ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1736

Deep Immunophenotyping of T-Lymphocytes with a 37-Channel Mass Cytometry (CyTOF) Panel for the Identification of Pathological Cell Functions and the Prediction of Response to Biologic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Ben Mulhearn1,2,3, Darren Plant2, Ann W. Morgan4,5, Anthony G. Wilson6, John D Isaacs7,8, Jane Worthington9, Soumya Raychaudhuri9,10,11,12, Tracy Hussell1, Anne Barton13,14 and Sebastien Viatte2, 1Manchester Collaborative Centre for Inflammation Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, 2The University of Manchester, Arthritis Research UK Centre for Genetics and Genomics, , Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, Manchester, United Kingdom, 3Kellgren Centre for Rheumatology, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom, 4Section of Musculoskeletal Disease, NIHR-Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit and Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 5Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 6UCD School of Medicine and Medical Science, Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland, 7Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom, 8National Institute for Health Research Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom, 9Arthritis Research UK Centre for Genetics and Genomics, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, 10Divisions of Genetics and Rheumatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 11Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Technical Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 12Partners Center for Personalized Genetic Medicine, Boston, MA, 13Arthritis Research UK Centre for Genetics and Genomics, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK, Manchester, United Kingdom, 14The Kellgren Centre for Rheumatology, Central Manchester Foundation Trust, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: CyTOF, pathogenesis, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: T Cell Biology and Targets in Autoimmune Disease Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Pathogenic immune cell types and functions have not been identified yet in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This is explained by the impact of disease heterogeneity on study power and by the limited number of immune markers tested so far. Our lack of understanding of RA pathophysiology results in practising trial and error medicine with the prescription of biologic drugs: 30% of patients fail to respond to the first drug prescribed. Using the world-wide largest prospective cohort of RA patients undergoing treatment with biologics, we aim to identify immunological signatures of RA endotypes using a T cell mass cytometry (CyTOF) panel to define treatment response groups at baseline.

Methods: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) are isolated from patients enrolled in the Biologics in Rheumatoid Arthritis Genetics and Genomics Study Syndicate (BRAGGSS) prior to treatment with a biologic drug. One hundred RA patients with a DAS28 > 5.1 are enrolled prospectively each year in addition to healthy controls. Treatment response is assessed at 3, 6 and 12 months. PBMCs are stimulated for 4 hours using anti-CD3/anti-CD28 beads and stained with a 37-channel CyTOF panel which includes intracellular cytokines, transcription factors and co-stimulatory molecules to allow a detailed characterization of the function of T-cells (including Th1, Th2, Th17 and Treg). Data will be analysed using in house developed unbiased advanced computational strategies and clustering algorithms to define cellular clusters agnostically (Raychaudhuri’s lab). Our in house analytical pipeline (MASC: “Mixed model association of single cells”) will be compared with conventional biaxial gating and commercially available packages like CITRUS.

Results: Preliminary data on 10 healthy controls (HC) and 10 RA patients were available for analysis. Traditional biaxial gating showed large differences in the proportions of both Th1 cells (1-9 % in RA and 5-15 % in HC) and Th17 cells (0-9 %) within and between RA and HC. Depending on IFNγ and IL-17A expression in CD4+ T cells, individuals could be classified into 4 immunophenotypes: ‘Th1’, ‘Th17’, ‘double positive’, and ‘double negative’. CITRUS identified 3 clusters of cells which were significantly different in abundance between the HC and RA groups. As an example, one cluster was CD4+CD38+, had characteristics of regulatory T cells and was less abundant in RA. Preliminary analysis of the drug response data showed a strong increase in Th1 cells in responders seen only after in vitro stimulation, together with an increase of CD40L+ CD4+ and CD40L+ CD8+ T-cells.

Conclusion: These preliminary analyses show the potential of our study design to capture RA heterogeneity at the single cell level. Importantly, sample size needs to be increased and analytical algorithms further developed, which is achievable between now and November 2017. The systematic quantification of intracellular cytokines in targeted cell types is likely to identify cell functions involved in RA pathogenesis and treatment response.


Disclosure: B. Mulhearn, None; D. Plant, None; A. W. Morgan, None; A. G. Wilson, None; J. D. Isaacs, None; J. Worthington, None; S. Raychaudhuri, None; T. Hussell, None; A. Barton, None; S. Viatte, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mulhearn B, Plant D, Morgan AW, Wilson AG, Isaacs JD, Worthington J, Raychaudhuri S, Hussell T, Barton A, Viatte S. Deep Immunophenotyping of T-Lymphocytes with a 37-Channel Mass Cytometry (CyTOF) Panel for the Identification of Pathological Cell Functions and the Prediction of Response to Biologic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/deep-immunophenotyping-of-t-lymphocytes-with-a-37-channel-mass-cytometry-cytof-panel-for-the-identification-of-pathological-cell-functions-and-the-prediction-of-response-to-biologic-drugs-in-rheumat/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/deep-immunophenotyping-of-t-lymphocytes-with-a-37-channel-mass-cytometry-cytof-panel-for-the-identification-of-pathological-cell-functions-and-the-prediction-of-response-to-biologic-drugs-in-rheumat/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology