ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2022

Could Initiation of Sodium Glucose Co-Transporter-2 Inhibitors Reduce the Need for Conventional Urate-Lowering Therapy and Flare Medications in Patients with Gout?Population-Based Target Trial Emulation Studies

Natalie McCormick1, Chio Yokose2, Leo Lu3, Sharan Rai1, Gregory Challener1 and Hyon K. Choi4, 1Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 2Massachusetts General Hospital, Waltham, MA, 3Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 4Massachusetts General Hospital, Lexington, MA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Administrative Data, comparative effectiveness, gout, Pharmacoepidemiology, population studies

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 18, 2024

Title: Metabolic & Crystal Arthropathies – Basic & Clinical Science Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) lower serum urate levels and are associated with reduced risk of incident gout as well as recurrent flares [Annals IM 2023; JAMA IM 2024].  For some gout patients (e.g., without substantial hyperuricemia or radiographic damage or tophi), this could translate to reduced use of urate-lowering therapies (ULT) as well as gout flare medications such as NSAIDs or glucocorticoids, which can lead to cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic adverse effects, particularly among those with multi-morbidity and polypharmacy. 

Our objective was to compare rates of initiation of allopurinol, as well as gout flare medication use (i.e., colchicine, NSAIDs, and glucocorticoids) among gout patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) initiating SGLT2i versus dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4i) or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA), two other second-line agents.

Methods: We followed the approach of Hernan and Robins to emulate two-arm randomized clinical trials (the target trials) that would randomize gout patients with T2D and no baseline use of ULT to initiate SGLT2i vs. GLP1-RA or DPP4i.  We used administrative health data covering nearly all residents of British Columbia, Canada from Jan 2014 to June 2022, including all dispensed prescriptions, regardless of funder.

Primary outcome was new prescription of allopurinol.  Secondary outcomes were number of prescriptions for colchicine, NSAIDs (indomethacin, most often used for gout flare) and glucocorticoids, and number of recurrent gout flares (defined by gout-primary outpatient and emergency visits, and hospitalizations).  Cox proportional hazards and Poisson regressions were used with 1:1 propensity-score matching (primary) and overlap weighting (sensitivity analysis) to emulate randomization.  The propensity score was constructed with >50 prognostic variables including comorbidities, medications, gout factors (duration, medication use, rheumatology encounters, baseline number of flares), socioeconomic status, and healthcare resource use.

 

Results: After matching, baseline characteristics of all treatment groups were well balanced (standardized mean differences < 0.1); the mean Charlson comorbidity score was 3.3.  In our primary analysis, SGLT2i use was associated with decreased probability of allopurinol initiation, with hazard ratios (HR) of 0.60 (95% CI: 0.49, 0.72) for SGLT2i vs. DPP4i and 0.72 (0.54, 0.95) for SGLT2i vs GLP1-RA, (Table 1).  Findings were similar when using overlap weighting of the propensity score.

SGLT2i was also associated with lower rates of colchicine, NSAID, and glucocorticoid dispensing (Table 2), and with lower rates of gout visits and recurrent flares (by 43% vs DPP4i and 27% vs GLP1-RA) (Table 3). 

Conclusion: While many gout patients will continue to require conventional ULT, for those with modest hyperuricemia and infrequent flares, the serum urate-lowering benefits of SGLT2i may negate the need for additional ULT, by reducing the rate of recurrent flares.  This could, in turn, reduce pill burden and exposure to the potentially harmful effects of NSAIDs and glucocorticoids, particularly for the highest risk patients with multi-morbidity and polypharmacy. 

Supporting image 1

Table 1: Initiation of Urate Lowering Therapy among Gout Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Following Initiation of SGLT2i vs. DPP-4i or GLP1-RA

Supporting image 2

Table 2: Colchicine, NSAID and Glucocorticoid Prescription Counts among Gout Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Following Initiation of SGLT2i vs. DPP-4i or GLP1-RA, after 1:1 Propensity-Score Matching

Supporting image 3

Table 3: Recurrent Gout Flare Count among Gout Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Initiating SGLT2i vs. DPP-4i or GLP1-RA


Disclosures: N. McCormick: None; C. Yokose: None; L. Lu: None; S. Rai: None; G. Challener: None; H. Choi: Ani, 1, Horizon, 1, 5, LG, 1, Protalix, 1, Shanton, 12, DSMB.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

McCormick N, Yokose C, Lu L, Rai S, Challener G, Choi H. Could Initiation of Sodium Glucose Co-Transporter-2 Inhibitors Reduce the Need for Conventional Urate-Lowering Therapy and Flare Medications in Patients with Gout?Population-Based Target Trial Emulation Studies [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/could-initiation-of-sodium-glucose-co-transporter-2-inhibitors-reduce-the-need-for-conventional-urate-lowering-therapy-and-flare-medications-in-patients-with-goutpopulation-based-target-trial-emulati/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/could-initiation-of-sodium-glucose-co-transporter-2-inhibitors-reduce-the-need-for-conventional-urate-lowering-therapy-and-flare-medications-in-patients-with-goutpopulation-based-target-trial-emulati/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology