ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1394

Development and Pilot of a Patient Satisfaction Scale in Rheumatology

Antonia Valenzuela1, Khushboo Sheth2, Stanford Shoor2, Philip L. Ritter2 and Kate Lorig3, 1Immunology and Rheumatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, 2Immunology & Rheumatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, 3Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: patient preferences, practice improvement and rheumatologic practice

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, and Attitudes Poster I: Patient-Reported Outcomes

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Patient satisfaction has been studied as a performance improvement measure in clinical practice among patients with a variety of diseases, but to date there are no validated scales that evaluates it in rheumatic diseases. As part of the Patient Centered Care project in the Rheumatology Division, we developed and piloted a simple questionnaire to study patient satisfaction with the care they receive for their arthritis.

Methods: We developed a 12-item scale, and tested it on 70 patients in the Rheumatology clinic at Stanford University Hospital and Clinics. Based on these responses, we subsequently tested a revised 10-item scale (5 items targeting helpfulness of rheumatology team, and 5 items targeting satisfaction) on a national self-selected sample of 130 arthritis patients. Demographic data were collected including age, gender, race and ethnicity, country of origin, years of education, and perception on rheumatology team members. Following psychometric analysis of this larger sample, we developed a shorter and reliable six-item patient satisfaction scale.

Results:

Our sample (N=130) characteristics included 94% female, 88.4% self-identified as Caucasian, 3.9% Asian, 6.2% Black/African-American and 8.7% Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. Majority of patients (44.6%) were 60-69 years old, and 41.5% had a College degree. 37.7% identified a rheumatologist as part of their rheumatology team, whereas 39.2% mentioned other (e.g. PCP), 13.1% were not sure of the composition of their team, and only 10% mentioned their medical assistant. In addition, 82.9% identified themselves as part of their rheumatology team. 38.5% were seeing a rheumatologist. For the final scale development, we included only items with correlations below 0.9 to reduce redundancy in items. The final scale included 6 items (Table 1). Reliability of the final scale was very high; coefficient Alpha was 0.94 (raw) and 0.95 (standardized). Based on the results of this survey, mean patients satisfaction factor was 6.1± 2.7. Item scale correlations ranged from 0.60 to 0.87. The only demographic variable found to be correlated with satisfaction was identifying a rheumatologist as part of the rheumatology team (correlation 0.37 ± 0.5, p-value <.0001).

Conclusion: A simple and practical questionnaire to measure patient satisfaction with their rheumatology care was developed and piloted on 130 patients. This is a condition-specific scale, which may be useful in determining satisfaction with specific practices and possibly physicians.

Table 1. Items included in final rheumatology patient satisfaction scale

On a scale from 1 to 10, how satisfied are you with how your arthritis team works with you to:

  1. Know more about your arthritis
  2. Get to see your team when you feel you need to see them
  3. Solve problems related to my arthritis
  4. Set goals for the treatment of my arthritis
  5. Manage your emotions related to arthritis
  6. Decide when I need to make an office visit for my arthritis

Disclosure: A. Valenzuela, None; K. Sheth, None; S. Shoor, None; P. L. Ritter, None; K. Lorig, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Valenzuela A, Sheth K, Shoor S, Ritter PL, Lorig K. Development and Pilot of a Patient Satisfaction Scale in Rheumatology [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/development-and-pilot-of-a-patient-satisfaction-scale-in-rheumatology/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/development-and-pilot-of-a-patient-satisfaction-scale-in-rheumatology/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology