ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1365

Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 28-Week Trial of Efficacy and Safety of Infliximab Plus Naproxen Vs Naproxen Alone: Results From the Infliximab As First Line Therapy in Patients with Early, Active Axial Spondyloarthritis Trial, Part I

Joachim Sieper1, Jan Lenaerts2, Jürgen Wollenhaupt3, Vadim Mazurov4, L. Myasoutova5, Sung-Hwan Park6, Yeong W. Song7, Ruji Yao8, Denesh Chitkara8 and Nathan Vastesaeger9, 1Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 2Reuma-instituut, Hasselt, Belgium, 3Schön-Klinik, Hamburg, Germany, 4St. Petersburg Medical Academy, St. Petersburg, Russia, 5Kazan State Medical University, Kazan, Russia, 6Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea, 7Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea, 8Merck Sharp and Dohme, Kenilworth, NJ, 9Merck Sharp & Dohme, Brussels, Belgium

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis: Clinical Aspects and Treatment

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Efficacy of anti–tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) has been tested only in patients who are refractory to NSAIDs.

Objectives: To determine whether combination infliximab (IFX)+NSAID therapy is superior to NSAID monotherapy for achieving better clinical outcomes in patients with early, active axial SpA who were naïve to NSAIDs or had a submaximal dose of NSAIDs.

Methods: The INFAST trial was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial of IFX in biologic-naïve patients 18–48 years of age with early, active axial SpA (ASAS criteria, disease duration ≤3 years with chronic back pain and active inflammatory lesions of the sacroiliac [SI] joints on MRI). Patients naïve to NSAIDs or treated with a submaximal dose of NSAIDs were randomized (2:1) to receive 28 weeks of treatment with either IV IFX 5 mg/kg (weeks 0, 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24)+naproxen (NPX) 1000 mg/d or IV placebo (PBO)+NPX 1000 mg/d. The primary endpoint was the percentage of subjects meeting ASAS partial remission criteria at week 28. Treatment group differences were analyzed using Fisher exact tests or analysis of covariance.

Results: 106 patients were randomized to IFX+NPX and 52 to PBO+NPX. At baseline, mean BASDAI scores (100 mm VAS) were 64.4 (SD=15.37) mm and 63.0 (SD=15.43) mm and HLA-B27–positive statuses were 82.1% and 90.4% in the IFX+NPX and PBO+NPX groups, respectively. The primary endpoint, ASAS partial remission at week 28, was achieved by more patients treated with IFX+NPX (61.9%) than PBO+NPX (35.3%), P=0.0021. Partial remission rates increased steadily through weeks 2, 6, 16, and 28 in both the IFX+NPX group (28.6%, 41%, 51.4%, and 61.9%) and the PBO+NPX group (11.8%, 15.7%, 25.5%, 35.3%), with greater partial remission in the IFX+NPX group at each visit (all P <0.05). Improvements in BASDAI, ASDAS, and ESR were considerable and were significantly greater in the IFX+NPX group than the PBO+NPX group (Table 1). The observed CRP decrease was greater in the IFX+NPX group than the PBO+NPX group, but did not reach statistical significance. A greater number of patients in the IFX+NPX group (51.4%) than the PBO+NPX group (19.6%), P=0.0001, achieved inactive disease, defined as ASDAS-CRP <1.3.

Table 1. Change in Efficacy Outcomes from Baseline to Week 28 by Treatment Group

Outcome

IFX+NPX
(N=105)

PBO+NPX
(N=51)

P Value

Baseline, mean

Week 28, mean

Change, mean (SD)

Baseline, mean

Week 28, mean

Change, mean (SD)

BASDAI (100 mm VAS)

64.4

18.0

–46.6
(22.38)

63.0

32.2

–30.2
(24.34)

0.0001

ASDAS

3.8

1.4

–2.4
(1.16)

3.9

2.4

–1.5
(1.13)

<0.0001

ESR (mm/hr)

23.0

7.1

–16.0
(16.11)

28.3

19.0

–9.4
(13.18)

<0.0001

CRP (mg/dL)

2.02

0.91

–1.24
(6.209)

1.65

1.15

–0.55
(1.315)

0.5943

Serious adverse events were reported in 5 (4.8%) patients in the IFX+NPX group (possibly related to study medication in 3 [2.9%] patients) and 3 (5.8%) patients in the PBO+NPX group (possibly related in 2 [3.8%] patients). No deaths occurred.

Conclusion: Patients with early, active axial SpA who were treated with IFX+NPX had greater rates of ASAS partial remission and were more likely to have lower or inactive disease (as measured by BASDAI and ASDAS) than those treated with PBO+NPX. Patients who were treated with PBO+NPX had good response but still had moderately active disease. The safety profile was consistent with that of other anti-TNF biologics.

 


Disclosure:

J. Sieper,

Merck, Abbott, Pfizer,

2,

Merck, Abbott, Pfizer, UCB, Roche, Lilly,

5,

Merck, Abbott, Pfizer,

8;

J. Lenaerts,

Abbott, BMS, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Astra Zeneca,

5;

J. Wollenhaupt,

MSD,

5,

MSD,

8;

V. Mazurov,
None;

L. Myasoutova,
None;

S. H. Park,
None;

Y. W. Song,
None;

R. Yao,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

3;

D. Chitkara,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

3;

N. Vastesaeger,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/double-blind-placebo-controlled-28-week-trial-of-efficacy-and-safety-of-infliximab-plus-naproxen-vs-naproxen-alone-results-from-the-infliximab-as-first-line-therapy-in-patients-with-early-active-a/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology