ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1481

Duffy Antigen Screening in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients with Neutropenia: A Quality Improvement Initiative

Divya Sudireddy1, Jason Yang2, Huseyin Berk Degirmenci3, Eva Petrow2 and Michael York4, 1Boston Medical Center, Westborough, MA, 2Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, 3Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA, 4Boston University, Boston, MA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: quality of care, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (1467–1516) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Laboratory monitoring for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is essential for assessing disease activity and detecting treatment-related adverse effects, including cytopenias. Neutropenia in particular may result from immunosuppressive medications. In patients with chronic neutropenia, providers may discontinue immunosuppressive medications out of concern for drug-induced myelosuppression. However, individuals with Duffy null (Fy[a–b–]) red blood cell phenotype, more common among those of African ancestry, have lower baseline absolute neutrophil counts without increased infection risk. The neutropenia associated with Duffy null phenotype may be misattributed to medication-related toxicity leading to inappropriate discontinuation of effective immunosuppressive therapy. We aimed to assess the frequency of Duffy antigen screening in SLE patients with neutropenia at an urban safety-net hospital and implemented a quality improvement (QI) intervention to increase screening.

Methods: We used Epic’s electronic health record (EHR) Slicer Dicer tool to identify patients with SLE and concurrent neutropenia at a single safety net hospital and reviewed the medical records to confirm presence of chronic neutropenia. We conducted an educational session for rheumatologists on the clinical relevance of the Duffy null phenotype and facilitated coordinated ordering of the test. We assessed whether a Duffy antigen screen had been performed and documented the results prior to and 2-months following the intervention.

Results: We identified 78 patients with SLE and leukopenia within the prior year, of whom 62 had neutropenia confirmed by medical record review. Prior to the intervention, 6 patients (9.7%) had undergone Duffy antigen testing, 5 of whom were Duffy null. Following the intervention, an additional 9 patients were screened over a 2-month period, increasing the post-intervention screening frequency to 14.5% (9/62). Among the 9 patients screened post-intervention, 7 had the Duffy null phenotype. Overall, 11 of the 12 patients identified as Duffy null were African American. (Table 1)

Conclusion: Our QI initiative led to a 4.8% absolute increase in Duffy antigen screening frequency in a 2-month post-intervention period. However, overall screening remained suboptimal. Given the higher prevalence of Duffy null phenotype in patients of African ancestry, which constitute a large percentage of SLE patients, recognizing this phenotype is important to prevent unnecessary medication changes that could compromise disease management. Future efforts to be considered include integrating electronic decision support tools, such as a Best Practice Advisory (BPA), to promote routine screening in SLE patients with chronic neutropenia. Our goal is to implement a more streamlined and automated process to ensure Duffy null antigen testing is routinely conducted.

Supporting image 1Table 1: Duffy Antigen Screening Outcomes in SLE Patients with Neutropenia


Disclosures: D. Sudireddy: None; J. Yang: None; H. Degirmenci: None; E. Petrow: None; M. York: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Sudireddy D, Yang J, Degirmenci H, Petrow E, York M. Duffy Antigen Screening in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients with Neutropenia: A Quality Improvement Initiative [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/duffy-antigen-screening-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-patients-with-neutropenia-a-quality-improvement-initiative/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/duffy-antigen-screening-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-patients-with-neutropenia-a-quality-improvement-initiative/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology