ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meeting Abstracts
    • All Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2026
    • PRSYM 2026
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • Download Abstract Supplements
  • Keyword Index
  • My Favorites
    • View & print my favorites
  • Search

Home » Meeting Abstracts » ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2016

Abstract Number: 2769

Does Gender Make a Difference in “Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index (CPDAI)” in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis?

Gokce Kenar1, Handan Yarkan2, Berrin Zengin1, Gerçek Can2, Merih Birlik1, Nurullah Akkoc1 and Fatos Onen1, 1Rheumatology, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey, 2Rheumatology, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Email
Print

Meeting: ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2016

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Disease Activity, measure, psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis

Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Aspects and Treatment - Poster III

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  “Composite psoriatic disease activity index (CPDAI)” includes 5 domains: peripheral joints, skin, enthesitis, dactylitis, and spinal manifestations in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) which is a heterogeneous disease known with widely variable clinical courses. Experiences in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) studies suggest that female patients report more symptoms and poorer scores on most of the self-reported questionnaires, including Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) and AS Quality of Life [ASQoL]) despite fewer inflammatory spinal lesions or less radiographic damage as objective disease indicators with respect to male patients. The aims of this study are to investigate the relationship of CPDAI with other follow-up parameters and to evaluate gender differences in these measures in PsA patients.

Methods:  This cross-sectional study included patients with PsA followed up at a Rheumatology outpatient clinic at a university hospital. Disease activity was assessed in the patients by using the CPDAI, BASDAI, Visual Analogue Scale Global (VAS global) and Disease Activity Score (DAS28). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured in all the patients. The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) was used for the measurement of severity of psoriasis. The Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), BASFI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), ASQoL and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) were also evaluated. The correlations were investigated by Spearman’s correlation analysis (rho:<= 0.29 weak, 0.30-0.49 middle, >= 0.50 strong).

Results:  There were 117 patients with PsA (78 female) who fulfilled the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) (3). Their mean CPDAI score was 3.67 (±2.46). The CPDAI was found to be correlated with tender and swollen joint counts, dactylitis and enthesitis. There was a strong correlation between CPDAI and BASDAI, DAS28ESR, DAS28CRP and VAS global. Other follow-up parameters also correlated with CPDAI but no correlation was found between the CPDAI and ESR, CRP and BASMI. Mean CPDAI scores were similar in female and male patients. Female patients with PsA were found as having worse subjective scores including BASDAI, VAS global, BASFI, HAQ, ASQoL scores than males (p<0.05). Whereas objective disease parameters such as mean ESR and serum CRP levels, tender/swollen joint counts, DAS28 and BASMI scores were similar in both gender groups (Table 1).

Conclusion:  This study confirmed that the CPDAI, a new scale to assess disease activity in PsA patients was well correlated with other disease activity measurements. Although subjective disease scores (BASDAI, VAS global, BASFI, HAQ and ASQoL) was higher in female patients, CPDAI was not affected from gender.

Table 1. Demographic and Clinical Data and Disease Activity Measures in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis
 

Female patients

(n=78)

Male patients

(n=39)

p value

Mean age±SD (yrs) 48.1(±11.7) 45.5 (±12.6) 0.28
Mean education duration±SD (yrs) 8.8 (±4.2) 9.8 (±3.7) 0.26
Mean disease duration±SD (yrs) 7.9 (±8.7) 8.3 (±7.8) 0.80
Dactylitis (%) 6.4 (%) 10.2 (%) 0.48
Entesitis (%) 8.9 (%) 10.2(%) 0.82
CRP (mg/dL±SD) 8.8 (±11.1) 13.2 (±13.9) 0.09
ESR (mm/h±SD) 31.2 (±18.2) 29.3 (±23.2) 0.66
CPDAI (±SD) 3.63 (±2.4) 3.76 (±2.5) 0.79
Tender joint count (±SD) 2.5 (±3.0) 2.1 (±3.0) 0.55
Swollen joint count (±SD) 1.06 (±1.7) 1.1 (±2.1) 0.92
BASDAI (±SD) 4.61 (±2.6) 2.6 (±1.9) 0.00*
BASFI (±SD) 3.4 (±2.8) 1.6 (±1.6) 0.00*
BASMI (±SD) 28.7 (±11.2) 15.0 (±7.0) 0.13
DLQI (±SD) 5.75 (±6.6) 4.45 (±5.9) 0.32
PASI (±SD) 5.26 (±7.6) 8.83 (±11.6) 0.12
HAQ (±SD) 0.85 (±0.7) 0.60 (±0.5) 0.04*
ASQoL (±SD) 8.63 (±5.8) 5.70 (±5.4) 0.01*
VAS global (±SD) 46.12 (±30.5) 30.23 (±26.4) 0.00*
DAS28CRP (±SD) 2.67 (±1.08) 2.53 (±1.08) 0.53
DAS28ESR (±SD) 3.67 (±1.2) 3.25 (±1.4) 0.15
*p<0.05

References: 1. Taylor W. et al. CASPAR Study Group. Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis: development of new criteria from a large international study. Arthritis Rheum, 2006;54(8):2665-73.


Disclosure: G. Kenar, None; H. Yarkan, None; B. Zengin, None; G. Can, None; M. Birlik, None; N. Akkoc, None; F. Onen, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kenar G, Yarkan H, Zengin B, Can G, Birlik M, Akkoc N, Onen F. Does Gender Make a Difference in “Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index (CPDAI)” in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/does-gender-make-a-difference-in-composite-psoriatic-disease-activity-index-cpdai-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/does-gender-make-a-difference-in-composite-psoriatic-disease-activity-index-cpdai-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis/

My Favorites

Save and print abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract (must have cookies enabled in browser). See saved favorites.

Abstract Policies

  • ACR Convergence Abstract Embargo Policies
  • ACR Convergence Abstract Permissions & Reprints
  • PRSYM Abstract Policies

ACR Convergence. Where Rheumatology Meets

ACR Convergence 2026

Join us November 6-11 in Orlando, Florida.
See Registration Information

  • Contact ACR
  • Privacy Policy
  • ACR Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology