ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 704

Detection of dsDNA Antibodies By New Fluoroimmunoassay with Comparable Diagnostic Sensitivity and Specificity to Farr-Ria

Katja Lakota1,2, Tanja Kveder2, Tinka Svec2, Polona Žigon2, Ales Ambrozic3, Borut Božič2,4, Matija Tomšič2,5, Saša Čučnik2,4 and Snezna Sodin Semrl1,2, 1Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Science and Information Technology, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia, 2Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 3Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia, 4Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 5University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: anti-dsDNA

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster I: Biomarkers and Outcomes

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Antibodies against double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (anti-dsDNA) are a useful and valuable serological marker for diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Studies suggest strong correlation between increasing levels of anti-dsDNA and subsequent flares, particularly renal disease. The radioactive immunoassay (RIA) by FARR (FARR-RIA) has been utilized as the gold standard in the past for anti-dsDNA determination, detecting mostly high avidity antibodies. Additionally, enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) and immunofluorescence (Crithidia luciliae) (CLIF) both recognize also low avidity anti-dsDNA and ELISA also detects antibodies against ssDNA. There is a need for replacing FARR-RIA with a safer and more environmentally friendly immunoassay. To modify the detection of anti-dsDNA by FARR-RIA, by replacing the radioactive isotope 14C and other toxic reagents and evaluate the newly developed, environmentally-friendly fluoroimmunoassay (FIA) for daily laboratory and clinical practice.

Methods: We tested 759 sequentially collected samples for anti-dsDNA testing, with FARR-RIA and FIA (using Picogreen® as intercalating dye). The group consisted of 146 blood donors, 70 SLE, 25 antiphospholipid syndrome, 28 rheumatoid arthritis, 25 Sjögren’s syndrome and 465 patients with unknown diagnoses. Final results of both methods were calculated from difference of signal measured between supernatant (S) and precipitate (P) divided by the sum of signals in S and P.

Results: At cut-off value of 0.35, both diagnostic specificity and sensitivity were comparable using FARR-RIA and FIA. Diagnostic specificity in both methods was 100%, while diagnostic sensitivity for FARR-RIA and FIA were 50% and 53%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy for FIA was slightly lower compared to FARR-RIA, 0.781 vs. 0.887. There was comparable inter-accuracy of both methods in high positive results (CVFARR-RIA = 11%, CVFIA = 12%), while low positive results (CVFARR-RIA = 29%, CVFIA = 18%) showed greater variation. We confirmed comparable intra-repeatability in high positive results (CV = 2% for both methods) and low positive results (CVFARR-RIA = 33%, CVFIA = 28%). At high and low positive results comparable analytical accuracy was observed, while analytical sensitivity was higher in FIA. Neither ssDNA nor RNA affected the detection of anti-dsDNA. A correlation of 0.626 (p<0.01) was found between FARR-RIA and FIA positive results.

Conclusion: FIA and FARR-RIA showed comparable diagnostic specificity and sensitivity. Therefore, FARR-RIA could be replaced with FIA in daily laboratory routine practice for the detection of anti-dsDNA.


Disclosure: K. Lakota, None; T. Kveder, None; T. Svec, None; P. Žigon, None; A. Ambrozic, None; B. Božič, None; M. Tomšič, None; S. Čučnik, None; S. Sodin Semrl, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Lakota K, Kveder T, Svec T, Žigon P, Ambrozic A, Božič B, Tomšič M, Čučnik S, Sodin Semrl S. Detection of dsDNA Antibodies By New Fluoroimmunoassay with Comparable Diagnostic Sensitivity and Specificity to Farr-Ria [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/detection-of-dsdna-antibodies-by-new-fluoroimmunoassay-with-comparable-diagnostic-sensitivity-and-specificity-to-farr-ria/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/detection-of-dsdna-antibodies-by-new-fluoroimmunoassay-with-comparable-diagnostic-sensitivity-and-specificity-to-farr-ria/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology