ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 212

Dual-Energy Computed Tomography for Monitoring of Urate Deposition in Tophaceous Gout: A Prospective Longitudinal Study Examining Sensitivity to Change

Ashwin Rajan1, Opetaia Aati2, Ramanamma Kalluru3, Gregory Gamble2, Anne Horne2, Anthony Doyle1, Fiona M. McQueen4 and Nicola Dalbeth5, 1University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, 2Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, 3Department of Rheumatology, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand, 4Molecular Medicine and Pathology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, 5Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Computed tomography (CT), gout, imaging techniques and uric acid

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases I: Imaging in Gout, Pediatric, Soft and Connective Tissue Diseases

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) is an advanced imaging method with potential for monitoring urate deposition in patients with gout.  The aim of this prospective longitudinal study was to analyse the sensitivity to change of DECT urate volume measurement.

Methods: Seventy-three patients with tophaceous gout attended study visits at baseline and 12 months. All patients had a comprehensive clinical assessment including serum urate (SU) testing and DECT scanning of both feet at both visits.  Two readers analysed the DECT scans for the total urate volume in both feet.  Paired scans were read in chronological order.  The readers were blinded to each other’s measurements and all clinical measures including serum urate concentrations.  Analysis included inter-reader intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and limits of agreement, and calculation of the smallest detectable change (SDC).

Results: Allopurinol was prescribed in 85% patients during the study period. Mean (SD) SU concentration for both timepoints was 6.3 (1.5) mg/dL.  The median (IQR) baseline DECT urate volume was 0.49 (0.16, 2.18) cm3, and change in DECT urate volume was -0.01 (-0.40, 0.28) cm3.  Inter-reader ICCs were 1.00 for baseline DECT volumes and 0.93 for change values.  Inter-reader bias (SD) for baseline volumes was -0.18 (0.63) cm3 and for change was -0.10 (0.93) cm3.  The SDC was 0.91cm3.  There were 47 (64%) patients with baseline DECT urate volumes <0.91cm3.  Higher mean SU concentrations were observed in patients with increased DECT urate volumes above the SDC (one way ANOVA p=0.006).  However, a relationship between changes in DECT urate volumes and mean SU concentrations was not observed in the entire group (Figure).

Conclusion: DECT urate volume measurement has high inter-reader agreement but low sensitivity to change over one year in patients with tophaceous gout receiving conventional urate-lowering therapy. These data raise questions about the role of DECT as an outcome measure for clinical studies of gout. 

Figure: Scatter plot showing the relationship between change in DECT urate volumes and mean serum urate concentrations (baseline and Year 1).


Disclosure:

A. Rajan,
None;

O. Aati,
None;

R. Kalluru,
None;

G. Gamble,
None;

A. Horne,
None;

A. Doyle,
None;

F. M. McQueen,
None;

N. Dalbeth,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/dual-energy-computed-tomography-for-monitoring-of-urate-deposition-in-tophaceous-gout-a-prospective-longitudinal-study-examining-sensitivity-to-change/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology