ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2398

Continued Participation in a 10-Year Tight Control Treat-to-Target Study in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Why Keep Patients Doing Their BeSt?

I.M. Markusse1, L. Dirven2, T.H.E. Molenaar3, N. Riyazi4, P.B.J. de Sonnaville5, P.J.S.M. Kerstens6, W.F. Lems7, T.W.J. Huizinga2 and C.F. Allaart2, 1Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 2Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 3Dept of Rheumatology, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, Netherlands, 4Rheumatology, Haga Hospital, The Hague, Netherlands, 5Rheumatology, Admiraal de Ruyter Ziekenhuis, Goes, Netherlands, 6Rheumatology, Jan van Breemen Research Institute | Reade, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 7Rheumatology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: longitudinal studies, Patient participation, patient questionnaires and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects (ACR): Impact of Various Interventions and Therapeutic Approaches

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: To identify risk factors for premature study termination and patients’ motives for adherence to a long term follow-up clinical trial in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: In 508 patients with early RA enrolled in the BeSt study, risk factors for premature study discontinuation were identified through univariable and then multivariable logistic regression analysis. In this analysis, for every patient ten endpoints were generated (still under follow-up at the end of a year, yes/no), and baseline characteristics and clinical characteristics as present in the preceding year of follow-up were entered as determinants. Patients who completed 10-year follow-up were asked to fill in a questionnaire on study experiences and possible motives for study adherence. 

Results: In total, 313/508 patients (62%) attended the final visit, and 288 (92%) filled in the questionnaire. Mean age of completers was 61 years and 67% were female. Based on 508 included patients, risk factors for early termination were a higher age (odds ratio, OR 1.04, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.03 – 1.06), worse functional ability during the preceding year (measured with the health assessment questionnaire, OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.27 – 2.08), having achieved drug-free remission during the preceding year (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.38 – 2.47) and suffering a severe adverse event during the preceding year (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.18 – 2.49). In the first part of the questionnaire, the majority of patients mentioned contributing to scientific research (97% of patients agreed), helping other patients (91%), ‘I have nothing to lose’ (80%), gaining understanding of new treatment strategies (84%) and of their disease (85%) as reasons to continue participation. Next, patients were asked to mark one or more possible reasons to continue participation. In total, 278 patients marked 912 reasons: tight disease control (202/278 patients), good treatment strategy (128/278), good medication prescribed by the protocol (117/278) and good half-time results (102/278) were most often mentioned. Over 95% of patients experienced participation ‘as expected’ or ‘better than expected’. In particular care by the study nurses was appreciated: 55 – 75% answered ‘better than expected’ to 4 questions regarding this issue. Additional examinations during the yearly visits (additional questionnaires, imaging techniques) were mentioned ‘worse than expected’ (10% of patients) as was filling in the 3-monthly questionnaires (7%). Most patients (74%) would participate in another trial and 94% would recommend participation to friends and family. 

Conclusion: Continued participation during 10 year follow-up in the BeSt study was relatively high (62%), although impaired functional ability, higher age, experiencing severe adverse events and achieving drug-free remission in the previous year were predictors for early termination. Motivators to continue participation were a wish to contribute to scientific research, to learn more about their disease and its treatment, personal benefit of available therapies, and a good rapport with the study nurse. By cultivating these motivators, early termination in future long-term follow-up studies might be reduced.


Disclosure:

I. M. Markusse,
None;

L. Dirven,
None;

T. H. E. Molenaar,
None;

N. Riyazi,
None;

P. B. J. de Sonnaville,
None;

P. J. S. M. Kerstens,
None;

W. F. Lems,
None;

T. W. J. Huizinga,
None;

C. F. Allaart,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/continued-participation-in-a-10-year-tight-control-treat-to-target-study-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-why-keep-patients-doing-their-best/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology