ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1820

Discordance of Hip Pain with Radiographic Hip Osteoarthritis: The Osteoarthritis Initiative

Chan Kim1, Michael C. Nevitt2, Pia M. Jungmann3, Irina Tolstykh4, Nancy E. Lane5, Thomas M. Link6 and David T. Felson7, 1Rheumatology, Boston University, Boston, MA, 2Epidemiology & Biostatistics, UCSF (University of California, San Francisco), San Francisco, CA, 3Radiology, Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Munich, Germany, 4Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 5Internal Medicine, Center for Musculoskeletal Health, UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, 6Musculoskeletal Quantitative Imaging Research Group, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 7Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Institute of Inflammation and Repair, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Osteoarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Osteoarthritis - Clinical Aspects I: Imaging in Osteoarthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose

It is assumed that persons with hip pain from osteoarthritis (OA) are likely to have radiographic OA, making it possible to readily diagnose disease, but there is little data addressing the agreement of hip pain with x-ray OA.  We previously reported poor agreement between hip pain and RHOA (radiographic hip osteoarthritis) in the Framingham population.  However, the Framingham study used long limb x-rays that may have yielded imperfect RHOA estimates.   We examined concordance of hip pain and RHOA in the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) where subjects obtained pelvis x-rays and were asked a more comprehensive set of questions about hip pain.   

Methods

OAI is a multicenter longitudinal cohort study of OA that included 4796 individuals aged 45-79.  AP pelvis x-rays were obtained, and definite RHOA was defined using UCSF criteria:  1) definite osteophytes plus definite JSN (both score ≥ 2) OR 2) definite osteophytes or definite JSN plus sclerosis, cysts or femoral head flattening OR 3) definite femoral osteophytes regardless of other features OR 4) definite moderate-severe JSN (superolateral JSN >=2 or superomedial JSN >=3) regardless of other features.   Using a card with visual homunculus, subjects were asked whether they had hip pain on most days in a month.  Those who said ‘yes’ were defined as having frequent hip pain and were asked another question for location of pain: groin, front of the leg (anterior), outside the leg (lateral), lower back, buttocks, or ‘don’t know’.  The pain evaluation was done for both hips.  We examined sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp) and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) for location specific pain with RHOA.  Sn was defined as % of hips with RHOA that had hip pain.  PPV was % of hips with pain that have RHOA.  To ensure that we included hips that may have OA and to increase our sensitivity, we did another analysis for possible RHOA.

Results

X-rays from 8732 hips were evaluated.  The prevalence of definite RHOA was 6.3%, and possible RHOA was 12.3%. For definite RHOA, the Sn of frequent hip pain was only 23.8%, and the Sp was 84.1% and the PPV for hip pain was only 9.1% (table 1).  However, for analysis restricted to hip pain localized to the groin, the PPV rose to 16.5%.  Of those with RHOA, only 7.1% had pain localized to the groin.  Anterior hip pain resulted similarly to groin pain, but performance for other sites was diagnostically poorer.  For possible RHOA (data not shown), the diagnostic test performance did not differ greatly from definite RHOA.   

Conclusion

We found poor agreement between hip pain on most days and RHOA in the ipsilateral hip. Hip pain questions with the highest PPV were hip pain with groin or anterior pain, but most persons with this pain had negative radiographs for hip OA suggesting that x-rays are insensitive to the presence of disease.  Many middle aged and older persons with chronic hip joint area pain may have OA even though x-rays are negative.

table 1


Disclosure:

C. Kim,
None;

M. C. Nevitt,
None;

P. M. Jungmann,
None;

I. Tolstykh,
None;

N. E. Lane,
None;

T. M. Link,
None;

D. T. Felson,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/discordance-of-hip-pain-with-radiographic-hip-osteoarthritis-the-osteoarthritis-initiative/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology