ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1541

Distinct Regulation of T Helper Cell Differentiation By Biologic DMARD Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Shingo Nakayamada1, Satoshi Kubo1, Maiko Yoshikawa1, Naoki Yunoue1, Yusuke Miyazaki1, Kazuyoshi Saito1 and Yoshiya Tanaka2, 1The First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan, 2University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: biologic drugs and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), T cells

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy: Novel therapies, Biosimilars, Strategies and Mechanisms in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: In the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), T helper cells can differentiate into functionally distinct subsets, leading to the persistent inflammation and immune abnormality associated with the interactive activation between T cells and B cells. However, little is known about pathological T cell subset targeted by biologic DMARD (bDMARD) therapy such as TNF inhibitor and CTLA4-Ig. We investigated association between the phenotype of CD4+ T helper cells and CD19+CD20+ B cells and disease activity in patients with RA, and responsiveness to bDMARD treatment.

Methods: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were obtained from 86 patients with bio-naïve RA and 24 healthy donors (HD). The study included 25 patients treated with TNF inhibitors such infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab, and 15 patients treated with CTLA-4 Ig (abatacept). The blood samples were taken at baseline and week 24 after treatment. The phenotype of T cells and B cells was defined based on comprehensive 8-color flow cytometric analysis for human immune system termed “the Human Immunology Project” by NIH and FOCIS. The results were correlated with the clinical disease activity including the titer of RF and ACPA, CRP, ESR, MMP-3 and simplified disease activity index (SDAI).

Results: The proportion of effector memory T cells was higher in RA compared with HD, whereas the proportions of CD4+CXCR3+ Th1 cells and CD4+CCR6+ Th17 cells were not different between RA and HD. The frequency of CD4+CXCR5+ICOS+ activated Tfh cells was significantly increased and correlated with RF titer in patients with RA. For B cell subsets, the proportions of CD19+CD20+CD27–IgD– effector B cells and CD19+CD20–CD38+ plasmablasts closely correlated with CRP, ESR and MMP-3. TNF inhibitors and abatacept markedly improved the disease activity scores such as SDAI at 24 weeks post-treatment. Abatacept significantly decreased the proportions of effector memory T cells which consisted of activated Tfh and Th17 cells, and consequently the proportion of naïve T cells increased after abatacept therapy. By contrast, the proportion of naïve T cells has decreased after TNF inhibitors, but those of effector T cells mainly Th17 cell and CD19+CD20+CD27+IgD+ IgM memory B cells has inversely increased. The percentage of CD4+CCR4+CD25+CD127low regulatory T cells significantly decreased after treatment with abatacept and TNF inhibitors. 

Conclusion: These results imply that TNF blockade and CD28 co-stimulation blockade may alter contradictory changes of both T helper cell and B cell differentiation, i.e. abatacept decreases activated Tfh cells and Th17 cells whereas TNF inhibitor increases Th17 cells and memory B cells, even though both treatments improve the disease activity in patients with RA. Thus, abnormal regulation of T helper cell differentiation independent of inflammation may underlie in the pathogenesis of RA and needs to be borne in mind in the design of new therapeutic strategies for this disease.


Disclosure:

S. Nakayamada,
None;

S. Kubo,
None;

M. Yoshikawa,
None;

N. Yunoue,
None;

Y. Miyazaki,
None;

K. Saito,
None;

Y. Tanaka,

BMS, MSD, Chugai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Astellas, Abbvie and Daiichi-Sankyo,

2,

UCB, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Abbott, Abbvie, Eisai, Chugai, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda, Astellas, Daiichi-Sankyo, GSK, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Quintiles, MSD and Asahi Kasei,

5,

UCB, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Abbott, Abbvie, Eisai, Chugai, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda, Astellas, Daiichi-Sankyo, GSK, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Quintiles, MSD and Asahi Kasei,

8.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/distinct-regulation-of-t-helper-cell-differentiation-by-biologic-dmard-therapy-in-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology