ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 521

Discontinuation of Disease Modifying Drugs Due to Inefficacy in Patients with Incident Rheumatoid Arthritis

Zulema Rosales Rosado1, pia Lois 1, Arkaitz Mucientes Ruiz 1, Esperanza Pato Cour 1, Dalifer Freites Nuñez 2, Juan Angel Jover Jover 1, lydia Abasolo Alcazar 1 and Leticia León 3, 1HOSPITAL CLINICO SAN CARLOS, MADRID, Spain, 2Hospital Clínico San Carlos, MADRID, Spain, 3Fundación para la Investigación Biomedica, Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Clinical Response, Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, Early Rheumatoid Arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, treatment and longitudinal studies

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: RA – Treatments Poster I: Novel Treatments

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) has undergone a big change in the last two decades with the Disease Modifying Drugs (DMARDs). These drugs are widely used in clinical practice, but we have little information about their discontinuation in this conditions especially due to inefficacy. Purpose: to describe the discontinuations of DMARDs due to inefficacy, their causes in patients with incident RA, and to evaluate possible associated factors to inefficacy.

Methods: We conducted an observational longitudinal study. Patients: all recent onset RA diagnosed between January 1st 2007 and December 31st 2015 followed in outpatient clinic at Hospital Clinico San Carlos until January 1st 2017, which used any DMARD (synthetic and biologic) during at least 3 months. Primary outcome: discontinuation of the DMARD due to inefficacy. Covariables: sociodemographic, clinical and treatments. Incidence rates of discontinuation (IR) per 100 patient-years were estimated using survival techniques with their respective 95% confidence interval [CI]. Factors associated with DMARDs discontinuation due to inefficacy was performed using Cox regression models, and results were expressed in Hazard ratio (HR) and [CI].

Results: We included 2388 courses of DMARD treatment in 814 patients (3706.14 patient-years). 77.52% were women with a mean age at diagnosis of 57.53±15.50 years. There were 1094 DMARDs discontinuations of the 2388 courses (45.81%) in 438 patients, of these 149 in 110 patients (13.5%) were due to inefficacy (IR: 4.0[3.4-4.7]). Most patients discontinuing due to inefficacy were women (87.50%) with a mean age at diagnosis of 52.40±13.50 years. 33.5% of the discontinuations due to inefficacy were biological DMARDs. 61.7% were in combined therapy and most of them (77.18%) discontinued during successive courses of therapy. IRs are shown in table 1. The multivariate analysis (table 2) was adjusted by age, gender and disease activity (ESR). Interestingly, younger age and depression also increased the risk of inefficacy. Combined therapy, second courses, dose of glucocorticoids and biologic vs synthetic DMARDs (HR: 3.12 [1.8-5.2]) increased the risk. We repeated the multiple regression model with all the sociodemographic and clinical variables shown in table 2 but changing the reference category of DMARD and found that Certolizumab (HR: 5.0[2.5-9.8]) had the highest risk of discontinuation due to inefficacy compared to the other drugs followed by Abatacept (HR: 4.9[1.9-12.7]), Etanercept (HR: 2.3[1.3-4.2]) and Gold (HR: 1.9 [1.1-3.4]). MTX use (HR: 0.6 [0.42-0.87]) was a protective factor against discontinuation due to inefficacy.

Conclusion: Conclusions. Discontinuations of DMARDs in clinical practice due to inefficacy are frequent (13.5%) with an IR of 4%. We have found differences in discontinuation rates among DMARD with Certolizumab, Abatacept, Etanercept, and Gold being the drugs with the highest risk. MTX is a protective factor for discontinuation due to inefficacy. Caution should be taken in regard to discontinuation due to inefficacy in patients receiving glucocorticoids, biological DMARDs, combined therapy, in subsequent treatment courses, and those with depression.


table 1


table 2


Disclosure: Z. Rosales Rosado, None; p. Lois, None; A. Mucientes Ruiz, None; E. Pato Cour, None; D. Freites Nuñez, None; J. Jover Jover, None; l. Abasolo Alcazar, None; L. León, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Rosales Rosado Z, Lois p, Mucientes Ruiz A, Pato Cour E, Freites Nuñez D, Jover Jover J, Abasolo Alcazar l, León L. Discontinuation of Disease Modifying Drugs Due to Inefficacy in Patients with Incident Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/discontinuation-of-disease-modifying-drugs-due-to-inefficacy-in-patients-with-incident-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/discontinuation-of-disease-modifying-drugs-due-to-inefficacy-in-patients-with-incident-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology