ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0585

Cycling to TNFi vs. Switching to IL-17Ai After a First TNFi Discontinuation Among Patients with PsA and axSpA: The CorEvitas PsA/SpA Registry

Alexis Ogdie1, Nicole Middaugh2, Maya Marchese2, Jessica A Walsh3, Natalia Bello4, Jeffrey Lisse4, Andris Kronbergs5, Elsie Grace6, Marcus Ngantcha4 and Philip Mease7, 1Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 2CorEvitas, LLC, Waltham, MA, 3Division of Rheumatology, Salt Lake City Veterans Affairs Health and University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, 4Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 5Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN, 6Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, 7Swedish Medical Center/Providence St. Joseph Health; University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Biologicals, Interleukins, Psoriatic arthritis, spondyloarthritis, Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 16, 2024

Title: SpA Including PsA – Treatment Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Treatment guidelines recommend tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and interleukin-17A inhibitors (IL-17Ai) as options for patients with PsA or axSpA with persistent disease activity despite conventional treatment (1-3). TNFi’s are commonly used first-line treatment in PsA and axSpA (4). There is little evidence available to inform selection of therapy after failure with TNFi treatment. This study compares the effectiveness of second TNFi (cycling) versus switching to IL-17Ai among patients with PsA and axSpA who discontinued a first TNFi.

Methods: This study included patients with a diagnosis of PsA or axSpA enrolled in the CorEvitas PsA/SpA Registry who initiated a second TNFi or IL-17Ai after discontinuation of a first TNFi. Patients were stratified into two cohorts, those who: 1) initiated a second TNFi (cyclers) and 2) initiated an IL-17Ai (switchers). The primary outcome among the PsA group was change from baseline (CFB) in cDAPSA and among the axSpA group was CFB in BASDAI, at 6-month follow-up. Linear regression models, for continuous outcomes, or Poisson regression models (5), for binary outcomes, were fit to each primary and secondary outcome to compare switching versus cycling after 6-month follow-up visit, using the inverse probability of treatment (IPT) weighted approach to account for imbalance in baseline covariates.

Results: The PsA cohort included 277 (59%) and 194 (41%) and axSpA included 119 (69%) and 53 (31%), cyclers and switchers respectively. Demographic and disease characteristics were largely comparable between groups for PsA and axSpA cohorts. Disease activity and PROs were generally higher in switchers; treatment characteristics were largely similar between both cohorts (Table 1). Overall, for PsA and axSpA cohort at 6-month follow up, switchers demonstrated numerically greater improvements compared to cyclers for both primary and secondary outcomes (Table 2). For IPT-weighted estimates, in the PsA cohort, switchers demonstrated a 0.7-point improvement in the primary outcome (95% CI: -2.7, 1.2; p=0.467) compared to cyclers, and in the axSpA cohort switchers displayed a 0.4-point improvement (95% CI: -1.0, 0.2, p=0.160) (Table 3). In the PsA cohort, PhGA of arthritis and psoriasis switchers had statistically significantly greater improvements compared to cyclers (-5.0; 95% CI: -9.3, -0.8, p=0.021). Similarly, in the axSpA cohort, improvement in patient fatigue was significantly higher in the switchers compared to cyclers (-9.4; 95% CI: -15.8, -3.1, p=0.004) (Table 3).

Conclusion: Findings from this real-world analysis suggest that switching from a TNFi to an IL-17Ai results in similar or numerically improved outcomes compared to cycling to a subsequent TNFi in both PsA and axSpA cohort. While additional research is needed, these results underscore the importance of considering alternate mechanisms of action as possible suitable options for patients discontinuing a first TNFi.

1. Coates, L C, Nat. Rev. Rheumatol., 18 (2022) 465.

2. Ramiro, S., Ann. Rheum. Dis., 82 (2023) 19.

3. Gossec, L., Ann. Rheum. Dis., 83 (2024) 706.

4. Caporali, R., Mod. Rheumatol, 34 (2024) 11.

5. Zou, G., Am. J. Epidemiol., 159 (2004) 702.

6. Austin, P.C., Statist. Med. 28 (2009) 3083.

Supporting image 1

Table 1: Patient demographics and health characteristics at index for PsA patients initiating a second TNFi (cycle) or IL_17i (switch) following discontinuation of a first TNFi with 6-month follow-up registry visit by cycling/switching status

Supporting image 2

Table 2: Mean (SD) of index, 6-month follow-up, and estimated difference (95% CI) from index to 6-month follow-up in continuous outcomes for cyclers and switchers, unweighted cohort for both PsA and axSpA initiators.

Supporting image 3

Table 3: Regression coefficients (β) and 95% CIs measuring the unweighted and IPT-weighted association between switching (reference cycling) and continuous outcome for both PsA or axSpA initiators.


Disclosures: A. Ogdie: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, Celgene, 2, CorEvitas, LLC, 2, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, Gilead, 2, GSK, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Takeda, 2, UCB Pharma, 2; N. Middaugh: CorEvitas, LLC, 3; M. Marchese: Corevitas, LLC, 3; J. Walsh: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Merck, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, UCB Pharma, 2, 5; N. Bello: Eli Lilly and Company, 3; J. Lisse: Eli Lilly and Company, 3, 11; A. Kronbergs: Eli Lilly, 3, 8, 11; E. Grace: Eli Lilly and Company, 3; M. Ngantcha: Eli Lilly, 3; P. Mease: AbbVie, 2, 5, Aclaris Therapeutics, 2, 5, Aclyrin, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, CorEvitas, 2, 5, Galápagos, 2, 5, Gilead, 2, 5, Inmagene, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Lilly, 2, 5, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, Sun Pharma, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ogdie A, Middaugh N, Marchese M, Walsh J, Bello N, Lisse J, Kronbergs A, Grace E, Ngantcha M, Mease P. Cycling to TNFi vs. Switching to IL-17Ai After a First TNFi Discontinuation Among Patients with PsA and axSpA: The CorEvitas PsA/SpA Registry [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cycling-to-tnfi-vs-switching-to-il-17ai-after-a-first-tnfi-discontinuation-among-patients-with-psa-and-axspa-the-corevitas-psa-spa-registry/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cycling-to-tnfi-vs-switching-to-il-17ai-after-a-first-tnfi-discontinuation-among-patients-with-psa-and-axspa-the-corevitas-psa-spa-registry/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology