ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1230

Do Serum Urate-Associated Genetic Variants Influence Gout Risk in People on Diuretics? Analysis of the UK Biobank

Ravi Narang1, Greg Gamble 1, Amanda Phipps-Green 2, Ruth Topless 3, Murray Cadzow 3, Lisa Stamp 4, Tony Merriman 5 and Nicola Dalbeth 1, 1University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, 2University of Otago, Otago, Otago, New Zealand, 3University of Otago, Otago, New Zealand, 4University of Otago, Christchurch, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand, 5University of Otago, Birmingham, AL

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: genetics and diuretic, gout

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: Metabolic & Crystal Arthropathies Poster II: Clinical Trials & Basic Science

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Genome-wide association studies have identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with serum urate and gout. An association between diuretic use and gout has also been reported by many investigators. The aim of this study was to examine whether serum urate-associated genetic variants differ in their influence on gout risk in people taking a diuretic compared to those not taking a diuretic, and to test for interactions between these genetic variants and diuretic use for gout association.

Methods: This research was conducted using the UK Biobank Resource. Participants of European ethnicity, aged 40-69 years, and with genome-wide genotypes were included. Gout was defined using a validated definition (self-report of gout or urate-lowering therapy use). Medication use (including diuretics) and co-morbidity data were collected via self-report. The 10 serum urate-associated SNPs with the strongest association for gout as reported by Cadzow et al (Arthritis Res Ther 2017) were tested for their association with gout according to diuretic use. Gene-diuretic interactions for gout association were tested using a genetic risk score (GRS) and individual SNPs by logistic regression adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, kidney failure, heart failure and hypertension.

Results: Data were available for 359,876 participants, including 7,342 gout cases (2.0%). Gout was present in 1,197 (4.0%) diuretic users and 6,145 (1.9%) non-diuretic users; OR [95% CI] 2.21 [2.08-2.36] for diuretic users compared to non-diuretic users. After adjustment, use of a loop diuretic was positively associated with prevalent gout (OR 2.34 [2.08-2.63]), but thiazide diuretics were inversely associated with prevalent gout (OR 0.60 [0.55-0.66]). Compared with a lower GRS (below the mean), a higher GRS (mean or higher) was positively associated with gout in those not on diuretics (OR 2.63 [2.49-2.79]), in those on loop diuretics (OR 2.04 [1.65-2.53]), in those on thiazide diuretics (OR 2.70 [2.26-3.23]), and in those on thiazide-like diuretics (OR 2.11 [1.37-3.25]) with similar ORs and overlapping confidence intervals (Figure). The use of a loop diuretic with the presence of a higher GRS exerted the highest ORs for gout association; compared to non-diuretic users with a lower GRS, the OR for gout was 6.04 [5.18-7.04] in loop diuretic users with a higher GRS.

Conclusion: In people on diuretics, serum urate-associated genetic variants contribute strongly to gout risk, with a similar effect to that observed in those not taking a diuretic. These findings suggest that the contribution of genetic variants is not restricted to people with ‘primary’ gout and genetic variants play an important role in gout susceptibility in the presence of other risk factors.

Figure: Association between genetic risk score -GRS- and gout according to diuretic use. Data were adjusted by age, sex, body mass index, hypertension, renal failure and heart failure.


Disclosure: R. Narang, None; G. Gamble, None; A. Phipps-Green, None; R. Topless, None; M. Cadzow, None; L. Stamp, None; T. Merriman, Ardea Biosciences, 2, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, 2; N. Dalbeth, Abbvie, 5, 8, 9, Amgen, 2, AMGEN, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, 8, 9, Dyve, 5, 8, 9, Dyve BioSciences, 5, Hengrui, 5, 8, 9, Horiaon, 5, 8, Horizon, 5, 8, 9, Janssen, 5, 8, 9, Kowa, 5, 8, 9, Pfizer, 5, 8, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Narang R, Gamble G, Phipps-Green A, Topless R, Cadzow M, Stamp L, Merriman T, Dalbeth N. Do Serum Urate-Associated Genetic Variants Influence Gout Risk in People on Diuretics? Analysis of the UK Biobank [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/do-serum-urate-associated-genetic-variants-influence-gout-risk-in-people-on-diuretics-analysis-of-the-uk-biobank/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/do-serum-urate-associated-genetic-variants-influence-gout-risk-in-people-on-diuretics-analysis-of-the-uk-biobank/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology