAS28 score does not influence the durability of the initial biologic Combination of DMARD and biologic was more durable than biologic monotherapy.


Disclosure:

G. Rohekar,
None;

B. Jacob,
None;

J. E. Pope,
None;

C. Bombardier,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/durability-of-first-biologic-is-not-influenced-by-initialearly-das28/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology