ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2279

Discontinuation Pattern of Glucocorticoids in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Initiating Biologics or Targeted Synthetic DMARDs in Routine Care

Isabel Castrejon1, Lucia Otero-Varela2, José María Álvaro-Gracia3, Jerusalem Calvo Gutierrez4, Cristina Campos-Fernández5, Alicia García Dorta6, Ana Perez7, DOLORES RUIZ MONTESINO8 and Fernando Sánchez-Alonso9, and on behalf of BIOBADASER, 1Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain, 2Spanish Society of Rheumatology, Madrid, Spain, 3Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain, 4HU Reina Sofia, Cordoba, Spain, 5Consorci Hospital General Universitari de València, Comunitat Valenciana, Spain, Valencia, Spain, 6Rheumatologist, La Laguna, Spain, 7Hospital Universitario Principe de Asturias, Alcala de Henares, Madrid, Spain, 8Hospital Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain, 9Sociedad Española de Reumatología, Madrid, Spain

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Anti-TNF Drugs, glucocorticoids, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 18, 2024

Title: RA – Treatment Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Glucocorticoids (GC) have a rapid effect on symptoms, but chronic exposure is associated to important adverse events. Although both EULAR and ACR guidelines (1,2), recommend to use the lowest effective dose for less than three months as bridging therapy, prednisone is used often for periods longer than six months in clinical practice. The greater availability of advanced therapies should help physicians to discontinue GC when low disease activity is achieved. We aim to compare the GC-sparing effect of biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARD) among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a real-life multicenter cohort and to identify predictors associated to GC discontinuation.

Methods: A total of 3,384 RA patients from a multicenter cohort initiating a first line treatment with a b/tsDMARD -TNFi, anti-IL6, anti-CD20, JAKi, and CTLA4-Ig- were identified. Concomitant GC use at treatment initiation was 56.4%. As TNFi was the larger group, a random sample was taken for comparison purposes. Patients with at least one-year follow-up were included in the analysis. The main outcome was GC discontinuation after one-year, assessed with a multivariate logistic regression. Baseline characteristics were analysed according to GC status. Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression, adjusted for patient, disease and treatment characteristics, were used to evaluate GC discontinuation in patients with GC at baseline.

Results: A total of 557 RA patients were included, 182 treated with TNFi, 82 with anti-IL6, 45 with anti-CD20, 139 with JAKi, and 109 with CTLA4-Ig. At one-year, GC use decreased similarly in all treatment groups compared to TNFi [odds ratio for discontinuation 0.95 (0.53 – 1.70) for anti-IL6, 0.81 (0.39 – 1.69) for anti-CD20, 1.07 (0.65 – 1.75) for JAKi, and 0.74 (0.41 – 1.31) for CTLA4-Ig]. There were no differences at baseline according to GC status after one year (Table). The proportion on GC was reduced in a gradual manner over time (Figure 1), and the proportion of patients with GC discontinuation after 1-year follow-up was: 41.7% for TNFi, 41.5% for anti-IL6, 31.1% for anti-CD20, 43.2% for JAKi, and 30.3% for CTLA4-Ig. Compared to TNFi, adjusted hazard ratios were 1.09 (0.70-1.70) for anti-IL6, 1.07 (0.59-1.95) for anti-CD20, 1.31 (0.91-1.91) for JAKi, and 0.80 (0.51-1.28) for CTLA4-Ig.

Conclusion: Our data showed that GC were frequently prescribed when initiating b/tsDMARDs, and still used after 1-year follow-up in many patients. Only between 30% with CTLA4-Ig4 and 43% with JAKi patients discontinued GC after one-year follow-up in our cohort. We did not identify any predictor of discontinuation at baseline.

Supporting image 1

Table: Baseline characteristics by GC status at one year

Supporting image 2

Figure: Survival curves of GC discontinuation across treatment


Disclosures: I. Castrejon: None; L. Otero-Varela: None; J. Álvaro-Gracia: None; J. Calvo Gutierrez: None; C. Campos-Fernández: None; A. García Dorta: None; A. Perez: None; D. RUIZ MONTESINO: None; F. Sánchez-Alonso: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Castrejon I, Otero-Varela L, Álvaro-Gracia J, Calvo Gutierrez J, Campos-Fernández C, García Dorta A, Perez A, RUIZ MONTESINO D, Sánchez-Alonso F. Discontinuation Pattern of Glucocorticoids in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Initiating Biologics or Targeted Synthetic DMARDs in Routine Care [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/discontinuation-pattern-of-glucocorticoids-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-initiating-biologics-or-targeted-synthetic-dmards-in-routine-care/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/discontinuation-pattern-of-glucocorticoids-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-initiating-biologics-or-targeted-synthetic-dmards-in-routine-care/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology