ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 11

Drug Prescribing Trends in Adults with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Population-Based Comparative Study from 2005-2014

Alex Zamora-Legoff1, Cynthia S. Crowson2, Eric L. Matteson3, Sara J. Achenbach4 and Elena Myasoedova3, 1Division of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 2Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 3Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 4Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: medication, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and statins

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health - Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  To examine drug prescribing trends for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over recent years and compare them to matched non-RA subjects.

Methods: Retrospective prescription data were examined from 2005-2014 in a population-based cohort of patients with RA and comparable non-RA subjects. Index date was 1/1/2005 for both cohorts. Drugs for or related to the treatment of RA were excluded. Comparisons between cohorts of percentages of patients with at least 1 prescription in a specific drug category/class were performed using Poisson regression models adjusted for age and sex.

Results: A total of 497 patients with RA (71% female) and 527 non-RA comparator subjects (70% female) were included in the study. Median age at index for RA and non-RA subjects was 61 years (range 25-95) and 63 years (range 26-95), respectively. Among the patients with RA, the median duration of RA at index was 7.5 years (range 0 to 24.8). Median time from index to last follow-up for both cohorts was 9.9 years. Comorbidities prior to index were similar among both cohorts with notable exceptions of peptic ulcer disease (13% non-RA vs 19% RA; p=0.006) and peripheral vascular disease (12% non-RA vs 19% RA; p=0.006). Former and/or current smoking was more common among patients with RA (55%) compared to non-RA (46%; p=0.018). The overall observed percentage of subjects who were prescribed at least 1 drug over the ten-year period was somewhat higher among the RA compared to non-RA subjects (relative risk [RR]: 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.99, 1.08). Over the study period, both cohorts demonstrated significant increases in the percentages of patients with at least 1 prescription (7% increase over 10 years in RA, p<0.001; 11% increase in non-RA, p<0.001). Drugs that were more common among RA than non-RA subjects included antimicrobials (50% RA vs 41% non-RA in 2014; RR: 1.24), calcium metabolism modifiers (10% RA vs 6% non-RA in 2014; RR: 1.78), thyroid hormone replacement therapy (23% RA vs 19% non-RA in 2014; RR:1.21), antidepressants (34% RA vs 27% non-RA in 2014; RR: 1.12), antiasthma/inhaled glucocorticoids (RR: 1.21), proton pump inhibitors (28% RA vs 18% non-RA in 2014; RR: 1.45), anti-ulcer (RR: 1.58), contraceptives (5% RA vs 2% non-RA in 2014; RR: 1.69), anti-hypertensives (55% RA vs 49% non-RA in 2014; RR: 1.11) and some others. Prescription drugs that were less common in RA than non-RA were statins (29% RA vs 35% non-RA in 2014; RR: 0.83) and other antilipemic drugs (RR: 0.56). Use of pregabalin/gabapentin (RR: 1:18; 95%CI: 0.98-1.44) and ophthalmic (RR: 1.10; 95%CI: 0.97-1.24) drugs was not statistically different between those with RA and non-RA subjects.

Conclusion:  There was a marked overall increase in prescriptions drugs for both RA and non-RA cohorts over the study period with some prescribing patterns differing between the cohorts. RA patients, at higher risk for cardiovascular events, were consistently prescribed less statins and non-statin antilipemic and were regularly prescribed more proton pump inhibitors than non-RA comparators. The clinical implications of these differences in prescribing patterns require further evaluation.


Disclosure: A. Zamora-Legoff, None; C. S. Crowson, None; E. L. Matteson, None; S. J. Achenbach, None; E. Myasoedova, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Zamora-Legoff A, Crowson CS, Matteson EL, Achenbach SJ, Myasoedova E. Drug Prescribing Trends in Adults with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Population-Based Comparative Study from 2005-2014 [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/drug-prescribing-trends-in-adults-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-population-based-comparative-study-from-2005-2014/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/drug-prescribing-trends-in-adults-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-population-based-comparative-study-from-2005-2014/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology