ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1975

Do You Believe in Exercise for Osteoarthritis? Exploring Differences in Participant Characteristics with Treatment Beliefs in Exercise for Knee Osteoarthritis

Sydney Liles1, Jason Jakiela2, Thomas Bye2, Jennifer Copson2 and Daniel White2, 1University of Delaware, Elkton, MD, 2University of Delaware, Newark, DE

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Demographics, exercise, functional status, Osteoarthritis, pain

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Title: (1973–1976) Orthopedics, Low Back Pain, & Rehabilitation Poster

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability and functional limitation in older adults. Treatments for knee OA focus on symptom management, with physical activity, e.g., exercise, receiving high recommendations. However, misconceptions about exercise are common, affecting an individual’s beliefs about the benefits of exercise. Currently, little is known about the characteristics of those who have high positive and high negative beliefs about exercise. This study aims to explore how demographic factors, baseline physical activity (steps/day), and knee related outcomes differ between those with positive and negative treatment beliefs related to exercise in adults with knee OA.

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of baseline data from a clinical trial examining a telehealth physical therapy intervention for adults with knee OA. Included were adults within the United States who met the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence criteria for knee OA ( > 45 years, activity related knee pain, and < 30 min of morning stiffness) and did not regularly exercise. Positive and Negative treatment beliefs were measured using the Treatment Beliefs in Knee and Hip OA (TOA) Physical Exercise (PE) questionnaire which include positive and negative subscales. High positive beliefs were defined as scores greater than 14 on the positive subscale while high negative scores were defined as scores greater than 8 on the negative subscale. These represent more than neutral agreement to positive/negative beliefs. We reported subject characteristics stratified by High Positive and High Negative Beliefs, which included age, sex, BMI, race, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain, steps/day, Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Survey Activities of Daily living subscale score (KOOS ADL), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Function subscale score (WOMAC Function).

Results: 126 participants (mean age = 59.9 years old, 82% female, mean BMI = 36.2 kg/m2) were included in the analysis (Table 1). Of those included, 73% (92/126) of the sample had high positive treatment beliefs and 26% (33/126) had high negative treatment beliefs. The high positive belief sample had a smaller proportion of females (77.1% vs 94.1%) than the low positive belief sample. Participants with high negative beliefs tended to be younger (56.4 years vs 61.2 years), had a higher BMI (39.1 kg/m2 vs 35.2 kg/m2), had higher pain (72.6 vs 63.6), had higher daily step count (4028.4 steps/day vs 3567.9 steps/day), and worse WOMAC physical function scores (28.3 vs 23.8) than those with low negative beliefs. (Table 2).

Conclusion: While the demographic makeup of individuals with high versus low positive treatment beliefs were relatively similar outside of sex, there may be some differences for high versus low negative treatment beliefs. A limitation to this study is that these differences were not formally tested due to relatively small sample size. This exploratory examination of group characteristics suggests that differences in treatment beliefs may be related to some patient characteristics, pain, and functional outcomes, however further research is needed to formally study these potential differences.

Supporting image 1

Table 1: Baseline Characteristics of Overall Sample

Supporting image 2

Table 2: Baseline Characteristics by Positive and Negative TOA PE Subscale Scores


Disclosures: S. Liles: None; J. Jakiela: None; T. Bye: None; J. Copson: None; D. White: Viatris, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Liles S, Jakiela J, Bye T, Copson J, White D. Do You Believe in Exercise for Osteoarthritis? Exploring Differences in Participant Characteristics with Treatment Beliefs in Exercise for Knee Osteoarthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/do-you-believe-in-exercise-for-osteoarthritis-exploring-differences-in-participant-characteristics-with-treatment-beliefs-in-exercise-for-knee-osteoarthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/do-you-believe-in-exercise-for-osteoarthritis-exploring-differences-in-participant-characteristics-with-treatment-beliefs-in-exercise-for-knee-osteoarthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology