ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 194

Differences in Total Knee Replacement Outcomes Based on Age

Leslie Harrold1, David Ayers2, Wenjun Li2, Vincent Pellegrini3, John Grady-Benson4, Jeroan Allison5 and Patricia D. Franklin2, 1Department of Orthopedics and Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, 2Orthopedics and Physical Rehabilitation, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, 3Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 4Connecticut Joint Replacement Institute, Hartford, CT, 5Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: osteoarthritis and outcomes, Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Orthopedics, Low Back Pain and Rehabilitation

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose The fastest growing segment of the population undergoing total knee replacements (TKR) are patients younger than <65 years, yet little is known regarding their outcomes as compared to older patients.  We examined, from a national sample of TKR patients, differences in clinical outcomes of pain and function following surgery based on age. 

Methods Patients undergoing primary TKR from 7/1/11 through 8/30/13 for osteoarthritis were identified from a national research consortium which enrolls patients from >130 surgeons across 22 states in the US.  The registry gathers data from patients, surgeons and hospitals on patient demographics, underlying type of arthritis, body mass index, non-arthritis comorbid conditions, arthritis in non-operative hip and knee joints, back pain, global function based on the Short Form 36 Physical Component Score (PCS), and mental health using the SF-36 Mental Component Score (MCS).  We evaluated both change in operative joint pain and function as well as the 6-month post-operative pain and function score based on the estimated Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS; range of 0-100 with higher being better).  Descriptive statistics were performed as well as linear and mixed model multivariable regressions examining differences based on age.

Results There were 1164 patients <65 years and 2012 patients ≥ 65 years who underwent primary TKR.  Younger patients were more likely to be nonwhite (8.7% vs. 5.0%, p<0.001), heavier (body mass index 33 vs. 30, p<0.001), with worse emotional health (51.5 vs. 53.9, p<0.001), fewer comorbid conditions (p <0.001), and greater number of non-operative painful hip and knee joints (p<0.03).  At the time of surgery, younger patients had greater pain (50.5 vs. 55.7, p<0.001) and functional impairment (53.2 vs. 54.9).  Overall both younger and older patients had substantial pain relief and functional gain, improvement of 30.4 - 32.6 and 28.7 - 29.4 respectively based on the KOOS.  In adjusted analyses, at 6-months post-operatively younger patients had slightly greater pain (-2.5, p <0.002) and less improvement in function (-2.2, p<0.016). 

Conclusion Both younger and older TKR patients had substantial pain and disability at the time of TKR and achieved substantial pain relief and functional gain following surgery.  However, younger patients had statistically significant less improvement in pain and function, although the clinical significance of this difference is unknown.


Disclosure:

L. Harrold,
None;

D. Ayers,
None;

W. Li,
None;

V. Pellegrini,
None;

J. Grady-Benson,
None;

J. Allison,
None;

P. D. Franklin,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/differences-in-total-knee-replacement-outcomes-based-on-age/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology