ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2175

Comparisons of Patients Prescribed Biosimilars or BIO-Originators for Autoimmune Diseases in Germany

Sumesh Kachroo1, Christopher Black1, Emma Sullivan2, John Waller2 and James Piercy2, 1CORE, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, 2Adelphi Real World, Manchester, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: autoimmune diseases, biosimilars and prescribing trends

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health - Poster III

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: To compare the characteristics of patients who receive biosimilars against patients receiving bio-originators.

Methods: The Adelphi Biosimilars Programme 2016 is a cross-sectional survey of German rheumatologists who prescribe biosimilars. For a sample of their RA, AxSpA and PsA first line biosimilar or bio-originator patients, initiated since 2015 (the introduction of biosimilars in Germany), rheumatologists reported patient characteristics including: demographics, insurance coverage, clinical status and treatment history. Physicians were asked to describe a typical biosimilar patient in comparison to a bio-originator patient.

Results: No differences were observed in age, gender, ethnicity, BMI and employment status between biosimilar patients (n=100) and bio-originator patients (n=52). Patients initiated on bio-originators were more likely to have private health coverage (13%) than biosimilar patients (8%). 8% of biosimilar patients were ‘deteriorating rapidly’ at therapy initiation but this was 21% in bio-originator patients. Biosimilar patients were using non-advanced therapies (e.g. DMARD) for 11.6 months longer than bio-originator patients. Rheumatologist responses suggested there is no ‘typical’ biosimilar patient from a clinical/demographic perspective, though 28% stated it was cost difference that motivates them to prescribe to a specific patient.

Conclusion: The data shows that biosimilars are initiated in patients who are clinically less severe than bio-originator patients and that they also spend more time on alternative non-biologic therapies before biologic initiation. This suggests that when a more severe patient is being treated physician are more likely to choose are more well-known bio-originator. Physicians did not describe a ‘typical’ patient in terms of clinical characteristics and stated that it was cost reasons that would drive them to prescribe biosimilars in most patients, suggesting that payer pressure is influencing prescribing decisions.


Disclosure: S. Kachroo, Merck and Co Inc, 3; C. Black, Merck and Co Inc, 3; E. Sullivan, Adelphi Real World, 3; J. Waller, Adelphi Real World, 3; J. Piercy, Adelphi Real World, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kachroo S, Black C, Sullivan E, Waller J, Piercy J. Comparisons of Patients Prescribed Biosimilars or BIO-Originators for Autoimmune Diseases in Germany [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparisons-of-patients-prescribed-biosimilars-or-bio-originators-for-autoimmune-diseases-in-germany/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparisons-of-patients-prescribed-biosimilars-or-bio-originators-for-autoimmune-diseases-in-germany/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology