ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 726

Digital Blood Perfusion Differences Between Black Africans and Caucasians with Systemic Sclerosis

Claudia Ickinger1, Valerie Lambrecht 2, Eustasius Musenge 3, Mohammed Tikly 1, Maurizio Cutolo 4 and Vanessa Smith 5, 1Division of Rheumatology, Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Joahnnesburg, South Africa, 2Department of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium, 3School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, 4Research Laboratory and Academic Division of Clinical Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genova, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy, Genoa, Italy, 5Dept. of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Dept. of Internal Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Unit for Molecular Immunology and Inflammation, VIB Inflammation Research Center (IRC), Ghent, Belgium, Gent, Belgium

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: Systemic Sclerosis & Related Disorders – Clinical Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Microvascular dysfunction is a prominent feature in SSc. Laser speckle contrast analysis (LASCA) has been shown to be a reliable tool to quantify skin blood perfusion (BP) in SSc (1,2). Patients of African descent have a more severe disease burden than their European counterparts (3). Data are lacking on race/ethnic related differences in peripheral BP measured by LASCA in SSc. The objective of this study was to assess and compare BP at the level of fingertips between black Africans and Caucasians.

Methods: Forty black Africans and 29 Caucasian consenting patients fulfilling 2013 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for SSc were enrolled at 2 different geographic sites. Cutaneous BP in the hands was assessed by LASCA, calculating flows in regions of interest created at the 2-5 volar and dorsal fingertips (4). Standardized protocols for instrumental, environmental and patient conditions were applied at both study sites (1). Median BP was reported as perfusion units (PU).

Results: With respect to demographic and clinical characteristics, the significant differences between the 2 cohorts were that blacks were younger (mean age 48.5±9.9 vs 55.5±12.3 years, p=0.01), had a longer disease duration (mean 9.2±7.1 vs 5.8±6 years, p=0.04), a greater proportion of the diffuse cutaneous disease (67.5% vs 17.2%, p< 0.001), and were more likely to be on vasodilator calcium channel blocker therapy (97.5% vs 37.9%, p< 0.0001), compared to Caucasians. In both groups the median BP values were significantly higher for the volar fingertips compared to dorsal fingertips (Blacks: 59.07 vs. 37.39 PU, p=0.0002; Caucasians: 131.89 vs. 96.64 PU, p=0.03). Table 1 shows the univariate analysis comparing the groups with respect to demographics, disease subsets, autoantibodies and selected clinical features in relation to volar fingertip BP measured by LASCA. Overall, the average BP was significantly lower in blacks compared to Caucasians (59.07 vs. 131.89, p=0.0001). Multivariable analysis showed that when using Caucasian females as the referent group, black females and males has significantly lower digital BP (t= -3.86, p< 0.0001; t= -2.93, p=0.005, respectively), with black females showing the lowest BP.

Conclusion: This study shows better BP at the volar fingertips compared to the dorsal fingertips in both groups. We found several differences in digital BP between blacks and Caucasians with SSc. Caucasian females had the best BP and black females had the most impaired digital BP. These racial differences in peripheral BP warrant further investigation of possible ethnic differences in endothelial function.

 

References: 1) Lambrecht V, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2016; 75: 1263-64. 2) Cutolo M, et al. Autoimmunity Reviews 2018; 17: 775-80. 3) Morgan ND, et al. Medicine 2017; 96 (51). 4) Ruaro B, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2014; 73: 1181-85


Table 1_ACR

Digital blood perfusion between black Africans and Caucasians with systemic sclerosis


Disclosure: C. Ickinger, None; V. Lambrecht, None; E. Musenge, None; M. Tikly, None; M. Cutolo, Boehringer, Actelion, Celgene, Bristol-Mayer Squibb, 2; V. Smith, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ickinger C, Lambrecht V, Musenge E, Tikly M, Cutolo M, Smith V. Digital Blood Perfusion Differences Between Black Africans and Caucasians with Systemic Sclerosis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/digital-blood-perfusion-differences-between-black-africans-and-caucasians-with-systemic-sclerosis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/digital-blood-perfusion-differences-between-black-africans-and-caucasians-with-systemic-sclerosis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology