ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1342

Comprehensive Provider Judgment Outweighs Disease Activity Measures in the Decision to Not Escalate Therapy in Patients with Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis

Jacob R. Stever1, Brian Sauer2, Chia-Chen Teng, MS1, Neil Accortt3, David Collier4 and Grant Cannon1, 1Salt Lake City VA Medical Center and University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 2IDEAS Center and Division of Epidemiology, HSR&D SLC VA Medical Center and University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 3Center for Observational Research, Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 4Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Disease Activity, Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), treatment guidlelines and treatment options

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Clinical Aspects Poster II: Pathophysiology, Autoantibodies, and Disease Activity Measures

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Title: 

Comprehensive provider judgment outweighs disease activity measures in the decision to not escalate therapy in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. 

 

Authors:  

Stever, Sauer, Teng, Accortt, Collier, Cannon.

 

Background/Purpose:

We evaluated US Veterans with RA in the Veterans Affairs Rheumatoid Arthritis (VARA) registry with moderate/severe disease activity (DAS28>3.2) and noted that of 941 patients with DAS>3.2, 559 (59%) did not have a change in RA therapy.  We reviewed medical chart notes to determine provider reasoning for not modifying therapy despite documented moderate/severe RA disease activity.  

Methods:

US Veterans included in VARA had 1) moderate/severe disease activity (DAS28³3.2) on the index date, 2) 18 months of VA data prior to the index date and 3) no major change to their medical therapy within 7 days before to 90 days after the index date.  A major change was 1) initiation or escalation of DMARDs and/or prednisone and/or 2) 2 joint injections.  There were 220 patients from 9 VARA registry sites randomly selected for chart review and the reasons documented in the patient record for continuing on therapy were recorded.  In all patients, a Òcomprehensive provider judgmentÓ (CPJ) was made by the chart reviewer (JS) for each patient and categorized as mild or moderate/severe disease on the basis of text notes by the provider using these terms or similar comments on disease state. The CPJ was based on text notes and not physician global assessment by visual analog scale (VAS).

 

Results:

The reasons for continuing current therapy despite DAS28>3.2 are listed in Table 1.   A CPJ reported as mild was the predominant reason for no major change in therapy in 149 (68%) patients.  CPJ mild patients had lower tender joint counts, swollen joint count, and physician global assessment. This CPJ of mild disease activity was not associated with other parameters evaluated including patient global assessment, ESR, CRP, and Heath Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) (Table 2).

Conclusion:

The most common reason that RA patients remain on current therapy despite a documented DAS28>3.2 is a comprehensive provider judgment of acceptable disease activity.  Many cases involved patients with a low numbers of tender and swollen joints.  This observation suggests that a value of DAS28>3.2 may frequently occur in patients that most providers do not accept as having moderate/severe disease with sufficient confidence to direct therapy.  These data emphasize the need for a better understanding of factors in addition to disease activity measures directing therapy in clinical practice.

 



Disclosure: J. R. Stever, None; B. Sauer, Amgen, 2; C. C. Teng, MS, Amgen, 2; N. Accortt, Amgen, 1,Amgen, 3; D. Collier, Amgen, 1,Amgen, 3; G. Cannon, Amgen, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Stever JR, Sauer B, Teng MS CC, Accortt N, Collier D, Cannon G. Comprehensive Provider Judgment Outweighs Disease Activity Measures in the Decision to Not Escalate Therapy in Patients with Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comprehensive-provider-judgment-outweighs-disease-activity-measures-in-the-decision-to-not-escalate-therapy-in-patients-with-moderate-to-severe-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comprehensive-provider-judgment-outweighs-disease-activity-measures-in-the-decision-to-not-escalate-therapy-in-patients-with-moderate-to-severe-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology