ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2125

Development and Validation of Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Children with Chronic Nonbacterial Osteomyelitis Using a Consensus and Data-Driven Approach

Farzana Nuruzzaman1, Natalie Rosenwasser2, Xing Wang3, Ava Klein3, Ian Muse4, Erin Balay-Dustrude5, Megan Nguyen6, Emily Deng3, Jonathan Akikusa7, Matthew Basiaga8, Lindsey Bergstrom9, Fatma Dedeoglu10, Bin Huang11, Jenna King12, Sivia Lapidus13, Tzielan Lee14, Cassandra Levesque15, Aleksander Lenert16, Lillian Lim17, Kimberly Martin18, Elizabeth Murray19, Melissa Oliver20, Karen Onel21, Seza Özen22, Lauren Potts23, Sara M. Stern24, Robin Villaverda25, Eveline Wu26, Ronald laxer27, Polly Ferguson28, Daniel Lovell29 and Yongdong (Dan) Zhao30, 1Stony Brook Children's Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, 2Seattle Children's Hospital, seattle, WA, 3Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, 4University of Washington, Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, 5University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 6Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, 7The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 8Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 9Patient/parent research partner, Harpswell, ME, 10Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, 11Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cinciannati, OH, 12Patient/parent Research Partner, Planation, FL, 13Joseph M. Sanzari Children's Hospital, Center for Discovery and Innovation, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Montclair, NJ, 14Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, 15Patient/parent research partners, DC district, DC, 16Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, 17University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 18Patient/parent research partners, Houston, TX, 19Patient/parent research partners, Lynnwood, WA, 20Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, 21HSS, New York, NY, 22Hacettepe University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey, 23Patient/parent research partners, Santa Cruiz, CA, 24University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 25Patient/parent research partners, Thorton, CO, 26UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada, 28University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, 29Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, 30Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Redmond, WA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Autoinflammatory diseases, Pediatric rheumatology

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: (2124–2158) Pediatric Rheumatology – Clinical Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis (CNO) is an inflammatory bone disease that can result in bone deformity, persistent pain and pathological fractures which is frequently treated empirically. Clinical trials to compare and evaluate medication efficacy necessitates quantifying a minimal clinically important difference (MCID). We aimed to develop and validate this metric in CNO.

Methods: A Delphi survey on priorities for defining MCID was sent to providers via the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA’s) CNO Workgroup (180 members). Using the survey’s results, 664 cases were identified from over 3000 real world patient visits from our multisite prospective registry (CHronic nonbacterial Osteomyelitis International Registry, CHOIR) to define MCID. The interval between visits was between 3 and 12 months. At least 1 or more values at the follow up visits had improved while no more than 1 value worsened. An expert panel of 13 international pediatric rheumatologists and 7 patient/caregivers reviewed the cases individually to determine if they showed MCID. Cases which did not reach consensus (80% agreement) were evaluated by >5 reviewers at an in-person consensus meeting. Reviewers were asked to vote whether a case demonstrated MCID. A decision tree was used to determine the cutoff point that best differentiated patients with and without MCID, and the model was validated using 10-fold cross-validation to ensure generalizability.

Results: A total of 80 providers (44% response rate) from 5 continents completed the survey. The frequency of items selected were listed and the absolute and relative change were reported (Figure 1). Cohort characteristics and parameters extracted from paired baseline and follow up visits are in Table 1. 638 (96%) of 664 paired visits reached consensus. 423 were classified as MCID, 215 as no MCID and 26 were inconclusive. A generalized linear model analysis showed that the change of pain level (p=0.03), baseline MRI lesion count (p=0.02), change of MRI lesion count (p< 0.001) and change of active spinal lesion on MRI (p< 0.02) were associated with the classification of MCID. The median [IQR] change of clinical disease activity score (CDAS) was -7 [-11,-4] in cases with MCID, compared to -2 [-5, 0] in those without MCID (p< 0.001). Decision trees based on all parameters or CDAS alone with accuracy of 0.73 and 0.71, respectively are in Figure 2.

Conclusion: A Delphi survey identified important variables to include when defining MCID per providers. We developed definitions for MCID, and specified measurement characteristics. A 30% improvement in these variables with improvement of CDAS by 3 were considered meaningful by providers and consensus data.

Supporting image 1Figure 1: Provider Priorities in Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference in CNO Delphi Survey

Results: Frequencies and Thresholds

Supporting image 2Table 1: Characteristics of Cohorts Used to Develop Definitions of Minimal Clinically Important Difference in CNO

Supporting image 3Figure 2: Decision Pathways for Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference in CNO


Disclosures: F. Nuruzzaman: None; N. Rosenwasser: None; X. Wang: None; A. Klein: None; I. Muse: None; E. Balay-Dustrude: None; M. Nguyen: None; E. Deng: None; J. Akikusa: None; M. Basiaga: None; L. Bergstrom: None; F. Dedeoglu: Sobi, 6, UptoDate, 9; B. Huang: None; J. King: None; S. Lapidus: None; T. Lee: None; C. Levesque: None; A. Lenert: None; L. Lim: None; K. Martin: None; E. Murray: None; M. Oliver: None; K. Onel: None; S. Özen: Novartis, 6, Pfizer, 6, Sobi, 6; L. Potts: None; S. Stern: None; R. Villaverda: None; E. Wu: Pharming Healthcare, Inc, 2, 6, Sumitomo Pharma, 2; R. laxer: Akros pharma, 2, Eli Lilly Canada, 2, Novartis, 2, Sanofi, 2; P. Ferguson: None; D. Lovell: AbbVie, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, Canadian Arthritis Society, 12, DSMB memberNIH-NIAMS and NIAID, Canadian Arthritis Society, Novartis, 2; Y. Zhao: american board of pediatrics, 4, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 5, UpToDate, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Nuruzzaman F, Rosenwasser N, Wang X, Klein A, Muse I, Balay-Dustrude E, Nguyen M, Deng E, Akikusa J, Basiaga M, Bergstrom L, Dedeoglu F, Huang B, King J, Lapidus S, Lee T, Levesque C, Lenert A, Lim L, Martin K, Murray E, Oliver M, Onel K, Özen S, Potts L, Stern S, Villaverda R, Wu E, laxer R, Ferguson P, Lovell D, Zhao Y. Development and Validation of Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Children with Chronic Nonbacterial Osteomyelitis Using a Consensus and Data-Driven Approach [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/development-and-validation-of-minimal-clinically-important-difference-for-children-with-chronic-nonbacterial-osteomyelitis-using-a-consensus-and-data-driven-approach/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/development-and-validation-of-minimal-clinically-important-difference-for-children-with-chronic-nonbacterial-osteomyelitis-using-a-consensus-and-data-driven-approach/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology