ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2617

Design and Initial Results from a Cluster Randomized Trial of a Provider-Facing Immunization Dashboard to Improve Shingrix Vaccination in the Veterans Health Administration

Jing Li1, Cherish Wilson2, Gary Tarasovsky3, Sooyeon Kwon4, Mary Whooley3 and gabriela Schmajuk5, 1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 2UCSF / SFVA, San Francisco, CA, 3SFVA, San Francisco, 4Albany Stratton VAMC, Loudonville, NY, 5University of California, San Francisco, and San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: quality of care

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: Abstracts: Measures & Measurement of Healthcare Quality (2615–2620)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 3:30PM-3:45PM

Background/Purpose: Patients prescribed immunosuppressive medications are at increased risk for herpes zoster and related complications, and the American College of Rheumatology recommends the recombinant zoster vaccine (Shingrix) for most patients receiving these treatments. However, fewer than half of Veterans in the VHA receiving immunosuppressive therapy have received even one dose of the Shingrix vaccine. To address this gap, we developed a national EHR-based dashboard to promote guideline-concordant Shingrix vaccination across the VHA and deployed it using a wait-list randomized control trial design.

Methods: Using data from the VHA Corporate Data Warehouse, we identified patients eligible for Shingrix according to ACR vaccination guidelines. A PowerBI dashboard was created to display patient-level information (immunosuppressant use, vaccination status) and facility-level vaccination rates (Figure 1).All 131 VHA facilities were invited to participate in a waitlist-randomized trial of dashboard access. Seventy-three facilities responded to the invitation, and they were randomized to either “early access” (September 2024) or “late access” (Summer 2025), stratified by facility size and baseline percentage of patients vaccinated. Dashboard use was tracked using PowerBI user logs. The main outcome was the percentage of eligible patients with at least one dose of Shingrix, calculated weekly between June 2024 and March 2025 (38 weeks). A two-group interrupted time series (ITS) analysis was conducted to compare rates of improvement in early-access vs. late-access (control) sites.

Results: The 73 participating facilities served 79,357 Veterans prescribed immunosuppressive medications at baseline; 87% were age ≥50, 88% male, 73% white, and 89% non-Hispanic. The most common regimens were csDMARD monotherapy (37%) and biologic monotherapy (20%).Most facilities (79%) were high-complexity sites located in the North Atlantic (23%) or Southeast (25%) regions. At the 38 early-access sites, 71% (27/38) had at least one clinician access the dashboard at least once during the study period. Access peaked in the first month after launch and was more sporadic thereafter (median (IQR) number of sessions over the study period: 38 (38 – 114)).In this analysis of the first 38 weeks post-launch, Shingrix vaccination increased modestly from 57.1% to 59.5% across all sites. Early-access facilities saw a post-intervention increase of 0.07 percentage points (pp) per week, compared to 0.05 pp/week at control sites. The difference in trends was not statistically significant (difference: 0.02 pp/week; 95% CI: –0.01 to 0.05) (Table; Figure 2).

Conclusion: We designed an innovative wait-list randomized control trial of a provider-facing immunization dashboard to improve Shingrix vaccination. After 4 months of implementation, we observed no significant difference in Shingrix vaccination rates between early-access and control sites. This may reflect the typical 3–4 month interval between rheumatology visits. Longer follow-up, enhanced promotion of the dashboard, and additional clinician and patient education may be needed to realize the full impact of this intervention.

Supporting image 1Table. Percentage of patients with at least one Shingrix vaccine, overall and by groups at the beginning and the end of the study period

Supporting image 2Figure 1. Screenshot of the Shingrix immunization dashboard (fictitious data)

Supporting image 3Figure 2. Interrupted time series (ITS) analysis assessing Shingrix vaccination pre- and post-dashboard access for “early access” versus “late access” (control) facilities


Disclosures: J. Li: None; C. Wilson: None; G. Tarasovsky: None; S. Kwon: None; M. Whooley: None; g. Schmajuk: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Li J, Wilson C, Tarasovsky G, Kwon S, Whooley M, Schmajuk g. Design and Initial Results from a Cluster Randomized Trial of a Provider-Facing Immunization Dashboard to Improve Shingrix Vaccination in the Veterans Health Administration [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/design-and-initial-results-from-a-cluster-randomized-trial-of-a-provider-facing-immunization-dashboard-to-improve-shingrix-vaccination-in-the-veterans-health-administration/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/design-and-initial-results-from-a-cluster-randomized-trial-of-a-provider-facing-immunization-dashboard-to-improve-shingrix-vaccination-in-the-veterans-health-administration/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology