ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1722

Does Starting Allopurinol Prolong Acute Treated Gout?

Erica Hill1, Jay B. Higgs2, Karen Sky3, Michelle Sit4 and Angelique N. Collamer5, 1Rheumatology, San Antonio Military Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, 2Rheumatology, San Antonio Military Medical Center, JBSA - Fort Sam Houston, TX, 3Rheumatology, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Alaska VA Healthcare System, Anchorage, AK, 4Subspecialty Clinic - Rheumatology, David Grant Medical Center, Travis AFB, CA, 5Internal Medicine, Langley AFB Hospital, Langley AFB, VA

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Crystal-induced arthritis, Gout and uric acid

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies II

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:   Gout is a common cause of morbidity in the US population.  Traditionally, allopurinol is not initiated during an acute episode to avoid prolonging the painful gouty attack.  The 2012 ACR guidelines for management of gout suggested that urate-lowering therapy could be started during an acute gout attack, provided that effective acute management was instituted.  These recommendations were based on “consensus opinion of experts, case studies, or standard of care.”  We conducted a 28-day, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of allopurinol initiation in patients receiving treatment for acute gout.   

Methods:   Pre-study power analysis suggested 32 subjects to detect a two-day difference in days to resolution (DTR) of acute gout with a power level of 0.8.  Exclusion criteria included GFR < 50cc/min, AST/ALT or alkaline phosphatase  > 1.25 times normal.  The treating physician determined therapy for the acute gout attack.  Standard prophylaxis, with colchicine or NSAIDs, was prescribed.  Patients were assessed at five visits over 28 days.   The primary endpoint was DTR of acute gout, using separate Likert scales for patient rated involved joint pain and physician exam.  Secondary measures included MHAQ, physician global assessment, side effects of therapy, per protocol (completer) analysis, serum uric acid, CBC, and CMP at two and four weeks.  The intent to treat analysis included any patient who took at least one pill; we assigned 28 days DTR to allopurinol dropouts and actual DTR or last study day to placebo. 

Results:   Thirty-six patients were randomized to 19 placebo and 17 allopurinol. One allopurinol patient dropped out before taking one pill, and was excluded from analysis. Three placebo and two allopurinol patients dropped out before day 28.  The intent to treat analysis showed a statistically insignificant 4.5 days longer DTR in the allopurinol group that was reduced to two days in the per protocol analysis.  Both groups had similar patient rated Likert pain scores at enrollment and at day 28.  The acute gout attack resolved in all patients by the end of the study. 

 

 

Treatment Group

 

 

Placebo

Allopurinol

P-value1

ITT2: Days to Resolution

 

 

0.13

N

19

16

 

Mean (SD)

12.53 (7.73)

17 (8.53)

 

SEM

1.77

2.13

 

Median [IQR]

14 [4, 20]

17.5 [13, 23]

 

Min, Max

3, 24

3, 28

 

 

 

 

 

PP3: Days to Resolution

 

 

0.5

N

16

14

 

Mean (SD)

13.44 (7.78)

15.43 (7.92)

 

SEM

1.95

2.12

 

Median [IQR4]

14 [7, 21]

15 [12, 22]

 

Min, Max

3, 24

3, 28

 

 

 

 

 

1 Wilcoxon test 2 ITT [N=35]: Intent-to-treat group. Analysis of all patients as randomized at beginning of study. 3 PP [N=30]: Per-protocol group. Analysis of patients that followed protocol. 4 IQR:  InterQuartile Range

Conclusion:  There is no difference in DTR or Likert pain scales between allopurinol and placebo groups treated for acute gout.  This supports the new ACR guidelines expert consensus that allopurinol may be initiated in acute gout, providing the acute attack is appropriately managed. 


Disclosure:

E. Hill,
None;

J. B. Higgs,
None;

K. Sky,
None;

M. Sit,
None;

A. N. Collamer,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/does-starting-allopurinol-prolong-acute-treated-gout/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology