ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 799

Does Unpredictable Intermittent Knee Pain Limit Functional Ability and Walking Frequency in Knee OA?

Daniel K. White1, Gillian A. Hawker2, David T. Felson3, K. Douglas Gross4, Jingbo Niu5, Michael C. Nevitt6, C.E. Lewis7, James Torner8 and Tuhina Neogi9, 1Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 2Women's College Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Boston University, Boston, MA, 4Physical Therapy, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, 5Clinical Epidemiology Research and Training Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 6Epidemiology & Biostatistics, UCSF (University of California, San Francisco), San Francisco, CA, 7University of Alabama, Birmingham City, AL, 8Epidemiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa City, IA, 9Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Osteoarthritis, Pain and physical activity

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Osteoarthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose: People with knee osteoarthritis (OA) reported that unpredictable pain restricts their ability to engage in physical activities in a qualitative study.  Since walking is the most common physical activity employed by older adults, it would be important to understand if unpredictable pain impacts walking frequency, which would have important health implications. It is also not clear if unpredictable pain contributes to other functional limitations or restrictions in health-related quality of life (HRQOL). We therefore evaluated the association of unpredictable pain with walking frequency, more general function, and physical health related quality of life in people with or at high risk of knee OA.

Methods: The Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST) is a NIH funded longitudinal study of people who have or are at high risk for knee OA.  Participants at the 84-month visit who indicated they had intermittent knee pain were asked to rate the frequency of unpredictable pain, i.e., starts without warning, and the frequency of predictable pain, i.e., starts with a trigger.  Both were rated on a Likert scale (Never to Very Often).  Participants were categorized as having no pain, predominately unpredictable pain, predominantly predictable pain, or both types according to the worst knee.  At the same visit, gait speed over 20 meters, the WOMAC physical function (PF) subscale, and the SF-12 physical function (as a measure of HRQOL) subscale were collected.  Steps/day was also collected using a pedometer (Stepwatch) over the next 7 days.  We calculated study outcomes according to the presence of unpredictable and/or predictable pain, adjusting for age, sex, BMI, comorbidities, frequency of pain, and depressive symptoms using linear regression.

Results: Of data from the 84-month study visit to date, 664 people had intermittent knee pain (Age 68.5 ± 7.6 yrs, BMI 31.3 ± 6.6 kg/m2, female 70%). Predominantly unpredictable pain was reported in 12%; these subjects had significantly more self-reported functional limitation (WOMAC-PF).  However, other outcomes were not statistically significantly different compared with those with no pain.  Subjects with predictable pain and both pain types also had worse WOMAC-PF compared with those with no pain, however all other outcomes had values similar to those with no pain. See Table.

Conclusion: While unpredictable knee pain was associated with more self-reported functional limitation, it was not associated with walking ability and frequency, or HRQOL.  Similar findings were noted for those with predictable pain.  Pain, regardless of its predictability, may not necessarily adversely affect engagement in walking, but does appear to affect self-perceived function.

Table.  Mean and standard error values stratified by pain categories.  Mean values are adjusted for age, sex, BMI, comorbidities, frequency of knee pain and depressive symptoms.  * indicates p<0.01 compared with 'None' Pain type 

Pain type

N (%)

Outcome

Mean

Standard Error

None (i.e., never or seldom predictable

40 (6)

Steps/day

6765.4

484.2

and/or unpredictable pain)

Gait speed (m/s)

1.17

0.02

WOMAC PF

13.9

1.5

SF-12

42.3

1.5

Predominantly Unpredictable Pain

80 (12)

Steps/day

7339.2

383.6

Gait speed (m/s)

1.15

0.02

WOMAC PF*

15.7

1.1

SF-12

42.2

1.1

Predominantly Predictable Pain

375 (56)

Steps/day

7353.1

185.0

Gait speed (m/s)

1.17

0.01

WOMAC PF*

18.4

0.6

SF-12

40.8

0.6

Both Unpredictable and predictable pain

169 (25)

Steps/day

7036.1

278.1

Gait speed (m/s)

1.15

0.02

WOMAC PF*

21.1

0.8

SF-12

40.5

0.8


Disclosure:

D. K. White,
None;

G. A. Hawker,
None;

D. T. Felson,
None;

K. D. Gross,
None;

J. Niu,
None;

M. C. Nevitt,
None;

C. E. Lewis,
None;

J. Torner,
None;

T. Neogi,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/does-unpredictable-intermittent-knee-pain-limit-functional-ability-and-walking-frequency-in-knee-oa/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology