ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 751

Coronary Plaque Burden in Patients with Lupus Compared to Healthy Volunteers

George Stojan1, Matthew Budoff2, Laurence Magder3, Jessica Li4, Armin Zadeh5, Erik Barr6 and Michelle Petri5, 1Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 2Cardiology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, 3Department of Epidemiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, 4Medicine (Rheumatology), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 5Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 6Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease, Lupus

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Poster I: Clinical Manifestations and Comorbidity

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Accelerated atherosclerosis leading to premature coronary artery disease remains the major cause of late death in SLE. We sought to characterize noncalcified and calcified plaque lesions in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and to compare the findings with a group of healthy controls.

Methods: A total of 70 patients who met the ACR or SLICC classification criteria for SLE were included in the study. All patients underwent coronary CT angiography. A total of 100 non-matched healthy controls were included in the study.  Coronary plaque area was measured by manual tracing for the difference between the area within the external elastic membrane and the area of the vessel lumen at the site of maximal luminal narrowing as observed on a cross-sectional coronary CT angiography image.

Results:

Table 1. Mean plaque volume (95% CI, in mm3 ) between study groups at baseline

SLE group (N=70)

Control group (N=100)

p-value

Total plaque volume

1547.88 (1435.54, 1660.22)

432.96 (338.62, 527.29)

<0.0001

Calcified plaque volume

29.79 (-36.16, 95.74)

265.27 (209.89, 320.66)

<0.0001

Non-calcified plaque (NCP) volume

1518.09 (1427.73, 1608.45)

167.68 (91.81, 243.56)

<0.0001

Table 2.   Mean (SD) of Calcified and Non-calcified Plaque, in each cohort, by age and sex

Sex

Age

Non-calcified Plaque

Calcified Plaque

JHU

UCLA

JHU

UCLA

n

Mean(SD)

n

Mean(SD)

p

n

Mean(SD)

n

Mean(SD)

p

Female

<44

18

1324.44 (464.69)

0

–          (-)

–

18

0 (0)

0

–          (-)

–

45-59

25

1416.36 (429.85)

3

244.83 (125.38)

<.0001

25

2.00 (4.83)

3

138.50 (186.60)

0.3327

60+

16

1562.06 (560.33)

21

111.04 (109.35)

<.0001

16

16.38 (28.54)

21

162.39 (165.96)

0.0007

Male

<44

2

1549.00 (548.71)

2

203.20 (287.37)

0.0916

2

0 (0)

2

122.20 (66.75)

0.2347

45-59

4

1670.75 (290.82)

22

227.97 (268.13)

<.0001

4

0.50 (1.00)

22

250.30 (265.18)

0.0002

60+

5

1919.60 (489.46)

52

215.31 (225.93)

0.0013

5

77.60 (69.37)

52

355.44 (400.42)

<.0001

Conclusion: SLE patients on average have a significantly higher burden of noncalcified plaque (p<0.0001) compared to controls, while surprisingly, the calcified plaque burden is lower (p<0.0001). The limitation of our study is the comparatively older age of the control group as well as the gender discrepancy, with males being predominant among the controls. Nevertheless, this discrepancy even further highlights the burden of high risk noncalcified plaque in SLE. 


Disclosure: G. Stojan, None; M. Budoff, None; L. Magder, None; J. Li, None; A. Zadeh, None; E. Barr, None; M. Petri, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Stojan G, Budoff M, Magder L, Li J, Zadeh A, Barr E, Petri M. Coronary Plaque Burden in Patients with Lupus Compared to Healthy Volunteers [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/coronary-plaque-burden-in-patients-with-lupus-compared-to-healthy-volunteers/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/coronary-plaque-burden-in-patients-with-lupus-compared-to-healthy-volunteers/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology