ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 718

Diagnosing Pulmonary Hypertension Using the Proposed 6th World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertensions New Definitions

Håvard Fretheim1, Øyvind Midtvedt 2, Torhild Garen 2, Arne Kristian Andreassen 2, Einar Gude 2, Øyvind Molberg 3 and Anna Maria Hoffmann-Vold 4, 1Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, 2Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 3University Hospital Oslo, Oslo, Norway, 4Department of Rheumatology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, Oslo, Norway

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: pah and ph, Systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: Systemic Sclerosis & Related Disorders – Clinical Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a feared complication in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and is associated with high mortality despite new treatment options. Pre-capillary PH is diagnosed by right heart catheterization (RHC) with mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) ≥25 mmHg and a pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) of ≤15 mmHg. The 6th World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension proposed new definitions for pre-capillary PH, lowering the mPAP value to ≥ 21 mmHg and including pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) ≥3.0 Wood Units (WU).  The aim of this study was to explore the impact on prevalence of PH in an SSc cohort by applying the new definitions.

Methods: All SSc patients from the Oslo University Hospital SSc cohort who had performed at least one RHC (n=191) were included. We used data from the first RHC with mPAP ≥ 21 mmHg when available. Using the current pre-capillary PH definitions, PH was defined as mPAP ≥25 mmHg and PAWP ≤ 15 mmHg. Borderline PH was defined as mPAP 21-24mmHg. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and PH due to interstitial lung disease (ILD) were defined as pre-capillary PH in absence or presence of ILD on high resolution CT scan with < / >10 % pulmonary fibrosis, respectively. Secondly, the newly proposed haemodynamic definitions for pre-capillary PH including mPAP ≥ 21 mmHg, PAWP ≤15 mmHg and PVR ≥3 WU were applied.

Results: Of the 191 SSc patients, 150/191 (79%) were female, 143/191 (75%) had limited cutaneous SSc and 85/191 (45%) were anti-centromere antibody positive. Mean age of the patients was 57 years and mean time from SSc diagnosis to PH diagnosis was 6 years. Using the current PH criteria 51/191 (27%) SSc patients were diagnosed with PAH, 36/191(19%) patients with PH-ILD and 45 (24%) patients with borderline PH. Using the newly proposed definitions the frequency of PAH and PH-ILD changed as shown in Figure 1. 24 patients had an mPAP ≥ 21 mmHg and a PVR value 2.0-2.9 WU. The mean mPAP in these 24 patients was 23.8 mmHg, the mean PAWP 10.1 mmHg, 20/26 (77%) were female and 16/26 (62%) were anti-centromere antibody positive.

Conclusion: Lowering the mPAP to ≥ 21 mmHg and including PVR ≥ 3.0 WU did not substantially change the PH prevalence in our cohort due to the PVR cut-off value. We still need more knowledge about the long-term outcome of SSc patients with pre-capillary PH when changing definitions for pre-capillary PH. Also, it will be important to decide how and when to treat these patients.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/diagnosing-pulmonary-hypertension-using-the-proposed-6th-world-symposium-on-pulmonary-hypertensions-new-definitions/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology