ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1239

Differences in Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Those Who Stay in Remission and Those Who Have Disease-Worsening Following Therapy Withdrawal in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Vivian Bykerk1, Jeffrey Curtis2, Paul Emery3, Boulos Haraoui4, Elaine Karis5, Greg Kricorian5, David Collier6, Priscilla Yen5 and Bradley Stolshek5, 1Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 2Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 3Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds and Leeds NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, United Kingdom, 4Institut de Rhumatologie de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada, 5Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 6Amgen Inc., Simi Valley, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 8, 2021

Title: RA – Treatments Poster II: PROs, Biomarkers, & Systemic Inflammation (1223–1256)

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Patients with RA in remission (REM) may experience disease-worsening (DW) following therapy change or withdrawal. The change in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after therapy withdrawal has not been well described. This analysis examined PRO changes in RA patients in REM at baseline from a clinical trial enacting medication withdrawal.

Methods: SEAM-RA was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized withdrawal, double-blind controlled study in patients with RA on methotrexate (MTX) + etanercept (ETN) (combo) who were in REM (Simplified Disease Activity Index [SDAI] ≤3.3). After randomization to either MTX or ETN withdrawal, patients who experienced an SDAI score >11 at any time following randomization or SDAI >3.3 and ≤11 during 2 consecutive visits ≥2 weeks apart or on ≥3 separate visits were considered to have DW. Patients with DW resumed or continued MTX + ETN (rescue therapy). Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA), Patient Assessment of Joint Pain (PtJP), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) were administered at baseline and Weeks 24 and 48 and also at Weeks 12 and 36 for PtGA and PtJP. Over the 48-week period, PROs were evaluated by a change (worsening or improvement) greater than the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the instrument/domain. We present cumulative data for patients with PRO change ≥MCID from baseline. Among these patients experiencing DW, we also present improvement after time of worsening.

Results: Of 253 enrolled patients, 132 maintained REM and 121 experienced DW. A greater proportion of DW than REM patients had worse PtGA scores at a ≥20-point change from baseline (62.8% vs 16.0%) and at a >10-point change from baseline (74.4% vs 27.5%) (Table 1). This pattern also was observed for PtJP and Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGA) (Table 1). Median time to PtGA worsening >MCID ( >10) was 169 days in DW patients and was shorter than median time to overall DW (198 days in the MTX group, not evaluable due to cumulative probability of DW always < 50% in the ETN and combo groups). A higher percentage of patients in DW vs REM deteriorated >MCID on the HAQ-DI (≥0.35) (45.0% vs 23.8%), SF-36 Mental Component Summary (≤−2.5) (57.5% vs 44.6%), and SF-36 Physical Component Summary (≤−2.5) (68.3% vs 47.7%) scores (Table 1). Among DW patients with a ≥20-point change from baseline in PtGA and PtJP, a greater proportion of those who received rescue therapy improved their scores than those who did not receive rescue therapy (72.6% vs 7.1% and 82.5 vs 0.0%, respectively) (Table 2). At Week 48, a higher proportion of REM vs DW patients were closer to their baseline values (< MCID) for PtGA (95.0% vs 78.1%) (Table 3); similar trends were observed for PtJP and PhGA.

Conclusion: Patients who experience a loss of REM also experience deterioration in their patient-reported global health assessment and additional joint pain. The changes in patient outcomes are experienced by more DW patients than those remaining in REM. Median time to PtGA worsening more than an MCID is shorter than median time to overall DW. DW patients who receive rescue therapy can regain their outcomes, but to a lesser extent than those remaining in REM.


Disclosures: V. Bykerk, Amgen Inc., 2, 6, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 6, Gilead, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, Regeneron, 2, 6, Sanofi-Genzyme, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 6; J. Curtis, AbbVie, 2, Amgen, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, Janssen, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Myriad, 2, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, Roche/Genentech, 2, UCB, 2, CorEvitas, 2, 5, Crescendo Bio, 5; P. Emery, Abbvie, 2, 5, 6, Sanofi, 2, 6, BMS, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, Gilead, 2, 6, Samsung, 2, 5, 6, Celltrion, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, MSD, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, Roche, 2, 6, Amgen Inc., 2, 6, Sandoz, 2, UCB, 1, 5, 6, Boehringer Ingelheim, 1, 5, 6, Merck, 1, 5, 6; B. Haraoui, Amgen Inc., 2, 6, AbbVie, 2, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, Merck, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 6, Celgene, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, Roche, 2, 6, Sandoz, 2, 6, Sanofi-Genzyme, 2, 6; E. Karis, Amgen Inc., 3, 11; G. Kricorian, Amgen Inc., 3, 11; D. Collier, Amgen Inc., 3, 11; P. Yen, Amgen Inc., 3, 11; B. Stolshek, Amgen Inc., 3, 11.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Bykerk V, Curtis J, Emery P, Haraoui B, Karis E, Kricorian G, Collier D, Yen P, Stolshek B. Differences in Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Those Who Stay in Remission and Those Who Have Disease-Worsening Following Therapy Withdrawal in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/differences-in-patient-reported-outcomes-between-those-who-stay-in-remission-and-those-who-have-disease-worsening-following-therapy-withdrawal-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/differences-in-patient-reported-outcomes-between-those-who-stay-in-remission-and-those-who-have-disease-worsening-following-therapy-withdrawal-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology