ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1860

Development and Validation of a Microrna Panel to Differentiate between Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, and Control Subjects

Michelle J. Ormseth, Joseph F. Solus, Quanhu Sheng, Fei Ye, Qiong Wu, Yan Guo, Annette M. Oeser, Ryan Allen, Kasey Vickers and C Michael Stein, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Disease Activity, MicroRNA, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: 4M086 ACR Abstract: RA–DX, Manifestations, & Outcomes II: DX & Prognosis I (1858–1863)

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short non-coding RNAs that regulate genes and have utility as disease biomarkers. Use of small RNA (sRNA) sequencing along with unbiased bioinformatics methods has the capacity to reveal new miRNA markers of disease. The objective of this study was to use sRNA sequencing and machine learning methodology to determine a miRNA signature panel capable of reliably differentiating patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from control subjects, and from patients with another autoimmune disease.

Methods: Plasma samples from 167 patients with RA and 91 control subjects frequency-matched for age, race and sex were used for RNA extraction and sequencing library preparation. Sequencing was performed using Illumina NextSeq500. Our in-house pipeline, TIGER, was used to quantify miRNAs. DESeq2 and random forest analyses were used to develop a prioritized list of differentially expressed miRNAs in RA compared to control subjects. Each of the miRNAs was validated by PCR in the same plasma samples. Using the PCR-based plasma concentrations of the miRNAs, we used lasso regression to select a final miRNA panel to distinguish between RA and control subjects. This panel was validated in a separate cohort of 32 patients with RA and 32 control subjects and in 12 patients with SLE. Panel efficacy was assessed by area under the receiver operative characteristic curve (AUC) analyses.

Results: Among the top 15 miRNAs selected separately by DESeq2 and random forest analyses, 12 miRNAs overlapped using both methodologies, thus a total of 18 miRNAs were selected for PCR validation. Using the PCR-based concentrations of the 18 miRNAs, a final panel that included miR-22-3p, miR-24-3p, miR-96-5p, miR-134-5p, miR-140-3p, and miR-627-5p was selected. The panel had an AUC=0.81 for differentiating RA and control subjects, and it was robust among those with seronegative RA (AUC=0.84), among patients whose RA was in remission (AUC=0.85), in a separate RA validation cohort (AUC=0.76), and among patients with SLE compared to control subjects (AUC=0.97). Three of the miRNAs had weak association with disease activity in RA by DAS28 score (miR-24-3p: Rho= -0.16, P=0.04; miR-96-5p: Rho= 0.16, P=0.04; miR-140-3p: Rho=-0.16, P=0.05), and none were associated with disease activity in SLE (SLEDAI).

Conclusion: A miRNA panel identified by unbiased bioinformatics approaches was able to differentiate between patients with RA, SLE and control subjects. The panel may represent an autoimmunity signature which is common to both RA and SLE patients and which is not dependent on active disease or seropositivity. Further studies will be necessary to confirm these findings.


Disclosure: M. J. Ormseth, None; J. F. Solus, None; Q. Sheng, None; F. Ye, None; Q. Wu, None; Y. Guo, None; A. M. Oeser, None; R. Allen, None; K. Vickers, None; C. M. Stein, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ormseth MJ, Solus JF, Sheng Q, Ye F, Wu Q, Guo Y, Oeser AM, Allen R, Vickers K, Stein CM. Development and Validation of a Microrna Panel to Differentiate between Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, and Control Subjects [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/development-and-validation-of-a-microrna-panel-to-differentiate-between-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-and-control-subjects/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/development-and-validation-of-a-microrna-panel-to-differentiate-between-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-and-control-subjects/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology